International Clinical Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
John Snow, Inc, Lusaka, Zambia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3415-z.
BACKGROUND: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for prevention of HIV acquisition, but requires HIV testing at regular intervals. Female sex workers (FSWs) are a priority population for HIV prevention interventions in many settings, but face barriers to accessing healthcare. Here, we assessed the acceptability of HIV self-testing for regular HIV testing during PrEP implementation among FSWs participating in a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing delivery models. METHODS: We used data from two HIV self-testing randomized controlled trials with identical protocols in Zambia and in Uganda. From September-October 2016, participants were randomized in groups to: (1) direct delivery of an HIV self-test, (2) delivery of a coupon, exchangeable for an HIV self-test at nearby health clinics, or (3) standard HIV testing services. Participants completed assessments at baseline and 4 weeks. Participants reporting their last HIV test was negative were asked about their interest in various PrEP modalities and their HIV testing preferences. We used mixed effects logistic regression models to measure differences in outcomes across randomization arms at four weeks. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, 633 participants in Zambia and 749 participants in Uganda reported testing negative at their last HIV test. The majority of participants in both studies were "very interested" in daily oral PrEP (91% Zambia; 66% Uganda) and preferred HIV self-testing to standard testing services while on PrEP (87% Zambia; 82% Uganda). Participants in the HIV self-testing intervention arms more often reported preference for HIV self-testing compared to standard testing services to support PrEP in both Zambia (P = 0.002) and Uganda (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PrEP implementation programs for FSW could consider inclusion of HIV self-testing to reduce the clinic-based HIV testing burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02827240 and NCT02846402 .
背景:艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)对于预防艾滋病毒感染非常有效,但需要定期进行艾滋病毒检测。在许多情况下,性工作者(FSW)是艾滋病毒预防干预的重点人群,但她们在获得医疗保健方面面临障碍。在这里,我们评估了艾滋病毒自我检测在性工作者中实施 PrEP 期间定期进行艾滋病毒检测的可接受性,这些性工作者参加了艾滋病毒自我检测提供模式的随机对照试验。
方法:我们使用了来自赞比亚和乌干达两项艾滋病毒自我检测随机对照试验的数据,这些试验采用了相同的方案。2016 年 9 月至 10 月,参与者按组随机分配:(1)直接提供艾滋病毒自我检测,(2)提供优惠券,可在附近的诊所兑换艾滋病毒自我检测,或(3)标准艾滋病毒检测服务。参与者在基线和 4 周时完成评估。报告上次艾滋病毒检测结果为阴性的参与者被问及他们对各种 PrEP 模式的兴趣以及他们对艾滋病毒检测的偏好。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归模型来衡量在四周时随机分组之间结果的差异。
结果:在 4 周时,赞比亚的 633 名参与者和乌干达的 749 名参与者报告了他们最近的艾滋病毒检测结果为阴性。这两项研究中的大多数参与者都对每日口服 PrEP 非常感兴趣(91%的赞比亚;66%的乌干达),并且更喜欢艾滋病毒自我检测而不是标准检测服务来支持 PrEP(87%的赞比亚;82%的乌干达)。在这两项研究中,艾滋病毒自我检测干预组的参与者更倾向于选择艾滋病毒自我检测而不是标准检测服务来支持 PrEP,在赞比亚(P=0.002)和乌干达(P<0.001)中都是如此。
结论:性工作者的 PrEP 实施计划可以考虑纳入艾滋病毒自我检测,以减少基于诊所的艾滋病毒检测负担。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02827240 和 NCT02846402。
BMC Public Health. 2023-6-16
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024-11-15
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018-9-1
Contraception. 2017-9
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017-7