• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的低成本高精度痴呆诊断框架,使用全面的神经心理学评估档案。

Deep learning based low-cost high-accuracy diagnostic framework for dementia using comprehensive neuropsychological assessment profiles.

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, room 908 Bldg. 301, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Korea.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0915-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-018-0915-z
PMID:30285646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6171238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The conventional scores of the neuropsychological batteries are not fully optimized for diagnosing dementia despite their variety and abundance of information. To achieve low-cost high-accuracy diagnose performance for dementia using a neuropsychological battery, a novel framework is proposed using the response profiles of 2666 cognitively normal elderly individuals and 435 dementia patients who have participated in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD).

METHODS

The key idea of the proposed framework is to propose a cost-effective and precise two-stage classification procedure that employed Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) as a screening test and the KLOSCAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery as a diagnostic test using deep learning. In addition, an evaluation procedure of redundant variables is introduced to prevent performance degradation. A missing data imputation method is also presented to increase the robustness by recovering information loss. The proposed deep neural networks (DNNs) architecture for the classification is validated through rigorous evaluation in comparison with various classifiers.

RESULTS

The k-nearest-neighbor imputation has been induced according to the proposed framework, and the proposed DNNs for two stage classification show the best accuracy compared to the other classifiers. Also, 49 redundant variables were removed, which improved diagnostic performance and suggested the potential of simplifying the assessment. Using this two-stage framework, we could get 8.06% higher diagnostic accuracy of dementia than MMSE alone and 64.13% less cost than KLOSCAD-N alone.

CONCLUSION

The proposed framework could be applied to general dementia early detection programs to improve robustness, preciseness, and cost-effectiveness.

摘要

背景

尽管神经心理学测试的种类繁多且信息量丰富,但它们的常规评分并不能完全优化用于诊断痴呆症。为了使用神经心理学测试实现低成本、高精度的痴呆症诊断性能,我们提出了一种新的框架,该框架使用了参加韩国认知衰老和痴呆症纵向研究(KLOSCAD)的 2666 名认知正常的老年人和 435 名痴呆症患者的反应特征。

方法

该框架的关键思想是提出一种具有成本效益且精确的两阶段分类程序,该程序使用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)作为筛选测试,使用深度学习的 KLOSCAD 神经心理学评估电池作为诊断测试。此外,引入了冗余变量的评估过程,以防止性能下降。还提出了一种缺失数据插补方法,通过恢复信息丢失来提高稳健性。通过与各种分类器的严格评估比较,验证了用于分类的所提出的深度神经网络(DNN)架构。

结果

根据所提出的框架进行了 K-最近邻插补,与其他分类器相比,所提出的用于两阶段分类的 DNN 显示出最佳的准确性。此外,还去除了 49 个冗余变量,这提高了诊断性能并表明了简化评估的潜力。使用此两阶段框架,我们可以获得比 MMSE 单独使用高 8.06%的痴呆症诊断准确性,比 KLOSCAD-N 单独使用低 64.13%的成本。

结论

所提出的框架可应用于一般的痴呆症早期检测计划,以提高稳健性、精确性和成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/c4afd6dfda51/12877_2018_915_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/6aa338518b57/12877_2018_915_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/51f4c93597a1/12877_2018_915_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/9b2eddee56b6/12877_2018_915_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/0c9844e87266/12877_2018_915_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/c4afd6dfda51/12877_2018_915_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/6aa338518b57/12877_2018_915_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/51f4c93597a1/12877_2018_915_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/9b2eddee56b6/12877_2018_915_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/0c9844e87266/12877_2018_915_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3744/6171238/c4afd6dfda51/12877_2018_915_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep learning based low-cost high-accuracy diagnostic framework for dementia using comprehensive neuropsychological assessment profiles.基于深度学习的低成本高精度痴呆诊断框架,使用全面的神经心理学评估档案。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0915-z.
2
Tracking Cognitive Decline in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early-Stage Alzheimer Dementia: Mini-Mental State Examination versus Neuropsychological Battery.追踪遗忘型轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病痴呆的认知衰退:简易精神状态检查表与神经心理成套测验的比较
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):105-117. doi: 10.1159/000478520. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Is the Short Form of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) a better screening instrument for dementia in older primary care patients than the original MMSE? Results of the German study on ageing, cognition, and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe).简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的简版对于老年初级保健患者痴呆症的筛查工具而言,是否比原始MMSE更好?德国初级保健患者衰老、认知与痴呆症研究(AgeCoDe)的结果。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):895-904. doi: 10.1037/pas0000076. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
4
Validation of the Korean Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination for diagnosing Alzheimer's dementia and mild cognitive impairment in the Korean elderly.韩国版阿登布鲁克认知检查在诊断韩国老年人阿尔茨海默病性痴呆和轻度认知障碍中的效度验证
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2012;19(2):127-31. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2011.643948.
5
Combining Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Neuropsychological Assessment: A Simple and Cost-Effective Algorithm to Predict the Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.结合脑脊液生物标志物与神经心理学评估:一种预测从轻度认知障碍进展为阿尔茨海默病痴呆的简单且具成本效益的算法
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1495-1508. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160360.
6
An Abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for Dementia Screening.用于痴呆筛查的简化蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(4):413-25. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1043349. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Is the clock drawing test appropriate for screening for mild cognitive impairment?--Results of the German study on Ageing, Cognition and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe).画钟测验是否适合用于轻度认知障碍的筛查?——初级保健患者中老龄化、认知和痴呆的德国研究(AgeCoDe)的结果。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(4):365-72. doi: 10.1159/000253484. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
8
Optimized neuropsychological procedures at different stages of dementia diagnostics.痴呆诊断不同阶段的优化神经心理学程序。
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Mar 15;229-230:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.11.043. Epub 2004 Dec 29.
9
The CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery total score detects and predicts Alzheimer disease dementia with high diagnostic accuracy.CERAD神经心理学评估量表总分能够以较高的诊断准确性检测并预测阿尔茨海默病性痴呆。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;22(10):1017-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.021. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
10
[Outcome and cognitive changes of mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: a follow-up study of 47 cases].老年轻度认知障碍的结局与认知变化:47例随访研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jun 6;86(21):1441-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of a Tablet-Based Neuropsychological Test (the Hellocog) for Screening Dementia.用于筛查痴呆症的基于平板电脑的神经心理学测试(HelloCog)的信度和效度
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):655-663. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0388. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
A robust harmonization approach for cognitive data from multiple aging and dementia cohorts.一种针对来自多个衰老与痴呆队列的认知数据的强大整合方法。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Jul 26;15(3):e12453. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12453. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
3
Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test.

本文引用的文献

1
LncRNAnet: long non-coding RNA identification using deep learning.LncRNAnet:使用深度学习进行长非编码 RNA 鉴定。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 15;34(22):3889-3897. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty418.
2
Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity.深度学习提高 CRISPR-Cpf1 引导 RNA 活性预测能力。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;36(3):239-241. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4061. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
Deep learning in bioinformatics.生物信息学中的深度学习。
利用人工神经网络结合临床智能测试区分儿童不同类型的注意力缺陷多动障碍。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1067771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067771. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests.诊断试验评价。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:319-333. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_18.
5
A Comprehensive Review of Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Major Mental and Neurological Disorders and Suicide: A Biostatistical Perspective on Data Mining.重大精神和神经疾病及自杀的计算机辅助诊断综述:数据挖掘的生物统计学视角
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):393. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030393.
6
A 5-min Cognitive Task With Deep Learning Accurately Detects Early Alzheimer's Disease.一项5分钟的深度学习认知任务可准确检测早期阿尔茨海默病。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Dec 3;12:603179. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.603179. eCollection 2020.
7
A Deep Learning Approach for Missing Data Imputation of Rating Scales Assessing Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.一种用于评估注意力缺陷多动障碍的评分量表缺失数据插补的深度学习方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 17;11:673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00673. eCollection 2020.
8
Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review.大数据分析在临床决策中的经济评价:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1466-1475. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa102.
9
Analyze Informant-Based Questionnaire for The Early Diagnosis of Senile Dementia Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的用于老年痴呆症早期诊断的信息提供者问卷分析
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2019 Dec 16;8:2200106. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2959331. eCollection 2020.
Brief Bioinform. 2017 Sep 1;18(5):851-869. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw068.
4
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.神经网络中的深度学习:综述。
Neural Netw. 2015 Jan;61:85-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
Missing value imputation for microarray data: a comprehensive comparison study and a web tool.微阵列数据的缺失值插补:一项综合比较研究及网络工具
BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S12. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-S6-S12. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
Development of a screening algorithm for Alzheimer's disease using categorical verbal fluency.使用分类言语流畅性开发阿尔茨海默病筛查算法。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 2;9(1):e84111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084111. eCollection 2014.
7
Improvement of dementia screening accuracy of mini-mental state examination by education-adjustment and supplementation of frontal assessment battery performance.通过教育调整和补充额叶评估电池性能来提高简易精神状态检查对痴呆症的筛查准确性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Oct;28(10):1522-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1522. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
8
Altered categorization of semantic knowledge in Korean patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病韩国患者语义知识分类的改变。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;36(1):41-8. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122458.
9
Data mining methods in the prediction of Dementia: A real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests.痴呆预测中的数据挖掘方法:线性判别分析、逻辑回归、神经网络、支持向量机、分类树和随机森林在准确性、敏感性和特异性方面的实际数据比较。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Aug 17;4:299. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-299.
10
The CERAD Neuropsychologic Battery Total Score and the progression of Alzheimer disease.CERAD 神经心理学电池总评分与阿尔茨海默病的进展。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010 Apr-Jun;24(2):138-42. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181b76415.