Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.
Department of Health Administration, Furukawa Electric Corporation.
J Occup Health. 2018 Nov 27;60(6):485-493. doi: 10.1539/joh.2017-0298-OA. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
To investigate associations of work-related stressors and their changes over time with the risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Japanese manufacturing workers.
Participants were 1,040 employees aged 19 to 68 years who were free from MetS at baseline and completed the three year-interval follow-up survey. MetS was defined according to the Joint Interim Statement. Work-related stressors (job strain, job demands, job control, and worksite social support) were assessed based on the Job Content Questionnaire and were split into two categories (low and high) by the median value at each survey. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the associations of baseline work-related stressors and their changes over time with the incidence of MetS.
Three years later, 61 workers developed MetS. Higher job demands at baseline were significantly associated with a lower risk of MetS (adjusted odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidential interval: 0.24, 0.89). In the analyses of the changes in stressors over time, those whose job demands changed from low to high showed significantly higher risk of MetS (adjusted odds ratio 3.27, 95% confidential interval: 1.46, 7.34), compared with those who reported low job demands in both surveys.
Results suggest that an increase in job demands over time, but not higher job demands at baseline, is associated with increased risk of MetS.
研究与工作相关的压力源及其随时间的变化与日本制造业工人代谢综合征(MetS)发病风险的关系。
参与者为 1040 名年龄在 19 至 68 岁之间的员工,他们在基线时没有 MetS,并完成了三年的随访调查。MetS 根据联合临时声明进行定义。工作相关压力源(工作压力、工作需求、工作控制和工作场所社会支持)根据工作内容问卷进行评估,并根据每个调查的中位数分为低和高两类。多变量逻辑回归用于研究基线工作相关压力源及其随时间的变化与 MetS 发病率的关系。
三年后,有 61 名工人患上了 MetS。基线时较高的工作需求与较低的 MetS 风险显著相关(调整后的优势比 0.46,95%置信区间:0.24,0.89)。在随时间变化的压力源分析中,与那些在两次调查中均报告工作需求较低的人相比,那些工作需求从低到高变化的人患 MetS 的风险显著更高(调整后的优势比 3.27,95%置信区间:1.46,7.34)。
结果表明,随着时间的推移,工作需求的增加,而不是基线时较高的工作需求,与 MetS 风险的增加有关。