Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 27;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02192-y.
To evaluate the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density in the fellow eyes of unilateral retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and further analyze the correlation between RPC density and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness.
Seventy-eight unilateral RVO patients and 70 normal controls were included in the study. OCTA was conducted with the 4.5 × 4.5-mm scan pattern centered on the optic nerve head, and the RPC density and peripapillary RNFL thickness were quantified.
The peripapillary RNFL in the RVO fellow eyes was significantly thinner than in normal controls in the average, inferior-hemisphere, inferior quadrant, and temporal quadrant (P < 0.05, respectively). The RPC density in the fellow eyes was also significantly lower in the average, inferior-hemisphere, nasal quadrant, and temporal quadrant ((P < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in RNFL thickness and RPC density between branch RVO fellow eyes and central RVO fellow eyes. Pearson's correlation analysis showed significant positive correlations between the RPC density and RNFL thickness in all measurements (P < 0.001, respectively).
The regional RPC density was reduced in the RVO fellow eyes, which might contribute to peripapillary RNFL thinning in the corresponding region, suggesting the influence of systemic risk factors on RVO. OCTA may offer new insights into the pathophysiology of RVO.
利用光相干断层扫描血管造影术(OCTA)评估单侧视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者对侧眼的视盘周围毛细血管(RPC)密度,并进一步分析 RPC 密度与视盘周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度之间的相关性。
本研究纳入了 78 例单侧 RVO 患者和 70 例正常对照者。OCTA 采用以视盘为中心的 4.5×4.5mm 扫描模式进行,定量测量 RPC 密度和视盘周围 RNFL 厚度。
与正常对照组相比,RVO 对侧眼的平均、下半部分、下象限和颞象限的视盘周围 RNFL 明显变薄(P<0.05)。对侧眼的 RPC 密度在平均、下半部分、鼻象限和颞象限也明显较低(P<0.05)。分支型 RVO 对侧眼与中央型 RVO 对侧眼的 RNFL 厚度和 RPC 密度无显著差异。Pearson 相关分析显示,所有测量部位的 RPC 密度与 RNFL 厚度均呈显著正相关(P<0.001)。
RVO 对侧眼的局部 RPC 密度降低,这可能导致相应区域的视盘周围 RNFL 变薄,提示全身性危险因素对 RVO 的影响。OCTA 可能为 RVO 的病理生理学提供新的见解。