• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individuals Frequently Search Google With Questions About the Management of Meniscal Tears and the Indications for and Technical Details of Surgery but the Quality of the Information Is Suboptimal.人们经常在谷歌上搜索有关半月板撕裂治疗、手术适应症及技术细节的问题,但信息质量欠佳。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 9;7(2):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101061. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.患者在网上搜索半月板手术时会遇到什么?互联网趋势分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):23259671231219014. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219014. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Patient-Directed Online Education for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Release: Analysis of What Patients Ask and Quality of Resources.面向腕管综合征及松解术患者的在线指导教育:患者问题及资源质量分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Aug 26;5(6):818-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.015. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Analysis of patient-directed search content and online resource quality for ulnar collateral ligament injury and surgery.尺侧副韧带损伤及手术的患者导向搜索内容与在线资源质量分析
JSES Int. 2023 Dec 14;8(2):384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.017. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?-frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources.我们的患者在谷歌上询问了哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?——常见的在线问题及在线资源质量
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Feb 27;4(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Patients With Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Obtain Information Regarding Diagnosis, Management, and Recovery from Low-Quality Online Resources.后交叉韧带损伤患者从低质量的在线资源中获取关于诊断、治疗和康复的信息。
Phys Sportsmed. 2024 Dec;52(6):601-607. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2346462. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
Modern Internet Search Analytics and Osseointegration: What are Patients Asking and Reading Online?现代互联网搜索分析与骨整合:患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023 Sep-Dec;18(3):163-168. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1603.
8
What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches for rotator cuff repair.患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?对在线患者搜索肩袖修复的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Nov;32(11):2245-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 30.
9
Indications for Surgery, Activities After Surgery, and Pain Are the Most Commonly Asked Questions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction.手术适应症、术后活动及疼痛是前交叉韧带损伤与重建中最常被问到的问题。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 17;5(5):100805. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100805. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Online patients questions regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pertain to timeline of recovery, specific activities, and limitations.在线患者关于反式全肩关节置换术的问题涉及恢复时间线、特定活动及限制。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Oct 19;5(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.09.005. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of patient-directed search content and online resource quality for ulnar collateral ligament injury and surgery.尺侧副韧带损伤及手术的患者导向搜索内容与在线资源质量分析
JSES Int. 2023 Dec 14;8(2):384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.017. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Patient-Directed Online Education for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Release: Analysis of What Patients Ask and Quality of Resources.面向腕管综合征及松解术患者的在线指导教育:患者问题及资源质量分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Aug 26;5(6):818-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.015. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy for traumatic meniscal tears in patients aged under 45 years.关节镜下半月板部分切除术与物理治疗治疗 45 岁以下创伤性半月板撕裂的成本效益比较。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Nov 1;105-B(11):1177-1183. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B11.BJJ-2023-0107.R1.
4
Analyzing the Quality and Readability of Online Hyaluronic Acid Knee Injection Resources.分析在线透明质酸膝关节注射资源的质量和可读性。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43225. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers?肩袖修复术:患者在网上问哪些问题,他们从哪里获得答案?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01235. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources.在线脊柱患者教育资源的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e640-e644. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.091. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
7
The Epidemiology of Meniscus Injury.半月板损伤的流行病学。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Sep 1;29(3):e24-e33. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000329.
8
Low back pain: What is the role of YouTube content in patient education?腰痛:YouTube内容在患者教育中扮演着什么角色?
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):901-908. doi: 10.1002/jor.25104. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
9
A systematic review about long-term results after meniscus repair.关于半月板修复后长期结果的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 May;142(5):835-844. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03906-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Modern Internet Search Analytics and Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Are Patients Asking and Reading Online?现代互联网搜索分析与全膝关节置换术:患者在网上查询和阅读什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1224-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

人们经常在谷歌上搜索有关半月板撕裂治疗、手术适应症及技术细节的问题,但信息质量欠佳。

Individuals Frequently Search Google With Questions About the Management of Meniscal Tears and the Indications for and Technical Details of Surgery but the Quality of the Information Is Suboptimal.

作者信息

Spaan Jonathan, Streepy John, Hodakowski Alexander, Hummel Amelia, Mowers Colton, Schundler Sabrina, McCormick Johnathon R, Riboh Jonathan, Piasecki Dana, Chahla Jorge

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 9;7(2):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101061. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101061
PMID:40297101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034050/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the frequently asked questions that patients search online regarding meniscal tears and meniscal surgery and evaluate the quality of websites used to answer these common queries.

METHODS

This study used Google's People Also Ask function to extract the most common 300 questions and associated Web pages regarding meniscal tears and meniscal surgery. Questions on both meniscal tear and meniscal surgery were categorized using the Rothwell classification, and websites were evaluated with (JAMA) criteria.

RESULTS

The Rothwell classification of questions on meniscal tear/surgery was 54.0%/55% fact, 37.7%/30.0% policy, and 8.3%/15.0% value. The meniscal tear cohort asked significantly more questions related to policy ( = .047), whereas the meniscal surgery cohort asked significantly more questions about value ( = .011). Academic (31.7% and 27.3%), medical practice (23.0% and 25.3%), and single-surgeon (12.3% and 13.3%) websites were the most common types of sites encountered. The mean total JAMA score was 1.3 of 4, with journals (mean, 3.4) having the highest score. Single-surgeon practice (mean, 0.5) and legal (mean, 0) sites had the lowest JAMA scores. The most frequently encountered query in the meniscal tear cohort was "What are three signs of a meniscus tear in the knee?" In contrast, in the meniscal surgery cohort, it was a tie between "What is the fastest way to recover from meniscus surgery?" and "Should meniscus surgery be done over 65?"

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of online information related to meniscal tears and surgery is often suboptimal based on objective measures of value. Individuals frequently search for insights into indications, management, and technical details.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding common themes in online searches can provide valuable insights that could improve patient education. Surgeons can use this information to anticipate potential questions, establish appropriate patient expectations, and enhance informed decisions.

摘要

目的

分析患者在网上搜索的有关半月板撕裂和半月板手术的常见问题,并评估用于回答这些常见问题的网站质量。

方法

本研究使用谷歌的“人们也问”功能,提取了关于半月板撕裂和半月板手术最常见的300个问题及相关网页。半月板撕裂和半月板手术的问题均采用罗斯韦尔分类法进行分类,并根据《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)标准对网站进行评估。

结果

半月板撕裂/手术问题的罗斯韦尔分类为事实类占54.0%/55%,政策类占37.7%/30.0%,价值观类占8.3%/15.0%。半月板撕裂组提出的与政策相关的问题显著更多(P = 0.047),而半月板手术组提出的关于价值观的问题显著更多(P = 0.011)。学术网站(31.7%和27.3%)、医疗实践网站(23.0%和25.3%)以及单医生网站(12.3%和13.3%)是最常见的网站类型。JAMA总分平均为4分中的1.3分,期刊网站(平均3.4分)得分最高。单医生诊所网站(平均0.5分)和法律网站(平均0分)的JAMA得分最低。半月板撕裂组最常遇到的问题是“膝盖半月板撕裂的三个迹象是什么?”相比之下,在半月板手术组中,“从半月板手术中恢复的最快方法是什么?”和“65岁以上的人是否应该做半月板手术?”并列。

结论

根据客观的价值衡量标准,与半月板撕裂和手术相关的在线信息质量往往不理想。人们经常搜索有关适应症、治疗和技术细节的见解。

临床意义

了解在线搜索中的常见主题可以提供有价值的见解,有助于改善患者教育。外科医生可以利用这些信息来预测潜在问题,建立适当的患者期望,并加强明智的决策。