• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估诊断分类模型框架中的增长。

Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework.

机构信息

Department of Education and Human Development, Clemson University, 226 Holtzendorff Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, 325P Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2018 Dec;83(4):963-990. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9638-5. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-018-9638-5
PMID:30264183
Abstract

A common assessment research design is the single-group pre-test/post-test design in which examinees are administered an assessment before instruction and then another assessment after instruction. In this type of study, the primary objective is to measure growth in examinees, individually and collectively. In an item response theory (IRT) framework, longitudinal IRT models can be used to assess growth in examinee ability over time. In a diagnostic classification model (DCM) framework, assessing growth translates to measuring changes in attribute mastery status over time, thereby providing a categorical, criterion-referenced interpretation of growth. This study introduces the Transition Diagnostic Classification Model (TDCM), which combines latent transition analysis with the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model to provide methodology for analyzing growth in a general DCM framework. Simulation study results indicate that the proposed model is flexible, provides accurate and reliable classifications, and is quite robust to violations to measurement invariance over time. The TDCM is used to analyze pre-test/post-test data from a diagnostic mathematics assessment.

摘要

一种常见的评估研究设计是单组前测/后测设计,其中被试在教学前接受一次评估,然后在教学后再接受一次评估。在这种类型的研究中,主要目的是衡量被试个体和集体的增长。在项目反应理论(IRT)框架中,可以使用纵向 IRT 模型来评估被试能力随时间的增长。在诊断分类模型(DCM)框架中,衡量增长转化为衡量属性掌握状态随时间的变化,从而为增长提供分类的、基于标准的解释。本研究引入了过渡诊断分类模型(TDCM),它将潜在过渡分析与对数线性认知诊断模型相结合,为在一般 DCM 框架中分析增长提供了方法。模拟研究结果表明,所提出的模型具有灵活性,能够提供准确可靠的分类,并且对随时间变化的测量不变性的违反具有很强的稳健性。TDCM 用于分析诊断数学评估的前测/后测数据。

相似文献

1
Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework.评估诊断分类模型框架中的增长。
Psychometrika. 2018 Dec;83(4):963-990. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9638-5. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.结合项目反应理论与诊断分类模型:一种用于能力量表编制和误解诊断的心理测量模型。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jul;79(3):403-25. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9350-4. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
3
Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.研究项目参数漂移对具有混合分布的项目反应理论模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 24;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00255. eCollection 2016.
4
The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.Q矩阵设计对对数线性认知诊断模型中分类准确性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):491-511. doi: 10.1177/0013164414539162. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
5
Growth Modeling in a Diagnostic Classification Model (DCM) Framework-A Multivariate Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Model.诊断分类模型(DCM)框架下的增长建模——一种多变量纵向诊断分类模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 7;11:1714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01714. eCollection 2020.
6
A general proof of consistency of heuristic classification for cognitive diagnosis models.认知诊断模型启发式分类一致性的一般证明。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2015 Nov;68(3):387-409. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12055. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.通过融合潜在变量和图形项目反应理论模型进行稳健测量。
Psychometrika. 2018 Sep;83(3):538-562. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9610-4. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.基于评分的成对最大似然估计的项目区分功能差异检验。
Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):132-155. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9591-8. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.广义非参数分类方法的一致性理论。
Psychometrika. 2019 Sep;84(3):830-845. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09660-x. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method.小型教育项目的认知诊断:广义非参数分类法。
Psychometrika. 2018 Jun;83(2):355-375. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9595-4. Epub 2017 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A didactic illustration of writing skill growth through a longitudinal diagnostic classification model.通过纵向诊断分类模型对写作技能增长的教学性阐释。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1521808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1521808. eCollection 2024.
2
Relative Robustness of CDMs and (M)IRT in Measuring Growth in Latent Skills.认知诊断模型(CDMs)和(单维)项目反应理论((M)IRT)在测量潜在技能增长方面的相对稳健性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Aug;83(4):808-830. doi: 10.1177/00131644221117194. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
Don't worry about the anchor-item setting in longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.使用纵向认知诊断模型评估潜在技能随时间的变化:模型性能评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;77(3):369-388. doi: 10.1177/0013164416659314. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
2
A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Assessing Change in Cognitive Skills.一种用于评估认知技能变化的潜在转变分析模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):181-204. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588946. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Using latent transition analysis in nursing research to explore change over time.
不用担心纵向学习诊断评估中的锚定项目设置。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1112463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112463. eCollection 2023.
4
A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses.关于识别二项反应受限潜在类别模型的较弱条件的注释。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):158-174. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09875-5. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
5
The Potential for Interpretational Confounding in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.认知诊断模型中解释性混淆的可能性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jun;46(4):303-320. doi: 10.1177/01466216221084207. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
6
Considerations for Fitting Dynamic Bayesian Networks With Latent Variables: A Monte Carlo Study.关于拟合具有潜在变量的动态贝叶斯网络的考量:一项蒙特卡罗研究。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Mar;46(2):116-135. doi: 10.1177/01466216211066609. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
7
On Interim Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing in Learning Context.关于学习情境中的临时认知诊断计算机自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;45(4):235-252. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990755. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
8
Sample Size Requirements for Applying Diagnostic Classification Models.应用诊断分类模型的样本量要求。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 25;11:621251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.621251. eCollection 2020.
9
A Markov Estimation Strategy for Longitudinal Learning Diagnosis: Providing Timely Diagnostic Feedback.一种用于纵向学习诊断的马尔可夫估计策略:提供及时的诊断反馈。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Dec;80(6):1145-1167. doi: 10.1177/0013164420912318. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Measuring Skill Growth and Evaluating Change: Unconditional and Conditional Approaches to Latent Growth Cognitive Diagnostic Models.测量技能增长与评估变化:潜在增长认知诊断模型的无条件和有条件方法
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:2205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02205. eCollection 2020.
运用潜过渡分析在护理研究中探索随时间的变化。
Nurs Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;60(1):73-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182001c63.
4
Latent Transition Analysis: Benefits of a Latent Variable Approach to Modeling Transitions in Substance Use.潜在转变分析:潜在变量方法在物质使用转变建模中的优势
J Drug Issues. 2010;40(1):93-120. doi: 10.1177/002204261004000106.
5
A new SAS procedure for latent transition analysis: transitions in dating and sexual risk behavior.一种用于潜在转变分析的新SAS程序:约会和性风险行为的转变
Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):446-56. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.446.
6
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.使用认知诊断模型测量心理障碍。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287.