• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择架构改变了大学校园杂货店的水果和蔬菜购买行为:自然实验的时间序列建模。

Choice architecture modifies fruit and vegetable purchasing in a university campus grocery store: time series modelling of a natural experiment.

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Worcester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2HB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6063-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-6063-8
PMID:30285680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6167822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In developed countries, adolescent and young adult diets have been found to be nutritionally poor. The aim of this study was to examine whether a choice architecture intervention, re-arrangement of produce within a grocery store to increase the accessibility of fruit and vegetables, affected purchasing behaviour on a university campus.

METHODS

A database of daily sales data from January 2012 to July 2017 was obtained from a campus grocery store. Two changes to the layout were made during this time period. In January 2015, fruit and vegetables were moved from the back of the store, furthest from the entrance, to the aisle closest to the entrance and an entrance-facing display increasing their accessibility. In April 2016, the entrance-facing display of fruit and vegetables was replaced with a chiller cabinet so that fruit and vegetables remained more accessible than during the baseline period, but less accessible than in the period immediately previously. A retrospective interrupted time series analysis using dynamic regression was used to model the data and to examine the effect of the store re-arrangements on purchasing. All analyses were carried out both for sales-by-quantity and for sales-by-money.

RESULTS

The first shop re-arrangement which made fruit and vegetables more prominent, increased the percentage of total sales that were fruit and vegetables, when analysed by either items purchased or money spent. The second rearrangement also had a positive effect on the percentage of total sales that were fruit and vegetables compared to baseline, however this was not significant at the 5% level. Over the five year period, the percentage of sales that were fruit and vegetables declined both in terms of items purchased, and money spent.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing accessibility of fruit and vegetables in a grocery store is a feasible way to improve the diet of students in tertiary education. There is evidence of declining fruit and vegetable consumption among the studied population, which should be further investigated.

摘要

背景

在发达国家,青少年和年轻成年人的饮食被发现营养不足。本研究旨在检验一种选择架构干预措施(重新布置杂货店中的农产品以增加水果和蔬菜的可及性)是否会影响大学校园的购买行为。

方法

从校园杂货店的 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月的销售数据库中获得了每日销售数据。在此期间,对布局进行了两次更改。2015 年 1 月,水果和蔬菜从商店的后部(离入口最远的地方)移到了靠近入口的过道上,并设置了一个面向入口的展示架,以增加其可及性。2016 年 4 月,水果和蔬菜的入口展示柜被替换为冷藏柜,使得水果和蔬菜仍然比基线时期更易接近,但不如之前的时期那么容易接近。使用动态回归进行回顾性中断时间序列分析,对数据进行建模,并检验商店重新布置对购买行为的影响。所有分析均同时针对销售量和销售额进行。

结果

第一次重新布置使水果和蔬菜更加突出,按购买量或销售额计算,均增加了总销售额中水果和蔬菜的比例。第二次重新布置与基线相比,也对水果和蔬菜的总销售额比例产生了积极影响,但在 5%的水平上并不显著。在五年期间,无论是按购买量还是销售额计算,水果和蔬菜的销售额比例均有所下降。

结论

增加杂货店中水果和蔬菜的可及性是改善高等教育学生饮食的可行方法。在所研究的人群中,水果和蔬菜的消费呈下降趋势,这一点应该进一步调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee97/6167822/48c2bccfeda0/12889_2018_6063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee97/6167822/4cdef4c0d353/12889_2018_6063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee97/6167822/48c2bccfeda0/12889_2018_6063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee97/6167822/4cdef4c0d353/12889_2018_6063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee97/6167822/48c2bccfeda0/12889_2018_6063_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Choice architecture modifies fruit and vegetable purchasing in a university campus grocery store: time series modelling of a natural experiment.选择架构改变了大学校园杂货店的水果和蔬菜购买行为:自然实验的时间序列建模。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6063-8.
2
Altering product placement to create a healthier layout in supermarkets: Outcomes on store sales, customer purchasing, and diet in a prospective matched controlled cluster study.改变产品摆放位置以在超市营造更健康的布局:一项前瞻性匹配对照群组研究对商店销售、顾客购买和饮食的影响。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 7;18(9):e1003729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003729. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Choice architecture to promote fruit and vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): randomized corner store pilot study.通过参与妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)的家庭促进水果和蔬菜购买的选择架构:随机街角商店试点研究
Public Health Nutr. 2017 May;20(7):1297-1305. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003074. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Evaluation of three behavioural economics 'nudges' on grocery and convenience store sales of promoted nutritious foods.评价三种行为经济学“助推”策略对食品杂货和便利店促销营养食品销售的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3250-3260. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001794. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Effect of a price discount and consumer education strategy on food and beverage purchases in remote Indigenous Australia: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.偏远地区澳大利亚原住民的食品和饮料购买行为:价格折扣和消费者教育策略的影响:一项阶梯式随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e82-e95. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30043-3. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Can in-store interventions reduce the socioeconomic gap in fruit and vegetable purchases in grocery stores? A descriptive study of volume sales from 2012 to 2020 in Norway's largest grocery store chain.店内干预能否缩小杂货店中水果和蔬菜购买方面的社会经济差距?对挪威最大连锁杂货店 2012 年至 2020 年期间销售量的描述性研究。
Appetite. 2022 Sep 1;176:106100. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106100. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
7
Effect of a grocery store intervention on sales of nutritious foods to youth and their families.杂货店干预对向青少年及其家庭销售营养食品的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
8
Examining the Efficacy of a 'Feasible' Nudge Intervention to Increase the Purchase of Vegetables by First Year University Students (17-19 Years of Age) in British Columbia: A Pilot Study.检验“可行”的推动干预措施对增加不列颠哥伦比亚省 17-19 岁一年级大学生购买蔬菜的效果:一项试点研究。
Nutrients. 2019 Aug 2;11(8):1786. doi: 10.3390/nu11081786.
9
Food bundling as a health nudge: Investigating consumer fruit and vegetable selection using behavioral economics.食品捆绑作为一种健康推动策略:运用行为经济学研究消费者水果和蔬菜选择。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
The effect of nudges aligned with the renewed Flemish Food Triangle on the purchase of fresh fruits: An on-campus restaurant experiment.基于新弗拉芒食品三角的推动对购买新鲜水果的影响:校园餐厅实验。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104479. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104479. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing the food environment in secondary school canteens to promote healthy dietary choices: a qualitative study with school caterers.改变中学食堂的食物环境以促进健康饮食选择:一项与学校餐饮人员的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):1970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19513-7.
2
Improving student diet and food security in higher education using participatory and co-creation approaches: a systematic review.采用参与式和共同创造方法改善高等教育中学生的饮食和粮食安全:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 8;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01613-7.
3
"That's Pot Culture Right There": Purchasing Behaviors of People Who Use Cannabis Without a Medical Cannabis Card.

本文引用的文献

1
Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?政府应该在助推方面加大投资吗?
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1041-1055. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702501. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
Freshman 15 in England: a longitudinal evaluation of first year university student's weight change.英国的“大一新生15磅增重现象”:对大一学生体重变化的纵向评估
BMC Obes. 2016 Nov 3;3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40608-016-0125-1. eCollection 2016.
3
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
“那就是大麻文化”:无医用大麻卡的大麻使用者的购买行为
Cannabis. 2023 Jul 5;6(2):30-46. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023/000168. eCollection 2023.
4
In-Store Marketing and Supermarket Purchases: Associations Overall and by Transaction SNAP Status.店内营销与超市购物:总体关联度及交易 SNAP 状况。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.029. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
5
Factors That "Nudge People towards the Healthier" Snacks-A Qualitative Study with Student, Faculty, and Staff Leaders and Decision Makers.促使人们选择更健康零食的因素——一项针对学生、教师、员工领导人和决策者的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315922.
6
Type, density, and healthiness of food-outlets in a university foodscape: a geographical mapping and characterisation of food resources in a Ghanaian university campus.大学校园食物景观中的食物店铺类型、密度和健康度:加纳大学校园食物资源的地理绘图和特征描述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):1912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14266-7.
7
A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance.超市自动化电子销售数据在人群膳食监测中的系统评价
Nutr Rev. 2022 May 9;80(6):1711-1722. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab089.
8
Efficiency of In-Store Interventions to Impact Customers to Purchase Healthier Food and Beverage Products in Real-Life Grocery Stores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.店内干预措施对现实生活中杂货店顾客购买更健康食品和饮料产品的影响效率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Foods. 2021 Apr 22;10(5):922. doi: 10.3390/foods10050922.
9
Toward a Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Campus Food Environment: A Scoping Review of Postsecondary Food Interventions.迈向健康和环境可持续的校园食物环境:高等教育食物干预措施的范围综述。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;12(5):1996-2022. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab026.
10
The effect of on-shelf sugar labeling on beverage sales in the supermarket: a comparative interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment.货架上糖标签对超市饮料销售的影响:一项自然实验的比较中断时间序列分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Apr 6;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01114-x.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
4
Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice.引导消费者做出更健康的选择:对食物选择中位置影响的系统评价。
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2252-63. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001653.
5
Factors Influencing Changes in Eating Patterns Among Hong Kong Young Adults Transitioning to Tertiary Education.影响香港青年向高等教育过渡期间饮食模式变化的因素。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016 May;28(4):347-55. doi: 10.1177/1010539516641500. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
6
Eating Behaviours of British University Students: A Cluster Analysis on a Neglected Issue.英国大学生的饮食行为:对一个被忽视问题的聚类分析
Adv Prev Med. 2015;2015:639239. doi: 10.1155/2015/639239. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
7
Food Environment Interventions to Improve the Dietary Behavior of Young Adults in Tertiary Education Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.改善高等教育环境中年轻人饮食行为的食物环境干预措施:一项系统文献综述
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Oct;115(10):1647-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.380. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.水果和蔬菜摄入量与全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率的关系:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 29;349:g4490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4490.
9
Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality: analysis of Health Survey for England data.水果和蔬菜摄入量与全因死亡率、癌症死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率:基于英格兰健康调查数据的分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Sep;68(9):856-62. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203500. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
10
Determinants of eating behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions.大学生饮食行为的决定因素:一项采用焦点小组讨论的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 18;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-53.