• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用地理加权回归进行社会不平等分析:美国县中精神不健康天数 (MUDs) 与社会经济地位 (SES) 的关联。

Using geographically weighted regression for social inequality analysis: association between mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) and socioeconomic status (SES) in U.S. counties.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, AL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1521915. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1080/09603123.2018.1521915
PMID:30230366
Abstract

This research explores geographic variability of factors on social inequality related to mental health in the United States using county-level data in 2014. First, we account for complex design factors in Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data such as clustering, stratification, and sample weight using Complex Samples General Linear Model (CSGLM). Then, three variables are used in the model as indicators of social inequality, low socioeconomic status (SES): unemployment, education status, and social association status. A geographically weighted regression analysis is applied to examine the spatial variations in the associations of mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) with the indicators of SES in the United States. The results demonstrate that unemployment and education level show global positive and negative influences respectively on MUDs. Social association status ranged from positive to negative across the United States, implying some geographic clustering. These findings suggest that social and health policies should be adjusted to address the different effects of indicators of social inequality on mental health across different social characteristics of communities to more effectively manage mental health problems.

摘要

本研究使用 2014 年的县级数据,探讨了美国心理健康相关社会不平等因素的地域差异。首先,我们使用行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据中的复杂设计因素,如聚类、分层和样本权重,采用复杂样本广义线性模型(CSGLM)进行分析。然后,该模型使用三个变量作为社会不平等的指标,即低社会经济地位(SES):失业、教育状况和社会联系状况。应用地理加权回归分析来检验美国心理健康不良天数(MUDs)与 SES 指标之间关联的空间变化。结果表明,失业和教育水平对 MUDs 分别有全球性的正向和负向影响。社会联系状况在美国各地的范围从正到负不等,这意味着存在一些地理集聚。这些发现表明,社会和卫生政策应该进行调整,以解决不同社区社会特征下社会不平等指标对心理健康的不同影响,从而更有效地管理心理健康问题。

相似文献

1
Using geographically weighted regression for social inequality analysis: association between mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) and socioeconomic status (SES) in U.S. counties.使用地理加权回归进行社会不平等分析:美国县中精神不健康天数 (MUDs) 与社会经济地位 (SES) 的关联。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1521915. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
2
A spatial epidemiology case study of mentally unhealthy days (MUDs): air pollution, community resilience, and sunlight perspectives.一项关于精神不健康天数(MUDs)的空间流行病学案例研究:空气污染、社区复原力和阳光视角。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2021 Jul;31(5):491-506. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1669768. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Geographically varying associations between mentally unhealthy days and social vulnerability in the USA.美国心理健康状况不佳天数与社会脆弱性的地域差异关联。
Public Health. 2023 Sep;222:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Geographic Variation in Mentally Unhealthy Days: Air Pollution and Altitude Perspectives.心理健康不佳天数的地理差异:空气污染与海拔视角
High Alt Med Biol. 2017 Sep;18(3):258-266. doi: 10.1089/ham.2016.0137. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
Mental Health and Recreation Opportunities.心理健康与娱乐机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;17(24):9338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249338.
6
Predicting geographical variations in behavioural risk factors: an analysis of physical and mental healthy days.预测行为风险因素的地理差异:身心健康天数分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Feb;58(2):150-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.58.2.150.
7
County-level social environment determinants of health-related quality of life among US adults: a multilevel analysis.县级社会环境对美国成年人健康相关生活质量的影响因素:一项多层次分析。
J Community Health. 2009 Oct;34(5):430-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9173-5.
8
Income inequality and suicide in the United States: A spatial analysis of 1684 U.S. counties using geographically weighted regression.美国的收入不平等与自杀:基于地理加权回归的 1684 个美国县的空间分析。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;34:100359. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100359. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
9
Mental health in the foreclosure crisis.住房赎回权丧失危机中的心理健康问题。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
10
Geographical Variations in the Environmental Determinants of Physical Inactivity among U.S. Adults.美国成年人身体活动不足的环境决定因素的地理差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 31;14(11):1326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111326.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics.将交叉性纳入生物医学信息学的机会。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jun;154:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104653. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Using community-based geographical information system (GIS) to recruit older Asian Americans in an Alzheimer's disease study.利用社区地理信息系统(GIS)招募老年亚裔美国人参与阿尔茨海默病研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):e072761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072761.
3
Ecological Study of Urbanicity and Self-reported Poor Mental Health Days Across US Counties.
美国各县城市化与自述心理健康不佳天数的生态学研究
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jul;59(5):986-998. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01082-x. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Is Living in a U.S. Coastal City Good for One's Health?生活在美国沿海城市对健康有益吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 9;18(16):8399. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168399.
5
Mental Health and Recreation Opportunities.心理健康与娱乐机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;17(24):9338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249338.