Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research and Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 3;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1709-6.
To explore to what extent synovial hypertrophy in joints without Doppler activity is a sign of active disease, we investigated the sensitivity to change of synovial hypertrophy without Doppler activity during biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
RA patients initiating or switching bDMARD treatment had ultrasound (US) performed on 36 joints at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. Synovial hypertrophy by grayscale US and Doppler activity were graded separately from 0 to 3 at the joint level for all time points. Changes in synovial hypertrophy in joints without Doppler activity during treatment were assessed and compared with changes in synovial hypertrophy in joints with Doppler activity.
We included 151 patients (82.8% women, 80.1% seropositive for anticyclic citrullinated peptide) with a mean ± standard deviation age of 51.4 ± 13.2 years, a disease duration of 9.9 ± 7.9 years, and baseline Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive peptide (DAS28-CRP) of 4.14 ± 1.32. At baseline, 44.8% of all joints examined (n = 5225) had synovial hypertrophy ≥ 1 and 50.7% of these had synovial hypertrophy without Doppler activity. The improvement in synovial hypertrophy was similar in joints with and without Doppler activity but, when adjusting for the baseline score of synovial hypertrophy, joints with synovial hypertrophy without Doppler had a higher tendency towards a decrease than joints with synovial hypertrophy with Doppler activity independent of grade (3 months: p < 0.0001; 6 months: p = 0.0003).
Joints with synovial hypertrophy without Doppler activity improve during treatment, independent of the grade. Thus, SH without Doppler activity is not a sign of inactive disease. These findings indicate that joints with synovial hypertrophy without Doppler activity should also be taken in to account when assessing disease activity by US.
为了探究关节内无多普勒活动的滑膜肥厚在多大程度上是疾病活动的标志,我们研究了在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者接受生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗期间,无多普勒活动的滑膜肥厚的变化对治疗的敏感性。
新开始或转换 bDMARD 治疗的 RA 患者在基线时和治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月进行 36 个关节的超声(US)检查。在所有时间点,关节水平的滑膜肥厚程度通过灰阶 US 分级,多普勒活动分级分别为 0 至 3 级。评估治疗期间无多普勒活动的关节中滑膜肥厚的变化,并与有多普勒活动的关节中滑膜肥厚的变化进行比较。
我们纳入了 151 例(82.8%为女性,80.1%抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性)患者,平均年龄为 51.4±13.2 岁,平均病程为 9.9±7.9 年,基线时 28 关节疾病活动度评分-红细胞沉降率(DAS28-ESR)为 4.14±1.32。基线时,检查的所有关节中有 44.8%(n=5225)有滑膜肥厚≥1 级,其中 50.7%有滑膜肥厚且无多普勒活动。有和无多普勒活动的关节中滑膜肥厚的改善相似,但在调整基线滑膜肥厚评分后,无多普勒活动的关节较有多普勒活动的关节有更高的倾向于减少,而与分级无关(3 个月:p<0.0001;6 个月:p=0.0003)。
有滑膜肥厚且无多普勒活动的关节在治疗过程中会改善,而与分级无关。因此,无多普勒活动的滑膜肥厚并不是疾病不活动的标志。这些发现表明,在使用 US 评估疾病活动时,也应考虑有滑膜肥厚且无多普勒活动的关节。