• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Quality criteria for academic assessments according to Kane's framework].

作者信息

Fischer Volkhard

机构信息

Studiendekanat, Bereich Evaluation & Kapazität, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, OE 9135, 30623, Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Apr;169(5-6):110-118. doi: 10.1007/s10354-018-0661-z. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10354-018-0661-z
PMID:30229335
Abstract

Although the publication of the recommendations of GMA and MFT in 2014 concerning the improvement of assessment quality in medical education had been an important step for the German-speaking faculties, it is still necessary to increase the efforts. There are still some aspects of assessments which were only intimated by the recommendations.Kane's framework for the validation of tests, published in 2013, is of special importance for assessments within medical studies. But the application of this framework hasn't been consequent enough until now. The article tries to give an indirect, general answer to the question, what has to be considered, when assessments in medical education were planned.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Quality criteria for academic assessments according to Kane's framework].
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Apr;169(5-6):110-118. doi: 10.1007/s10354-018-0661-z. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.效度论证的当代方法:凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
3
Providing a model for validation of the assessment system of internal medicine residents based on Kane's framework.基于凯恩框架为内科住院医师评估系统的验证提供一个模型。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Oct 29;10:386. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1500_20. eCollection 2021.
4
Applying Kane's validity framework to a simulation based assessment of clinical competence.运用凯恩有效性理论框架对基于模拟的临床能力评估进行分析。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):323-338. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9800-3. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.计划性评估与凯恩的效度观。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x.
6
Recommendations of the German Society for Medical Education and the German Association of Medical Faculties regarding university-specific assessments during the study of human, dental and veterinary medicine.德国医学教育协会和德国医学院协会关于人类医学、牙医学和兽医学学习期间大学特定评估的建议。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014 Aug 15;31(3):Doc34. doi: 10.3205/zma000926. eCollection 2014.
7
An Application of Kane's Validity Framework to Evaluate Formative and Summative Assessment Instruments for Telesimulations in Clinical Lactation.凯恩有效性框架在临床哺乳模拟的形成性和总结性评估工具中的应用。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Oct 1;17(5):313-321. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000653. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Redeveloping a workplace-based assessment program for physicians using Kane's validity framework.运用凯恩效度框架为医生重新开发基于工作场所的评估项目。
Can Med Educ J. 2018 Jul 27;9(3):e14-e24. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Validation of learning assessments: A primer.学习评估的验证:入门指南。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
Validity considerations in the assessment of professionalism.评估专业精神时的有效性考虑因素。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):165-81. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9219-6. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
On including assessments in the calculation of teaching loads.关于将评估纳入教学工作量计算。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):Doc3. doi: 10.3205/zma001658. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
An algorithm for calculating exam quality as a basis for performance-based allocation of funds at medical schools.一种计算考试质量的算法,作为医学院基于绩效分配资金的基础。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 May 17;33(3):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001043. eCollection 2016.
2
Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment.克服60%的及格分数并提高评估质量。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Oct 15;32(4):Doc43. doi: 10.3205/zma000985. eCollection 2015.
3
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.
效度论证的当代方法:凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
4
Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.计划性评估与凯恩的效度观。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x.
5
Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45.档案袋评估与学习:AMEE 指南第 45 号。
Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):790-801. doi: 10.1080/01421590903139201.
6
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持:医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.
7
Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.基于工作场所的评估作为一种教育工具:AMEE 指南第 31 号。
Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):855-71. doi: 10.1080/01421590701775453.
8
AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician.医学教育与评估协会指南第25号:胜任且具反思能力的医生学习成果评估
Med Teach. 2003 Nov;25(6):569-84. doi: 10.1080/0142159032000151907.
9
Construct validity in psychological tests.心理测试中的结构效度。
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.