• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学不端行为:全球关注的问题。

Scientific Misconduct: A Global Concern.

作者信息

Khadilkar Suvarna Satish

机构信息

Consultant Gyne-Endocrinologist, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, 12 New Marine Line, Mumbai, 400020 India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Oct;68(5):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1175-8. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-018-1175-8
PMID:30224834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6133788/
Abstract

In today's world, evil appears to be all pervading. Medical publication is no exception. Scientific misconduct in medical writing is slowly becoming a global concern, especially over the last few decades. While the occurrence of such events is certainly rare, every researcher and reader should be aware of this entity. The researcher should ensure that no inadvertent error is construed as misconduct, and should take every effort to guard against it, and the reader should have a critical eye for the same. This article looks into various aspects of scientific misconduct and encourages awareness regarding the same.

摘要

在当今世界,邪恶似乎无处不在。医学出版也不例外。医学写作中的科学不端行为正逐渐成为一个全球关注的问题,尤其是在过去几十年里。虽然这类事件的发生确实罕见,但每位研究人员和读者都应该了解这一现象。研究人员应确保不会将无意的错误视为不端行为,并应竭尽全力防范,而读者也应对此保持批判性眼光。本文探讨了科学不端行为的各个方面,并鼓励人们对此提高认识。

相似文献

1
Scientific Misconduct: A Global Concern.科学不端行为:全球关注的问题。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Oct;68(5):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1175-8. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
2
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
3
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.评估伊朗的科研不端行为:伊朗医学教师的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00642-2.
4
Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education.与健康职业教育中科研不端行为和有问题的研究实践相关的因素。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):74-82. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x.
5
Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.尼日利亚一组研究人员中科学不端行为的流行率。
Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
Misconduct versus honest error and scientific disagreement.不当行为与诚实错误和科学分歧。
Account Res. 2012;19(1):56-63. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.650948.
7
Knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among medical students.医学生对发表中的科研不端行为的认知。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 May-Aug;30(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_221_16.
8
Rising from Plagiarising.从抄袭中崛起。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Sep;14(3):538-40. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0705-x. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
9
Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science?科学不端行为:护理科学中也存在的问题?
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Jul;46(4):271-80. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12082. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
10
Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.科学不端行为影响下的生物医学文章被引分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Jun;16(2):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9151-4. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Why is it important to implement meta-research in universities and institutes with medical research activities?为什么在开展医学研究活动的大学和机构中实施元研究很重要?
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Mar 19;10:1497280. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1497280. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices About Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct Among the Faculty and Medical Postgraduates Working in Medical Colleges in North Karnataka and Central India: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.印度北部卡纳塔克邦和中部医学院教职工及医学研究生对研究诚信和科学不端行为的认知、态度及行为:一项横断面在线调查
Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59200. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Deceiving scientific research, misconduct events are possibly a more common practice than foreseen.欺骗性的科学研究,不当行为事件可能比预想的更为普遍。
Environ Sci Eur. 2022;34(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12302-022-00659-3. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
The Plague of Plagiarism: Prevention and Cure!!!剽窃之祸:预防与解决之道!!!
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Dec;68(6):425-431. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1182-9. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Research misconduct: A neglected plague.科研不端行为:一种被忽视的祸患。
Indian J Public Health. 2017 Jan-Mar;61(1):33-36. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.200255.
2
Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practice.药物试验结果的发表与未发表情况:挪威普通医疗实践中为期10年的试验队列研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010535.
3
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.涉及人类的研究中的利益冲突。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.
4
Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.研究不端行为:恶意中伤。
J R Soc Med. 2006 May;99(5):232-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900514.