Department of Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5270-5276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802864115. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
In this paper we present a simple model for assessing the willingness to pay for reductions in the risk associated with catastrophic climate change. The model is extremely tractable and applies to a multiregion world but with global externalities and has five key features: () Neither the occurrence nor the costs of a catastrophic event in any one year are precisely predictable; () the probability of a catastrophe occurring in any one year increases as the levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increase; () greenhouse gases are a worldwide public bad with emissions from any one country or region increasing the risks for all; () there is two-sided irreversibility; if nothing is done and the problem proves serious, the climate, economic activity, and human life will suffer permanent damage, but if we spend large sums on countermeasures and the problem turns out to be minor or even nonexistent, we will have wasted resources unnecessarily; and () technological progress may yield partial or even complete solutions. The framework that we propose can give a sense of the quantitative significance of mitigation strategies. We illustrate these for a core set of parameter values.
本文提出了一个简单的模型,用于评估对降低与灾难性气候变化相关风险的支付意愿。该模型非常易于处理,适用于多区域世界,但具有全球性外部性,具有五个关键特征:(1)在任何一年中灾难性事件的发生与否及其成本都无法准确预测;(2)大气中温室气体水平的增加会增加任何一年发生灾难的概率;(3)温室气体是一种全球性的公共危害,任何一个国家或地区的排放都会增加所有国家的风险;(4)存在双向不可逆性;如果什么都不做,问题变得严重,气候、经济活动和人类生命将遭受永久性损害,但如果我们花费大量资金采取对策,而问题结果是轻微的,甚至不存在,我们将不必要地浪费资源;(5)技术进步可能会产生部分甚至完全的解决方案。我们提出的框架可以让人们了解缓解策略的数量意义。我们用一组核心参数值来说明这些。