Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2308, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;15(10):2137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102137.
: Responding to high levels of alcohol-related harm among students, a New Zealand university deployed a security and liaison service, strengthened the Student Code of Conduct, increased its input on the operation of alcohol outlets near campus, and banned alcohol advertising on campus. We estimated the change in the prevalence of alcohol consumption patterns among students at the university compared with other universities. : We conducted a controlled before-and-after study with surveys in residential colleges at the target university in 2004 and 2014, and in random samples of students at the target university and three control universities in 2005 and 2013. The primary outcome was the prevalence of recent intoxication, while we analysed drinking and drinking in selected locations to investigate mechanisms of change. : The 7-day prevalence of intoxication decreased from 45% in 2004 to 33% in 2014 (absolute difference: 12%; 95% CI: 7% to 17%) among students living in residential colleges, and from 40% in 2005 to 26% in 2013 (absolute difference: 14%; 95% CI: 8% to 20%) in the wider student body of the intervention university. The intervention effect estimate, representing the change at the intervention university adjusted for change at other universities (aOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.90), was consistent with a benefit of intervention but was not statistically significant ( = 0.17). : In this period of alcohol policy reform, drinking to intoxication decreased substantially in the targeted student population. Policy reforms and coincidental environmental changes may each have contributed to these reductions.
:为了应对学生中高比例的与酒精相关的伤害,新西兰一所大学部署了一个安全和联络服务,加强了学生行为准则,增加了对校园附近酒水销售点运营的投入,并禁止校园内的酒精广告。我们评估了与其他大学相比,该大学学生的饮酒模式流行率的变化。:我们进行了一项对照前后研究,在目标大学的住宿学院于 2004 年和 2014 年进行了调查,在目标大学和三所对照大学的随机学生样本中于 2005 年和 2013 年进行了调查。主要结果是最近醉酒的流行率,同时我们分析了饮酒和在选定地点饮酒,以探讨变化的机制。:在住宿学院中,2004 年至 2014 年间,醉酒的 7 天流行率从 45%下降到 33%(绝对差异:12%;95%CI:7%至 17%),而在干预大学的更广泛学生群体中,2005 年至 2013 年间从 40%下降到 26%(绝对差异:14%;95%CI:8%至 20%)。干预效果估计值,代表干预大学的变化,调整了其他大学的变化(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 1.30;95%CI:0.89 至 1.90),与干预的益处一致,但没有统计学意义( = 0.17)。:在这段时间的酒精政策改革中,目标学生群体中醉酒饮酒的情况大幅减少。政策改革和偶然的环境变化可能都对这些减少做出了贡献。