Muijser H, Hooisma J, Hoogendijk E M, Twisk D A
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;58(4):287-99. doi: 10.1007/BF00377886.
Two methods of evaluating the threshold for vibration perception were compared. Surprisingly it appears that the theoretically attractive, adaptive forced choice method does not result in lower variability than the method of limits. Moreover two devices were used to evaluate the threshold: the Optacon Tactile Tester and the "multirod". Based on the characteristics of these devices and the known properties of mechanoreceptors, it is argued that the two devices test different mechanoreceptor systems. The high correlation of threshold with age (r = 0.9) found by Arezzo and Schaumburg in measurements with the Optacon could not be reproduced.
比较了两种评估振动感知阈值的方法。令人惊讶的是,理论上有吸引力的自适应强制选择法似乎并不比极限法产生更低的变异性。此外,使用了两种设备来评估阈值:Optacon触觉测试仪和“多棒”。基于这些设备的特性和机械感受器的已知属性,有人认为这两种设备测试的是不同的机械感受器系统。阿雷佐和绍恩伯格在用Optacon进行测量时发现阈值与年龄的高度相关性(r = 0.9)无法重现。