Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):567-573. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27891. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
In this substudy of the SORT OUT VII trial, the clinical outcomes among patient with diabetes mellitus treated with Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES; Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland) or Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (N-BES; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) were compared.
Diabetes is associated with increased risk of target lesion failure (TLF) after percutaneous coronary intervention.
In total, 2525 patients were randomized to stent implantation with O-SES (n = 1261, diabetes: n = 236) or N-BES (n = 1264, diabetes: n = 235). The primary endpoint, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 2 years.
At 2 year, TLF did not differ between O-SES vs N-BES in diabetic (9.3% vs 9.4%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.78) patients. The individual components of the primary endpoint did not differ among stent type. In diabetics, cardiac death occurred in 3% of O-SES-treated and in 3.8% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.29-2.08), MI occurred in 3.0% of O-SES-treated and in 3.8% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.28-2.06) and TLR occurred in 5,5% of O-SES-treated and in 6.0% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.43-1.95).
TLF did not differ between O-SES- and N-BES-treated diabetic patients.
在 SORT OUT VII 试验的这项子研究中,比较了接受 Orsiro 西罗莫司洗脱支架(O-SES;Biotronik,比拉赫,瑞士)或 Nobori 依维莫司洗脱支架(N-BES;Terumo,东京,日本)治疗的糖尿病患者的临床结局。
糖尿病与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变失败(TLF)风险增加相关。
共 2525 例患者随机接受 O-SES(n = 1261,糖尿病:n = 236)或 N-BES(n = 1264,糖尿病:n = 235)支架植入。主要终点 TLF 是 2 年内心源性死亡、靶病变心肌梗死(MI)或靶病变血运重建(TLR)的复合终点。
在糖尿病患者中,2 年时 O-SES 与 N-BES 之间 TLF 无差异(9.3%比 9.4%;RR 0.98,95%CI 0.54-1.78)。支架类型之间主要终点的各个组成部分没有差异。在糖尿病患者中,O-SES 治疗组的心脏死亡发生率为 3%,N-BES 治疗组为 3.8%(RR 0.77,95%CI 0.29-2.08),O-SES 治疗组的 MI 发生率为 3.0%,N-BES 治疗组为 3.8%(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.28-2.06),O-SES 治疗组的 TLR 发生率为 5.5%,N-BES 治疗组为 6.0%(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.43-1.95)。
O-SES 与 N-BES 治疗的糖尿病患者之间 TLF 无差异。