优秀大学生运动员的运动和运动位置的身体成分变量。
Body Composition Variables by Sport and Sport-Position in Elite Collegiate Athletes.
机构信息
Health and Human Performance, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia.
Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
出版信息
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3153-3159. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002865.
Fields, JB, Merrigan, JJ, White, JB, and Jones, MT. Body composition variables by sport and sport-position in elite collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 32(11): 3153-3159, 2018-To assess body composition measures by sport and sport-position. Elite collegiate athletes participated (n = 475): men's and women's soccer (MSOC, n = 67; WSOC, n = 110); men's and women's swimming (MSWIM, n = 26; WSWIM, n = 22); men's and women's track and field (MTF, n = 29; WTF, n = 24); women's lacrosse and volleyball (WLAX, n = 84; WVB, n = 73); and baseball (BASE, n = 40). One-way analysis of variances assessed differences across sport and sport-position. Post hoc analysis was Tukey honestly significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). For men, BASE and MSWIM had the highest body fat percentage (BF%) (BASE: 16.3 ± 5.2%; MSWIM: 14.2 ± 3.5%). MSOC (11.5 ± 5.3%, 0.13 ± 0.72 kg) and MTF (9.8 ± 5.1%, 0.11 ± 0.08 kg) had the lowest BF% and fat mass (FM)-to-fat-free mass (FFM) ratio (FM:FFM). Fat mass did not differ between MSOC (9.1 ± 4.9 kg), MTF (7.7 ± 5.9 kg), and MSWIM (11.1 ± 3.1 kg). Fat mass for MSOC and MTF was lower than BASE (14.1 ± 5.2). For women, WVB displayed the highest BF% (25.4 ± 5.1%), FM (18.5 ± 5.2 kg), FFM (53.3 ± 5.1 kg), and body mass (BM) (71.8 ± 8.4 kg), but did not differ from WSWIM in BF%, FM, FFM, and BM. WTF had the lowest BF% (12.9 ± 4.0%), FM (7.5 ± 2.5 kg), BM (58.2 ± 4.4 kg), and FM:FFM (0.15 ± 0.05 kg). VB had the highest FFM (53.3 ± 5.1 kg). Body composition differences were observed between sport-positions (p < 0.01). Body composition differed across sport and sport-position, which may be attributed to sport-specific physiological demands.
菲尔兹，JB，梅里根，JJ，怀特，JB，和琼斯，MT。优秀大学生运动员的运动和运动位置的身体成分变量。J 强能力研究 32(11):3153-3159，2018-评估运动和运动位置的身体成分测量。优秀大学生运动员参加了(n=475):男子和女子足球(MSOC，n=67;WSOC，n=110);男子和女子游泳(MSWIM，n=26;WSWIM，n=22);男子和女子田径(MTF，n=29;WTF，n=24);女子曲棍球和排球(WLAX，n=84;WVB，n=73);和棒球(BASE，n=40)。单因素方差分析评估了运动和运动位置之间的差异。事后分析是 Tukey 诚实显著差异(p≤0.05)。对于男性，BASE 和 MSWIM 的体脂百分比(%)最高(BASE:16.3±5.2%;MSWIM:14.2±3.5%)。MSOC(11.5±5.3%，0.13±0.72kg)和 MTF(9.8±5.1%，0.11±0.08kg)的 BF%和脂肪质量(FM)-脂肪质量(FFM)比最低(FM:FFM)。MSOC(9.1±4.9kg)、MTF(7.7±5.9kg)和 MSWIM(11.1±3.1kg)之间的脂肪质量没有差异。MSOC 和 MTF 的脂肪质量低于 BASE(14.1±5.2)。对于女性，WVB 的 BF%最高(25.4±5.1%)，FM(18.5±5.2kg)，FFM(53.3±5.1kg)和体重(BM)(71.8±8.4kg)，但 BF%、FM、FFM 和 BM 与 WSWIM 无差异。WTF 的 BF%最低(12.9±4.0%)，FM(7.5±2.5kg)，BM(58.2±4.4kg)和 FM:FFM(0.15±0.05kg)。VB 的 FFM 最高(53.3±5.1kg)。运动位置之间观察到身体成分差异(p<0.01)。运动和运动位置的身体成分不同，这可能归因于特定运动的生理需求。
Zotero 插件