• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验诱导的社会威胁会增加偏执思维。

Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking.

作者信息

Saalfeld Vanessa, Ramadan Zeina, Bell Vaughan, Raihani Nichola J

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):180569. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180569. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.180569
PMID:30225050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6124070/
Abstract

The ability to attribute intentions to others is a hallmark of human social cognition but is altered in paranoia. Paranoia is the most common positive symptom of psychosis but is also present to varying degrees in the general population. Epidemiological models suggest that psychosis risk is associated with low social rank and minority status, but the causal effects of status and group affiliation on paranoid thinking remain unclear. We examined whether relative social status and perceived group affiliation, respectively, affect live paranoid thinking using two large- ( = 2030), pre-registered experiments. Interacting with someone from a higher social rank or a political out-group led to an increase in paranoid attributions of harmful intent for ambiguous actions. Pre-existing paranoia predicted a general increase in harmful intent attribution, but there was no interaction with either type of social threat: highly paranoid people showed the same magnitude of increase as non-paranoid people, although from a higher baseline. We conclude social threat in the form of low social status and out-group status affects paranoid attributions, but ongoing paranoia represents a lowered threshold for detecting social threat rather than an impaired reactivity to it.

摘要

将意图归因于他人的能力是人类社会认知的一个标志,但在偏执状态下会发生改变。偏执是精神病最常见的阳性症状,但在普通人群中也有不同程度的存在。流行病学模型表明,精神病风险与社会地位低下和少数群体身份有关,但地位和群体归属对偏执思维的因果影响仍不明确。我们使用两项大型(N = 2030)、预先注册的实验,分别考察了相对社会地位和感知到的群体归属是否会影响实时偏执思维。与社会地位较高的人或政治外群体的人互动,会导致对模糊行为的有害意图的偏执归因增加。先前存在的偏执预测有害意图归因会普遍增加,但与任何一种社会威胁都没有相互作用:高度偏执的人与非偏执的人表现出相同程度的增加,尽管起点更高。我们得出结论,低社会地位和外群体地位形式的社会威胁会影响偏执归因,但持续的偏执代表着检测社会威胁的阈值降低,而不是对其反应受损。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/94b671817b6b/rsos180569-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/05b42a63f6ac/rsos180569-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/6a8b892d88ed/rsos180569-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/8a90e3971770/rsos180569-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/23accbc842da/rsos180569-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/94b671817b6b/rsos180569-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/05b42a63f6ac/rsos180569-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/6a8b892d88ed/rsos180569-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/8a90e3971770/rsos180569-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/23accbc842da/rsos180569-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a7/6124070/94b671817b6b/rsos180569-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking.实验诱导的社会威胁会增加偏执思维。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):180569. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180569. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Paranoia and conspiracy: group cohesion increases harmful intent attribution in the Trust Game.偏执与阴谋:群体凝聚力增加了信任博弈中有害意图的归因。
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 16;7:e7403. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7403. eCollection 2019.
3
Reduction in social learning and increased policy uncertainty about harmful intent is associated with pre-existing paranoid beliefs: Evidence from modelling a modified serial dictator game.社会学习的减少和对恶意意图的政策不确定性的增加与预先存在的偏执信念有关:从修改后的系列独裁者游戏建模中得出的证据。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):e1008372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008372. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Paranoia, sensitization and social inference: findings from two large-scale, multi-round behavioural experiments.偏执、敏感化与社会推理:两项大规模多轮行为实验的结果
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 11;7(3):191525. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191525. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Conflict and cooperation in paranoia: a large-scale behavioural experiment.偏执狂中的冲突与合作:一项大规模行为实验。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jul;48(9):1523-1531. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003075. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Paranoia and the social representation of others: a large-scale game theory approach.偏执狂与他人的社会表征:大规模博弈论方法。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 3;7(1):4544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04805-3.
7
Recall of threat material is modulated by self or other referencing in people with high or low levels of non-clinical paranoia.在非临床偏执水平高或低的人群中,对威胁性材料的回忆会受到自我或他人参照的调节。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;50:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Paranoid Thinking as a Function of Minority Group Status and Intersectionality: An International Examination of the Role of Negative Beliefs.偏执思维作为少数群体地位和交叉性的函数:对负面信念作用的国际考察。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jul 4;49(4):1078-1087. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad027.
9
The roles of coalitional threat and safety in paranoia: A network approach.联盟威胁和安全感在妄想中的作用:一种网络方法。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jun;61(2):541-555. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12342. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
Cognitive control processes in paranoia: the impact of threat induction on strategic cognition and self-focused attention.偏执狂中的认知控制过程:威胁诱导对策略性认知和自我关注的影响。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2015 Jan;43(1):108-18. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000891. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Diverse Experiences and Coping During the COVID-19 Lockdown and Unlock in India.印度新冠疫情封锁与解封期间的多样经历及应对方式
Trends Psychol. 2022 Jun 7:1-40. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00196-1.
2
Asymmetric cognitive learning mechanisms underlying the persistence of intergroup bias.群体间偏见持续存在背后的不对称认知学习机制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;2(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00061-0.
3
Social identification and paranoia.社会认同与偏执狂。

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Global Gene Expression Profiles.全球基因表达谱分析
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1792:157-166. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7865-6_11.
2
A genetic locus for paranoia.偏执狂的遗传基因座。
Biol Lett. 2018 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0694.
3
Conflict and cooperation in paranoia: a large-scale behavioural experiment.偏执狂中的冲突与合作:一项大规模行为实验。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 19;11(6):231961. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231961. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Psychotomimetic compensation versus sensitization.精神拟态补偿与敏化。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Aug;12(4):e1217. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1217.
5
Conspiracy mentality, subclinical paranoia, and political conservatism are associated with perceived status threat.阴谋心态、亚临床偏执和政治保守主义与感知到的地位威胁有关。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0293930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293930. eCollection 2023.
6
The effects of paranoia and dopamine on perception of cohesion and conspiracy: a pre-registered, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment.偏执和多巴胺对凝聚力和阴谋感知的影响:一项预先注册的、双盲、安慰剂对照实验。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Jan;241(1):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06476-7. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
7
Punishment: one tool, many uses.惩罚:一种工具,多种用途。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Nov 12;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.12. eCollection 2019.
8
Paranoid thinking and perceived competitive intention.偏执思维与感知到的竞争意图。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 10;11:e15003. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15003. eCollection 2023.
9
Schizophrenia and Increased Distrust-Based Competitiveness in Interpersonal Interactions: A Serial Process Model.精神分裂症与人际互动中基于不信任的竞争加剧:一个串联过程模型。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jul 4;49(4):1088-1094. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad021.
10
Racism and psychosis: an umbrella review and qualitative analysis of the mental health consequences of racism.种族主义与精神分裂症:种族主义对心理健康影响的 umbrella 综述和定性分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug;273(5):1009-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01468-8. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Psychol Med. 2018 Jul;48(9):1523-1531. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003075. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Negative social comparisons and psychosis proneness in a healthy adolescent population.健康青少年群体中的消极社会比较与精神病倾向。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;46:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis.主观社会地位是身体健康的独特相关因素吗?一项荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2017 Dec;36(12):1109-1125. doi: 10.1037/hea0000534. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Paranoia and the social representation of others: a large-scale game theory approach.偏执狂与他人的社会表征:大规模博弈论方法。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 3;7(1):4544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04805-3.
7
Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.偏执狂的认知偏差矫正(CBM-pa):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 29;18(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x.
8
Rethinking Social Cognition in Light of Psychosis: Reciprocal Implications for Cognition and Psychopathology.从精神病角度重新思考社会认知:对认知与精神病理学的相互影响
Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 May;5(3):537-550. doi: 10.1177/2167702616677079. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Do paranoid delusions exist on a continuum with subclinical paranoia? A multi-method taxometric study.偏执妄想是否存在于亚临床偏执的连续体中?一项多方法分类研究。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
10
Hierarchy stability moderates the effect of status on stress and performance in humans.等级制度的稳定性调节了地位对人类压力和表现的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 3;114(1):78-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609811114. Epub 2016 Dec 19.