CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Institute of Health Research of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203576. eCollection 2018.
To analyse the acute muscular fatigue (AMF) in triceps brachii and rectus abdominis during compression-only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by certified basic life support providers.
Twenty-six subjects were initially recruited and randomly allocated to two study groups according to the muscles analysed; eighteen finally met the inclusion criteria (nine in each group). Both groups carried out two CPR tests (compression-only and standard CPR) of 10 min divided into five 2-min intermittent periods. The ventilation method was freely chosen by each participant (mouth-to-mouth, pocket-mask or bag-valve-mask). CPR feedback was provided all the time. AMF was measured by tensiomyography at baseline and after each 2-min period of the CPR test, in triceps brachii or rectus abdominis according to the study group.
Rectus abdominis' contraction time increased significantly during the fifth CPR period (p = 0.020). Triceps brachii's radial muscle belly displacement (p = 0.047) and contraction velocity (p = 0.018) were lower during compression-only CPR than during standard CPR. Participants who had trained previously with feedback devices achieved better CPR quality results in both protocols. Half of participants chose bag-valve-mask to perform ventilations but attained lower significant ventilation quality than the other subjects.
Compression-only CPR induces higher AMF than standard CPR. Significantly higher fatigue levels were found during the fifth CPR test period, regardless of the method. Adequate rescuer's strength seems to be a requisite to take advantage of CPR quality feedback devices. Training should put more emphasis on the quality of ventilation during CPR.
分析由经过认证的基础生命支持提供者进行的单纯按压式心肺复苏术(CPR)和标准 CPR 时肱三头肌和腹直肌的急性肌肉疲劳(AMF)。
最初招募了 26 名受试者,并根据分析的肌肉将其随机分配到两个研究组;最终有 18 名符合纳入标准(每组 9 名)。两组均进行了两次 10 分钟的 CPR 测试(单纯按压式和标准 CPR),分为五个 2 分钟的间歇期。每个参与者都可以自由选择通气方式(口对口、口袋面罩或球囊面罩)。始终提供 CPR 反馈。根据研究组,在基线和 CPR 测试的每个 2 分钟周期后,通过肌电描记术测量肱三头肌或腹直肌的 AMF。
第五个 CPR 周期时,腹直肌的收缩时间明显增加(p = 0.020)。与标准 CPR 相比,单纯按压式 CPR 时肱三头肌的桡侧肌腹位移(p = 0.047)和收缩速度(p = 0.018)较低。使用反馈设备进行过先前培训的参与者在两种方案中均能获得更好的 CPR 质量结果。有一半的参与者选择球囊面罩进行通气,但与其他参与者相比,通气质量显著降低。
单纯按压式 CPR 比标准 CPR 引起更高的 AMF。无论使用哪种方法,在第五个 CPR 测试周期中都会发现明显更高的疲劳水平。救援人员的力量似乎是充分利用 CPR 质量反馈设备的必要条件。培训应更加注重 CPR 期间的通气质量。