• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对遗传性癌症风险的亲属进行级联遗传检测:在线倡议的结果。

Cascade Genetic Testing of Relatives for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Results of an Online Initiative.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Department of Scientific Affairs, Color Genomics, Burlingame, CA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jan 1;111(1):95-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy147.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djy147
PMID:30239769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6335111/
Abstract

In cascade testing, genetic testing for an identified familial pathogenic variant extends to disease-free relatives to allow genetically targeted disease prevention. We evaluated the results of an online initiative in which carriers of 1 of 30 cancer-associated genes, or their first-degree relatives, could offer low-cost testing to at-risk first-degree relatives. In the first year, 1101 applicants invited 2280 first-degree relatives to undergo genetic testing. Of invited relatives, 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 45.5 to 49.6%) underwent genetic testing, and 12.0% (95% CI = 9.2 to 14.8%) who tested positive continued the cascade by inviting additional relatives to test. Of tested relatives, 4.9% (95% CI = 3.8 to 6.1%) had a pathogenic variant in a different gene from the known familial one, and 16.8% (95% CI = 14.7 to 18.8%) had a variant of uncertain significance. These results suggest that an online, low-cost program is an effective approach to implementing cascade testing, and that up to 5% of the general population may carry a pathogenic variant in 1 of 30 cancer-associated genes.

摘要

在级联检测中,对已确定的家族致病性变异进行基因检测可扩展至无疾病亲属,以进行有针对性的遗传疾病预防。我们评估了一项在线计划的结果,该计划允许 30 种癌症相关基因之一的携带者或其一级亲属对有风险的一级亲属进行低成本检测。在第一年,有 1101 名申请人邀请了 2280 名一级亲属进行基因检测。在受邀亲属中,有 47.5%(95%置信区间[CI] = 45.5 至 49.6%)接受了基因检测,其中 12.0%(95% CI = 9.2 至 14.8%)检测呈阳性的亲属继续通过邀请其他亲属进行检测来级联。在接受检测的亲属中,有 4.9%(95% CI = 3.8 至 6.1%)在与已知家族基因不同的基因中携带致病性变异,有 16.8%(95% CI = 14.7 至 18.8%)携带意义不明的变异。这些结果表明,在线、低成本计划是实施级联检测的有效方法,多达 5%的普通人群可能在 30 种癌症相关基因之一中携带致病性变异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa18/6335111/60ea74c613cc/djy147f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa18/6335111/bb886485ac7b/djy147f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa18/6335111/60ea74c613cc/djy147f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa18/6335111/bb886485ac7b/djy147f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa18/6335111/60ea74c613cc/djy147f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cascade Genetic Testing of Relatives for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Results of an Online Initiative.对遗传性癌症风险的亲属进行级联遗传检测:在线倡议的结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jan 1;111(1):95-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy147.
2
Cascade testing for hereditary cancer: comprehensive multigene panels identify unexpected actionable findings in relatives.级联检测遗传性癌症:综合多基因panel 可在亲属中发现意外的可操作的发现。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Feb 8;116(2):334-337. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad203.
3
Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
4
Cascade genetic testing: an underutilized pathway to equitable cancer care?级联基因检测:实现公平癌症护理的未充分利用途径?
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):141-145. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00367-2. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
Cascade Genetic Risk Education and Testing in Families With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Pilot Study.遗传性癌症综合征家族的级联遗传风险教育和检测:一项试点研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e848-e858. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00677. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
8
What happens in the long term: Uptake of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies among at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants detected via cascade testing.长期来看:通过级联检测发现致病性变异的高危亲属中癌症监测和预防策略的采用情况。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4241-4250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34482. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
9
Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.基于诊断后癌症基因检测的级联分析:一种替代基于人群的筛查方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1398-1408. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02010. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Cascade testing for hereditary cancer in Singapore: how population genomics help guide clinical policy.新加坡遗传性癌症的级联检测:人群基因组学如何指导临床决策。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00376-1. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Health History Completeness in Prenatal Genetic Counseling: An Exploratory Study at a Single University Hospital.产前遗传咨询中家族健康史的完整性:在一所大学医院进行的探索性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 6;13(17):2233. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172233.
2
Metaphors and Stigma in Confucian Culture: A Qualitative Study of Cancer Risk Communication Dilemmas for Cascade Screening Among Hereditary Cancer Families From China.儒家文化中的隐喻与污名:对中国遗传性癌症家庭级联筛查中癌症风险沟通困境的质性研究
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70205. doi: 10.1002/pon.70205.
3
Parental Communication With their Children about Cancer Risk and DTC Cascade Genetic Testing: Implications for Genetic Education and Counseling.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.电话与当面传递种系癌症基因检测结果的随机非劣效性试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):985-993. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy015.
2
Patient communication of cancer genetic test results in a diverse population.在不同人群中进行癌症基因检测结果的患者沟通。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):85-94. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx010.
3
Cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia: Practical consequences.家族性高胆固醇血症的级联筛查:实际影响。
父母与子女就癌症风险及直接面向消费者的级联基因检测进行的沟通:对基因教育与咨询的启示
Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Sep;197(9):e64115. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.64115. Epub 2025 May 13.
4
Association between proband characteristics and CDH1 cascade genetic testing uptake in at-risk relatives.先证者特征与高危亲属中CDH1级联基因检测接受情况之间的关联。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70011. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70011.
5
Deficits of Molecular Prognosis/Diagnosis Studies in Underserved Populations.服务不足人群的分子预后/诊断研究的缺陷。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Nov;20(11):1515-1522. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00131. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
6
Factors Impacting Intent to Share Multigenic Cancer Testing Results in a Community Hospital Setting.社区医院环境中影响分享多基因癌症检测结果意愿的因素
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):987. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090987.
7
Genetic Counseling, Testing, and Family Communication Into Survivorship After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌诊断后的遗传咨询、检测和家庭沟通:生存问题
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 10;42(26):3123-3129. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00122. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
8
High-risk pathogenic germline variants in blood relatives of BRCA1/2 negative probands.BRCA1/2 阴性先证者的血缘亲属中的高危致病性种系变异。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1028-1036. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01615-0. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
9
Familial communication and cascade testing following elective genomic testing.选择性基因检测后的家族沟通与级联检测
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1907. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1907. Epub 2024 May 16.
10
Expanding access to genetic testing for pancreatic cancer.扩大胰腺癌基因检测的可及性。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Aug;23(3):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00389-w. Epub 2024 May 11.
Atheroscler Suppl. 2017 Nov;30:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing.家族性高胆固醇血症的级联筛查与基因检测的应用
JAMA. 2017 Jul 25;318(4):381-382. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8543.
5
Traceback: A Proposed Framework to Increase Identification and Genetic Counseling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Through Family-Based Outreach.回溯:一个通过基于家庭的外展服务来增加BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者的识别与遗传咨询的提议框架。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2329-2337. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3439. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌患者的癌症易感基因突变
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;35(10):1086-1095. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0012. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
Impact of Payer Constraints on Access to Genetic Testing.支付方限制对基因检测可及性的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jan;13(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013581. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
8
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺和卵巢,2017 年第 2 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jan;15(1):9-20. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0003.
9
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.BRCA1/2基因咨询电话服务与面对面咨询的随机非劣效性试验:1年随访
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2914-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9557. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer.一系列乳腺癌患者中25个癌症易感基因的胚系突变频率
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1460-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747. Epub 2016 Mar 14.