Nwachukwu Benedict U, Rauck Ryan C, Kahlenberg Cynthia A, Nwachukwu Chukwuma, Schairer William W, Williams Riley J, Altchek David W, Allen Answorth A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA.
HSS J. 2018 Oct;14(3):322-327. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9621-9. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
As the use of biologic therapies for the management of knee pathology continues to expand, it is more likely that patients will turn to the Internet to gather information on this topic. Given the lack of scientific consensus on the use of biologics, care providers must understand what information is available online.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of websites that patients may use to educate themselves on knee biologics.
Websites were identified using search terms relevant to multiple biologic therapies available for knee pathology. Websites were scored based on an author-derived grading rubric, with a total of 25 possible points relating to the role of knee biologics in the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of knee pathology. Websites were categorized based on the source (e.g., physician-operated website vs. industry-related website). Reading level was assessed with the Flesch-Kincaid readability test.
The initial search yielded 375 results, with 96 websites meeting final inclusion criteria. Mean website score was poor, at 6.01 of the 25 possible points (24.0%). Physician websites were the most common, with 60% of the articles identified. Industry-related websites scored the lowest (mean, 3.2 ± 0.97) while hospital-related websites scored the highest (mean, 8.3 ± 2.93). Overall, websites published from hospitals or orthopedic professional societies had significantly higher scores than other websites. The search term "knee PRP" yielded higher-quality results than "knee platelet rich plasma." Similarly, "knee BMAC" led to better results than "knee bone marrow aspirate concentrate." The average reading level was 11.4.
Many online resources are available for patients seeking information about knee biologic therapies, but the quality of websites identified was very poor. Patients should be counseled that the information available online for knee biologic therapy is unreliable. Surgeons should play an increased role in providing resources to patients and educating them on biologic options.
随着生物疗法在膝关节疾病治疗中的应用不断扩大,患者更有可能通过互联网获取有关该主题的信息。鉴于在生物制剂使用方面缺乏科学共识,医疗服务提供者必须了解网上有哪些信息。
问题/目的:本研究的目的是评估患者可能用于自我了解膝关节生物制剂的网站质量。
使用与多种可用于膝关节疾病的生物疗法相关的搜索词来识别网站。根据作者制定的评分标准对网站进行评分,共有25分与膝关节生物制剂在膝关节疾病诊断、评估和治疗中的作用相关。网站根据来源进行分类(例如,医生运营的网站与行业相关网站)。使用弗莱什-金凯德可读性测试评估阅读水平。
初步搜索产生375个结果,96个网站符合最终纳入标准。网站平均得分较低,在25分中得6.01分(24.0%)。医生网站最为常见,所识别的文章中有60%来自此类网站。行业相关网站得分最低(平均3.2±0.97),而医院相关网站得分最高(平均8.3±2.93)。总体而言,医院或骨科专业协会发布的网站得分明显高于其他网站。搜索词“膝关节PRP”产生的结果质量高于“膝关节富血小板血浆”。同样,“膝关节BMAC”比“膝关节骨髓抽吸浓缩物”产生的结果更好。平均阅读水平为11.4。
对于寻求膝关节生物疗法信息的患者来说,有许多在线资源可用,但所识别网站的质量非常差。应告知患者,网上有关膝关节生物疗法的信息不可靠。外科医生应在为患者提供资源并就生物制剂选择对他们进行教育方面发挥更大作用。