Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Geneva University Medical School, Genève, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203960. eCollection 2018.
Medical end-of-life decisions (MELD) and shared decision-making are increasingly important issues for a majority of persons at the end of life. Little is known, however, about the impact of physician characteristics on these practices. We aimed at investigating whether MELDs depend on physician characteristics when controlling for patient characteristics and place of death.
Using a random sample (N = 8,963) of all deaths aged 1 year or older registered in Switzerland between 7 August 2013 and 5 February 2014, questionnaires covering MELD details and physicians' demographics, life stance and medical formation were sent to certifying physicians. The response rate was 59.4% (N = 5,328). Determinants of MELDs were analyzed in binary and multinomial logistic regression models. MELDs discussed with the patient or relatives were a secondary outcome. A total of 3,391 non-sudden nor completely unexpected deaths were used, 83% of which were preceded by forgoing treatment(s) and/or intensified alleviation of pain/symptoms intending or taking into account shortening of life. International medical graduates reported forgoing treatment less often, either alone (RRR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.21-0.41) or combined with the intensified alleviation of pain and symptoms (RRR = 0.44; 0.34-0.55). The latter was also more prevalent among physicians who graduated in 2000 or later (RRR = 1.60; 1.17-2.19). MELDs were generally less frequent among physicians with a religious affiliation. Shared-decision making was analyzed among 2,542 decedents. MELDs were discussed with patient or relatives less frequently when physicians graduated abroad (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87) and more frequently when physicians graduated more recently; physician's sex and religion had no impact.
Physicians' characteristics, including the country of medical education and time since graduation had a significant effect on the likelihood of an MELD and of shared decision-making. These findings call for additional efforts in physicians' education and training concerning end-of-life practices and improved communication skills.
对于大多数生命末期的人来说,医疗末期决策(MELD)和共同决策越来越重要。然而,对于医生的特征对这些实践的影响知之甚少。我们旨在调查在控制患者特征和死亡地点的情况下,MELD 是否取决于医生的特征。
使用 2013 年 8 月 7 日至 2014 年 2 月 5 日期间在瑞士登记的所有 1 岁及以上死亡的随机样本(N=8963),向认证医生发送了涵盖 MELD 详细信息以及医生人口统计学、生活立场和医疗培训的调查问卷。回复率为 59.4%(N=5328)。使用二元和多项逻辑回归模型分析 MELD 的决定因素。与患者或亲属讨论的 MELD 是次要结果。共使用了 3391 例非突然或完全意外死亡,其中 83%的死亡是在放弃治疗和/或加强缓解疼痛/症状的情况下发生的,目的是或考虑缩短生命。国际医学毕业生报告放弃治疗的情况较少,无论是单独放弃(RRR=0.30;95%CI:0.21-0.41)还是与加强缓解疼痛和症状一起放弃(RRR=0.44;0.34-0.55)。对于 2000 年或以后毕业的医生,这种情况更为普遍(RRR=1.60;1.17-2.19)。有宗教信仰的医生的 MELD 一般较少。对 2542 名死者进行了共同决策分析。当医生在国外毕业时,与患者或亲属讨论 MELD 的频率较低(OR=0.65,95%CI:0.50-0.87),而当医生最近毕业时,讨论的频率较高;医生的性别和宗教信仰没有影响。
医生的特征,包括医学教育的国家和毕业后的时间,对 MELD 和共同决策的可能性有重大影响。这些发现呼吁在医生的教育和培训方面进一步努力,以改善临终实践和沟通技巧。