Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 May;97(3):e364-e372. doi: 10.1111/aos.13879. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
To investigate the frequency of primary angle closure (PAC) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) based on a hospital population.
A total of 375 consecutive cases newly diagnosed with RVO by fluorescein fundus angiography at a single eye centre in Peking were reviewed. Gonioscopy was performed in all patients. Glaucoma was diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology. Retinal vein occlusion was classified as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), hemicentral retinal vein occlusion (HRVO), or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and as arteriovenous crossing RVO (AV-RVO), optic cup RVO (OC-RVO), optic nerve RVO without optical nerve head swelling (NONHS-RVO), or RVO with optical nerve head swelling (ONHS-RVO) based on the site of venous occlusion. Percentage of PAC or PACG for each type of RVO were calculated.
PACG had a frequency of 4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-6.9%] in 317 RVO patients [5.3% (95% CI 2.0-11.2%) in CRVO, 8.8% (95% CI 1.9-23.7%) in HRVO, and 1.9% (95% CI 0.4-5.4%) in BRVO]. Primary angle closure (PAC) had a frequency of 2.9% (95% CI 1.4-5.5%) in RVO. PAC/PACG had a frequency of 11.5% (95% CI 6.3-18.9%) in CRVO, 8.8% (95% CI 1.9-23.7%) in HRVO and 3.1% (95% CI 1.0-7.1%) in BRVO. PAC/PACG was significantly more prevalent in NONHS-RVO [18.9% (95% CI 9.4-32.0%)] than in ONHS-RVO [6.5% (95% CI 2.1-14.5%)], AV-RVO [3.1% (95% CI 0.9-7.8%)], and OC-RVO [2.3% (95% CI 0.1-12.3%)].
The overall frequency of PAC/PACG was much higher in patients with RVO (especially CRVO) than that in the general population. Eyes with PAC/PACG may undergo mechanical changes in the lamina cribrosa of the optic disc, resulting in RVO. Angle-closure conditions should be borne in mind when investigating Chinese patients with RVO.
基于医院人群调查视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者原发性房角关闭(PAC)和原发性房角关闭性青光眼(PACG)的发生频率。
对北京某单一眼科中心通过荧光素眼底血管造影新诊断的 375 例 RVO 患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均行房角镜检查。根据国际眼科地理和流行病学学会的标准诊断青光眼。根据静脉阻塞部位,将视网膜静脉阻塞分为中央视网膜静脉阻塞(CRVO)、半中央视网膜静脉阻塞(HRVO)或分支视网膜静脉阻塞(BRVO),以及动静脉交叉处视网膜静脉阻塞(AV-RVO)、视盘视网膜静脉阻塞(OC-RVO)、无视盘水肿的视神经视网膜静脉阻塞(NONHS-RVO)或视盘水肿的视神经视网膜静脉阻塞(ONHS-RVO)。计算每种 RVO 类型的 PAC 或 PACG 的百分比。
317 例 RVO 患者中 PACG 的发生率为 4.1%(95%置信区间为 2.2%-6.9%)[CRVO 中为 5.3%(95%置信区间为 2.0%-11.2%),HRVO 中为 8.8%(95%置信区间为 1.9%-23.7%),BRVO 中为 1.9%(95%置信区间为 0.4%-5.4%)]。RVO 中 PAC 的发生率为 2.9%(95%置信区间为 1.4%-5.5%)。CRVO、HRVO 和 BRVO 中 PAC/PACG 的发生率分别为 11.5%(95%置信区间为 6.3%-18.9%)、8.8%(95%置信区间为 1.9%-23.7%)和 3.1%(95%置信区间为 1.0%-7.1%)。NONHS-RVO 中 PAC/PACG 的发生率明显高于 ONHS-RVO(18.9%(95%置信区间为 9.4%-32.0%))、AV-RVO(3.1%(95%置信区间为 0.9%-7.8%))和 OC-RVO(2.3%(95%置信区间为 0.1%-12.3%))。
与普通人群相比,RVO 患者(尤其是 CRVO 患者)PAC/PACG 的总体发生率要高得多。患有 PAC/PACG 的眼睛可能会在视盘筛板处发生机械性改变,从而导致 RVO。在调查中国 RVO 患者时,应注意房角关闭情况。