Suppr超能文献

成人连枷胸和肋骨骨折内固定疗效的系统评价系统评价综述。

Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults.

机构信息

York Trials Unit, Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Trauma and Orthopaedics, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e023444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023444.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Multiple systematic reviews have reported on the impact of rib fracture fixation in the presence of flail chest and multiple rib fractures, however this practice remains controversial. Our aim is to synthesise the effectiveness of surgical rib fracture fixation as evidenced by systematic reviews.

DESIGN

A systematic search identified systematic reviews comparing effectiveness of rib fracture fixation with non-operative management of adults with flail chest or unifocal non-flail rib fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Science Citation Index were last searched 17 March 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

Twelve systematic reviews were included, consisting of 3 unique randomised controlled trials and 19 non-randomised studies. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the fixation group compared with the non-operative group in flail chest; pooled estimates ranged from -4.52 days, 95% CI (-5.54 to -3.5) to -7.5 days, 95% CI (-9.9 to -5.5). Pneumonia, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay all showed a statistically significant improvement in favour of fixation for flail chest; however, all outcomes in favour of fixation had substantial heterogeneity. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in mortality. Two systematic reviews included one non-randomised studies of unifocal non-flail rib fracture population; due to limited evidence the benefits with surgery are uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthesis of the reviews has shown some potential improvement in patient outcomes with flail chest after fixation. For future review updates, meta-analysis for effectiveness may need to take into account indications and timing of surgery as a subgroup analysis to address clinical heterogeneity between primary studies. Further robust evidence is required before conclusions can be drawn of the effectiveness of surgical fixation for flail chest and in particular, unifocal non-flail rib fractures.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016053494.

摘要

目的

多项系统评价报告了连枷胸和多发性肋骨骨折患者中肋骨骨折固定的影响,但这一做法仍存在争议。我们的目的是综合评估系统评价中肋骨骨折固定的有效性。

设计

系统检索比较连枷胸或单发非连枷肋骨骨折成人手术固定与非手术治疗效果的系统评价。最后一次检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和科学引文索引是在 2017 年 3 月 17 日。使用系统评价中的偏倚风险(ROBIS)工具评估偏倚风险。主要结局是机械通气时间。

结果

共纳入 12 项系统评价,其中包括 3 项独特的随机对照试验和 19 项非随机研究。与非手术组相比,连枷胸固定组的机械通气时间更短;汇总估计值范围为-4.52 天,95%可信区间(-5.54 至-3.5)至-7.5 天,95%可信区间(-9.9 至-5.5)。肺炎、住院时间和重症监护病房住院时间均显示固定组有统计学意义的改善,但所有有利于固定的结果均存在高度异质性。两组死亡率无统计学差异。有 2 项系统评价纳入了一项单发非连枷肋骨骨折人群的非随机研究;由于证据有限,手术的益处尚不确定。

结论

综述的综合分析表明,固定治疗连枷胸后患者的某些结局可能有所改善。对于未来的综述更新,有效性的荟萃分析可能需要考虑手术的适应证和时机,作为亚组分析,以解决主要研究之间的临床异质性。在得出关于手术固定连枷胸,特别是单发非连枷肋骨骨折的有效性结论之前,还需要更多的有力证据。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016053494。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe68/6500198/f51fe374048e/bmjopen-2018-023444f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验