Lin I-Cheng, Chang Shen-Chieh, Huang Yu-Jui, Kuo Terry B J, Chiu Hung-Wen
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1067771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067771. eCollection 2022.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-studied topic in child and adolescent psychiatry. ADHD diagnosis relies on information from an assessment scale used by teachers and parents and psychological assessment by physicians; however, the assessment results can be inconsistent.
To construct models that automatically distinguish between children with predominantly inattentive-type ADHD (ADHD-I), with combined-type ADHD (ADHD-C), and without ADHD.
Clinical records with age 6-17 years-old, for January 2011-September 2020 were collected from local general hospitals in northern Taiwan; the data were based on the SNAP-IV scale, the second and third editions of Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and various intelligence tests. This study used an artificial neural network to construct the models. In addition, -fold cross-validation was applied to ensure the consistency of the machine learning results.
We collected 328 records using CPT-3 and 239 records using CPT-2. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I and ADHD-C, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 88.75 and 85.56% in the training and testing sets, respectively. The replacement of CPT-2 with CPT-3 results in this model yielded an overall accuracy of 90.46% in the training set and 89.44% in the testing set. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and the absence of ADHD, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 86.74 and 77.43% in the training and testing sets, respectively.
This proposed model distinguished between the ADHD-I and ADHD-C groups with 85-90% accuracy, and it distinguished between the ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and control groups with 77-86% accuracy. The machine learning model helps clinicians identify patients with ADHD in a timely manner.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是儿童和青少年精神病学中一个经过充分研究的课题。ADHD的诊断依赖于教师和家长使用的评估量表信息以及医生的心理评估;然而,评估结果可能不一致。
构建能够自动区分以注意力不集中为主型ADHD(ADHD-I)、混合型ADHD(ADHD-C)和无ADHD儿童的模型。
收集了2011年1月至2020年9月台湾北部当地综合医院6至17岁儿童的临床记录;数据基于SNAP-IV量表、康纳斯连续性能测试(CPT)第二版和第三版以及各种智力测试。本研究使用人工神经网络构建模型。此外,采用十折交叉验证以确保机器学习结果的一致性。
我们使用CPT-3收集了328份记录,使用CPT-2收集了239份记录。在区分ADHD-I和ADHD-C方面,人口统计学信息、SNAP-IV量表结果和CPT-2结果的组合在训练集和测试集中的总体准确率分别为88.75%和85.56%。在该模型中用CPT-3结果替代CPT-2后,训练集的总体准确率为90.46%,测试集为89.44%。在区分ADHD-I、ADHD-C和无ADHD方面,人口统计学信息、SNAP-IV量表结果和CPT-2结果的组合在训练集和测试集中的总体准确率分别为86.74%和77.43%。
该模型区分ADHD-I和ADHD-C组的准确率为85%-90%,区分ADHD-I、ADHD-C和对照组的准确率为77%-86%。该机器学习模型有助于临床医生及时识别ADHD患者。