Area of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Center for Sport Studies, King Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, Performance and Health Group, A Coruña, Spain.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 16;375:112144. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112144. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
The interest in the use of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the enhancement of cognitive functioning has increased significantly in recent years. However, the efficacy of this technique remains to be established.
The current study explored the effects of anodal vs. sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during the performance of the digit span backwards task.
30 healthy participants received 'offline' anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 15 min) to the left DLPFC in an intra-individual, cross-over, sham-controlled experimental design. Memory span performance was assessed before (baseline), immediately after tDCS administration (T1) and 10 min post-T1 (T2). We applied cluster analysis in order to characterize individual responses to tDCS, and in order to identify naturally occurring subgroups that may be present.
Analysis of all the subjects showed that anodal tDCS failed to improve memory span performance. Cluster analysis revealed the presence of a subgroup of 'responders' that significantly improved their performance after anodal (vs. sham) tDCS in T1 (47%) and T2 (46%). However, there was no significant improvement in performance after anodal tDCS compared to the best baseline performance.
Our findings suggest that tDCS does not improve memory span performance and highlights the need for better ways to optimize methodological approaches in order to account for inter-individual variability and accurately assess the evidential value of tDCS-linked cognitive outcomes.
近年来,人们对使用阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来增强认知功能的兴趣显著增加。然而,这种技术的疗效仍有待确定。
本研究探讨了在进行数字倒背任务时,左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)接受阳极 tDCS 与假刺激的效果。
30 名健康参与者在个体内、交叉、假刺激对照的实验设计中接受了左 DLPFC 的“离线”阳极 tDCS(1.5 mA,15 分钟)。记忆跨度表现分别在(基线)、tDCS 给药后即刻(T1)和 T1 后 10 分钟(T2)进行评估。我们应用聚类分析来描述个体对 tDCS 的反应,并识别可能存在的自然发生的亚组。
对所有受试者的分析表明,阳极 tDCS 未能改善记忆跨度表现。聚类分析显示存在一个“反应者”亚组,他们在 T1(47%)和 T2(46%)时,在接受阳极(与假刺激)tDCS 后,记忆表现显著提高。然而,与最佳基线表现相比,阳极 tDCS 后并没有显著提高表现。
我们的发现表明 tDCS 不能改善记忆跨度表现,并强调需要更好的方法来优化方法学方法,以解释个体间的变异性,并准确评估与 tDCS 相关的认知结果的证据价值。