Nanomedicine Lab, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
National Graphene Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Nov;92(11):3359-3379. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2303-z. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Graphene oxide (GO) is an oxidised form of graphene that has attracted commercial interest in multiple applications, including inks, printed electronics and spray coatings, which all raise health concerns due to potential creation of inhalable aerosols. Although a number of studies have discussed the toxicity of GO sheets, the in vivo impact of their lateral dimensions is still not clear. Here, we compared the effects of large GO sheets (l-GO, 1-20 µm) with those of small GO sheets (s-GO, < 1 µm) in terms of mesothelial damage and peritoneal inflammation, after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection in mice. To benchmark the outcomes, long and rigid multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) that were shown to be associated with asbestos-like pathogenicity on the mesothelium were also tested. Our aim was to assess whether lateral dimensions can be a predictor of inflammogenicity for GO sheets in a similar fashion as length is for MWCNTs. While long MWCNTs dispersed in 0.5% BSA induced a granulomatous response on the diaphragmatic mesothelium and immune cell recruitment to the peritoneal cavity, GO sheets dispersed under similar conditions did not cause any response, regardless of their lateral dimensions. We further interrogated whether tuning the surface reactivity of GO by testing different dispersions (5% dextrose instead of 0.5% BSA) may change the biological outcome. Although the change of dispersion did not alter the impact of GO on the mesothelium (i.e. no granuloma), we observed that, when dispersed in protein-free 5% dextrose solution, s-GO elicited a greater recruitment of monocytic cells to the peritoneal cavity than l-GO, or when dispersed in protein-containing solution. Such recruitment coincided with the greater ability of s-GO to interact in vivo with peritoneal macrophages and was associated with a greater surface reactivity in comparison to l-GO. In conclusion, large dimension was not a determining factor of the immunological impact of GO sheets after i.p. administration. For an equal dose, GO sheets with lateral dimensions similar to the length of long MWCNTs were less pathogenic than the MWCNTs. On the other hand, surface reactivity and the ability of some smaller GO sheets to interact more readily with immune cells seem to be key parameters that can be tuned to improve the safety profile of GO. In particular, the choice of dispersion modality, which affected these two parameters, was found to be of crucial importance in the assessment of GO impact in this model. Overall, these findings are essential for a better understanding of the parameters governing GO toxicity and inflammation, and the rational design of safe GO-based formulations for various applications, including biomedicine.
氧化石墨烯(GO)是石墨烯的一种氧化形式,在多种应用中引起了商业兴趣,包括油墨、印刷电子和喷涂涂料,由于可能产生可吸入的气溶胶,所有这些应用都引起了健康方面的担忧。尽管许多研究都讨论了 GO 片的毒性,但它们的横向尺寸对体内的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们比较了大尺寸 GO 片(l-GO,1-20 µm)和小尺寸 GO 片(s-GO,<1 µm)在腹腔内(i.p.)注射后对间皮损伤和腹膜炎症的影响。为了进行基准测试,我们还测试了长而硬的多壁碳纳米管(MWCNTs),它们在间皮上表现出与石棉样致病性相关的特性。我们的目的是评估横向尺寸是否可以像长度对于 MWCNTs 一样,成为预测 GO 片致炎能力的一个指标。虽然长 MWCNTs 分散在 0.5% BSA 中会在膈肌间皮上引起肉芽肿反应,并将免疫细胞募集到腹腔中,但在类似条件下分散的 GO 片不会引起任何反应,无论其横向尺寸如何。我们进一步研究了通过测试不同分散体(5%葡萄糖代替 0.5% BSA)来调整 GO 的表面反应性是否会改变生物学结果。尽管分散体的变化并没有改变 GO 对间皮的影响(即没有肉芽肿),但我们观察到,当分散在无蛋白的 5%葡萄糖溶液中时,s-GO 比 l-GO 更能募集单核细胞到腹腔中,或者当分散在含蛋白的溶液中时。这种募集与 s-GO 与腹腔巨噬细胞在体内相互作用的能力更强有关,并且与 l-GO 相比,s-GO 的表面反应性更高。总之,在腹腔内给药后,大尺寸并不是 GO 片免疫影响的决定因素。对于相同剂量,具有类似于长 MWCNTs 长度的横向尺寸的 GO 片比 MWCNTs 的致病性更小。另一方面,表面反应性和一些较小的 GO 片更易于与免疫细胞相互作用的能力似乎是可以调节的关键参数,以改善 GO 的安全性。特别是,影响这两个参数的分散模式的选择被发现是评估该模型中 GO 影响的关键因素。总的来说,这些发现对于更好地理解控制 GO 毒性和炎症的参数以及合理设计用于各种应用(包括生物医学)的安全 GO 制剂至关重要。