• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于将评估纳入教学工作量计算。

On including assessments in the calculation of teaching loads.

机构信息

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Studiendekanat Bereich Evaluation & Kapazität, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):Doc3. doi: 10.3205/zma001658. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3205/zma001658
PMID:38504863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10946209/
Abstract

Next to courses and seminars, tests and assessments represent the main parameters with which to describe an academic study program independent of its curricular content. Thus, the quality of education depends not only on the quality of the courses taught and how they are interconnected, but also on the quality of testing and the feedback given to students regarding their performance. Course quality should be ensured through course evaluation. The economic cost of courses is calculated based on the required teaching load. The concept of teaching load stems from the time when program planning was instructor-centered. The main variable in the rules and regulations governing university study was the number of hours per week per semester (or number of course hours). But even in today's student-centered planning, which uses ECTS credits per module as the variable, teaching loads are still used to determine the number of staff necessary to offer an academic study program. Some universities also include the assessments in the evaluation. Yet the economic costs of testing are de facto ignored almost everywhere, and this does not bode well for the quality of the assessments. Much progress would be made to improve higher education if assessments counted as part of the teaching loads and the curricular norm values. This paper identifies which requirements must be considered in order to include assessments in teaching loads.

摘要

除了课程和研讨会之外,测试和评估是描述一个独立于课程内容的学术研究项目的主要参数。因此,教育质量不仅取决于所教授课程的质量及其相互关联的程度,还取决于测试的质量以及向学生提供的关于其表现的反馈。课程质量应通过课程评估来保证。课程的经济成本是根据所需的教学工作量计算的。教学工作量的概念源于以教师为中心的课程规划时代。在大学学习的规章制度中,主要变量是每学期每周的课时数(或课程时数)。但即使在今天以模块为单位的 ECTS 学分的学生为中心的规划中,仍使用教学工作量来确定提供学术研究项目所需的员工人数。一些大学还将评估纳入评估中。然而,测试的经济成本几乎在任何地方都被忽视了,这对评估的质量没有好处。如果评估被视为教学工作量和课程规范值的一部分,那么提高高等教育质量将取得很大进展。本文确定了将评估纳入教学工作量中需要考虑的哪些要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/cbc19e8ca0d7/JME-41-3-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/73f9aaf5d2b3/JME-41-3-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/c6f5e86e3ee7/JME-41-3-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/a9df29a3e553/JME-41-3-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/cbc19e8ca0d7/JME-41-3-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/73f9aaf5d2b3/JME-41-3-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/c6f5e86e3ee7/JME-41-3-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/a9df29a3e553/JME-41-3-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01df/10946209/cbc19e8ca0d7/JME-41-3-g-001.jpg

相似文献

1
On including assessments in the calculation of teaching loads.关于将评估纳入教学工作量计算。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):Doc3. doi: 10.3205/zma001658. eCollection 2024.
2
Curricular course for medical students at a hematology and oncology specialty practice, 2010-2022.2010-2022 年血液病学和肿瘤学专业实践中的医学生课程。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001561. eCollection 2022.
3
Using Pathway Modeling to Evaluate and Improve Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Co-Taught College Science Courses.运用路径建模评估和改进合作式大学理科课程中的以学生为中心的教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-07-0147.
4
[The elective planetary health: Climate, environment and health at the faculty of medicine in Würzburg: Concept, didactic methods and evaluation results].[选修行星健康:维尔茨堡医学院的气候、环境与健康:概念、教学方法及评估结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 May;186:92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.001. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
[Study of the introduction of the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) in pediatrics and modification of the teaching methodology].[欧洲学分转换系统(ECTS)在儿科学中的引入及教学方法的改进研究]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2006 Nov;65(5):415-27. doi: 10.1157/13094247.
6
A unique and effective method of anatomy education: Small-group learning with prosected plastinated specimens.一种独特而有效的解剖学教育方法:小组学习与预制塑化标本。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Apr;86(4):425-436. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12817. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Climbing the Integration Ladder: A Case Study on an Interdisciplinary and Case-Based Approach to Teaching General Pathology, Parasitology and Microbiology in the Veterinary Curriculum.攀登整合阶梯:兽医学课程中综合病例式教学普通病理学、寄生虫学和微生物学的案例研究
J Vet Med Educ. 2022 Apr;49(2):210-222. doi: 10.3138/jvme-2020-0085. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
The Brandenburg reformed medical curriculum: study locally, work locally.勃兰登堡改革后的医学课程:就地学习,就地工作。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;36(5):Doc49. doi: 10.3205/zma001257. eCollection 2019.
9
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
10
Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education.传统与强化在线研究生健康专业教育项目学生成果比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7.

本文引用的文献

1
[Quality criteria for academic assessments according to Kane's framework].
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Apr;169(5-6):110-118. doi: 10.1007/s10354-018-0661-z. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.效度论证的当代方法:凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
3
Recommendations of the German Society for Medical Education and the German Association of Medical Faculties regarding university-specific assessments during the study of human, dental and veterinary medicine.德国医学教育协会和德国医学院协会关于人类医学、牙医学和兽医学学习期间大学特定评估的建议。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014 Aug 15;31(3):Doc34. doi: 10.3205/zma000926. eCollection 2014.
4
Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.计划性评估与凯恩的效度观。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x.
5
General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57.评估中使用的理论概述:AMEE 指南第 57 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(10):783-97. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611022.
6
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.多项选择题考试中的标准设定与维持:医学教育与培训学会指南第37号
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247.
7
Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations.制定客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和标准化患者检查的合理性能标准。
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):245-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100274.