Behavioral Medicine Research Center and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; email:
Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930, USA; email:
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:423-448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
Trait stability and maturation are fundamental principles of contemporary personality psychology and have been shown to hold across many cultures. However, it has proven difficult to move beyond these general findings to a detailed account of trait development. There are pervasive and unexplained inconsistencies across studies that may be due to ( a) insufficient attention to measurement error, ( b) subtle but age-sensitive differences in alternative measures of the same trait, or ( c) different perspectives reflected in self-reports and observer ratings. Multiscale, multimethod-and ideally multinational-studies are needed. Several hypotheses have been proposed to account for trait stability and change, but supporting evidence is currently weak or indirect; trait development is a fertile if sometimes frustrating field for theory and research. Beyond traits, there are approaches to personality development that are of interest to students of adult development, and these may be fruitfully addressed from a trait perspective.
特质稳定性和成熟性是当代人格心理学的基本原则,已被证明在许多文化中都具有普遍性。然而,要超越这些普遍发现,详细说明特质发展,仍然具有挑战性。研究中存在普遍而未解释的不一致性,这可能归因于(a)对测量误差的关注不足,(b)同一特质的替代测量方法中微妙但对年龄敏感的差异,或(c)自我报告和观察者评分中反映的不同观点。需要进行多尺度、多方法——理想情况下是跨国——研究。已经提出了几个假设来解释特质的稳定性和变化,但支持证据目前还很薄弱或间接;特质发展是理论和研究的一个富有成效但有时令人沮丧的领域。除了特质,还有一些人格发展的方法,这些方法对成年发展的学生很有吸引力,从特质的角度来看,这些方法可能会得到很好的解决。