Galizzi Nadia, Galli Laura, Poli Andrea, Spagnuolo Vincenzo, Castagna Antonella, Gianotti Nicola
Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, via Stamira D'Ancona 20, 20127 Milano, Italy.
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy.
New Microbiol. 2018 Oct;41(4):256-261. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
As dolutegravir (DTG), rilpivirine (RPV) and cobicistat affect creatinine, but not cystatin C, tubular transport or serum concentration, the aim of the study was to compare estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) calculated by means of a standard creatinine formula with those calculated by means of the cystatin C formula in patients receiving these drugs. This was a cross-sectional study of HIV-1 infected patients with eGFR <90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI-creatinine formula) on-treatment with regimens including DTG, RVP or cobicistat; cystatin C was measured after the switch to these regimens. eGFR was calculated by means of the CKD-EPI formulas (CKD-EPI-creatinine: eGFRcrea; CKD-EPI-cystatin C: eGFRcyst). eGFRcyst was compared with the last eGFR assessed before (eGFRcrea pre) and after the switch (eGFRcrea post). The primary end-point of the study was the difference between eGFRcyst and eGFRcrea post. One hundred and twenty patients were included. eGFRcrea pre was 80 (70-92) ml/min/1.73 m2. eGFRcrea post was significantly lower than eGFRcyst (65 [59-75] vs. 80 [69-95] mL/ min/1.73m2; p<0.001); eGFRcyst did not differ from eGFRcrea pre (p=0.544). The difference between eGFRcyst and eGFRcrea post was not significantly different among regimen groups (p=0.056). In HIV-patients with reduced eGFR treated with DTG, RPV or cobicistat, measuring eGFR by means of the CKD-EPI cystatin C formula is probably more relevant.
由于多替拉韦(DTG)、利匹韦林(RPV)和考比司他会影响肌酐,但不影响胱抑素C、肾小管转运或血清浓度,本研究的目的是比较接受这些药物治疗的患者中,通过标准肌酐公式计算的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)与通过胱抑素C公式计算的eGFR。这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为接受包含DTG、RVP或考比司他的治疗方案且eGFR<90 ml/min/1.73 m2(CKD-EPI-肌酐公式)的HIV-1感染患者;在换用这些治疗方案后测量胱抑素C。通过CKD-EPI公式计算eGFR(CKD-EPI-肌酐:eGFRcrea;CKD-EPI-胱抑素C:eGFRcyst)。将eGFRcyst与换用治疗方案前(eGFRcrea pre)和换用后(eGFRcrea post)评估的最后一次eGFR进行比较。该研究的主要终点是eGFRcyst与eGFRcrea post之间的差异。共纳入120例患者。eGFRcrea pre为80(70-92)ml/min/1.73 m2。eGFRcrea post显著低于eGFRcyst(65[59-75] vs. 80[69-95] mL/min/1.73m2;p<0.001);eGFRcyst与eGFRcrea pre无差异(p=0.544)。各治疗方案组中,eGFRcyst与eGFRcrea post之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.056)。在接受DTG、RPV或考比司他治疗且eGFR降低的HIV患者中,采用CKD-EPI胱抑素C公式测量eGFR可能更具相关性。