Vivas Leticia, Manoiloff Laura, García Adolfo M, Lizarralde Francisco, Vivas Jorge
Psychology Faculty, Institute of Basic and Applied Psychology and Technology, National University of Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, Building V, Level III, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9601-8.
The processes tapped by the widely-used word association (WA) paradigm remain a matter of debate: while some authors consider them as driven by lexical co-occurrences, others emphasize the role of meaning-based connections. To test these contrastive hypotheses, we analyzed responses in a WA task in terms of their normative defining features (those describing the object denoted by the cue word). Results indicate that 72.5% of the responses had medium-to-high coincidence with such defining semantic features. Moreover, 75.51% of responses had medium-to-high values of Relevance (a measure of the importance of the feature for construing a given concept). Furthermore, most responses (62.7%) referred to elements of the situation in which the concept usually appears, followed by sensory properties (e.g., color) of the denoted object (27.86%). These results suggest that the processes behind WA tasks involve a reactivation of the cue item's semantic properties, particularly those most relevant to its core meaning.
广泛使用的词语联想(WA)范式所涉及的过程仍然存在争议:一些作者认为这些过程是由词汇共现驱动的,而另一些作者则强调基于意义的联系的作用。为了检验这些对比性假设,我们根据其规范性定义特征(即描述线索词所表示的对象的特征)分析了词语联想任务中的反应。结果表明,72.5%的反应与这些定义性语义特征具有中到高度的一致性。此外,75.51%的反应具有中到高度的相关性值(一种衡量特征对于解释给定概念的重要性的指标)。此外,大多数反应(62.7%)提到了该概念通常出现的情境中的元素,其次是所表示对象的感官属性(如颜色)(27.86%)。这些结果表明,词语联想任务背后的过程涉及线索项目语义属性的重新激活,特别是那些与其核心意义最相关的属性。