文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

与医护人员检测相比,自我检测用 HIV 快速诊断检测的可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Reliability of HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing compared with testing by health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of HIV, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of HIV, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet HIV. 2018 Jun;5(6):e277-e290. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30044-4. Epub 2018 Apr 24.


DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30044-4
PMID:29703707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5986793/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability of individuals to use HIV self-tests correctly is debated. To inform the 2016 WHO recommendation on HIV self-testing, we assessed the reliability and performance of HIV rapid diagnostic tests when used by self-testers. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, PopLine, and Embase, conference abstracts, and additional grey literature between Jan 1, 1995, and April 30, 2016, for observational and experimental studies reporting on HIV self-testing performance. We excluded studies evaluating home specimen collection because patients did not interpret their own test results. We extracted data independently, using standardised extraction forms. Outcomes of interest were agreement between self-testers and health-care workers, sensitivity, and specificity. We calculated κ to establish the level of agreement and pooled κ estimates using a random-effects model, by approach (directly assisted or unassisted) and type of specimen (blood or oral fluid). We examined heterogeneity with the I statistic. FINDINGS: 25 studies met inclusion criteria (22 to 5662 participants). Quality assessment with QUADAS-2 showed studies had low risk of bias and incomplete reporting in accordance with the STARD checklist. Raw proportion of agreement ranged from 85·4% to 100%, and reported κ ranged from fair (κ 0·277, p<0·001) to almost perfect (κ 0·99, n=25). Pooled κ suggested almost perfect agreement for both types of approaches (directly assisted 0·98, 95% CI 0·96-0·99 and unassisted 0·97, 0·96-0·98; I=34·5%, 0-97·8). Excluding two outliers, sensitivity and specificity was higher for blood-based rapid diagnostic tests (4/16) compared with oral fluid rapid diagnostic tests (13/16). The most common error that affected test performance was incorrect specimen collection (oral swab or finger prick). Study limitations included the use of different reference standards and no disaggregation of results by individuals taking antiretrovirals. INTERPRETATION: Self-testers can reliably and accurately do HIV rapid diagnostic tests, as compared with trained health-care workers. Errors in performance might be reduced through the improvement of rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing, particularly to make sample collection easier and to simplify instructions for use. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Unitaid.

摘要

背景:个体正确使用 HIV 自检试剂的能力存在争议。为了为 2016 年世卫组织关于 HIV 自检的建议提供信息,我们评估了自检者使用 HIV 快速诊断检测时的可靠性和性能。

方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 4 月 30 日期间发表的关于 HIV 自检性能的观察性和实验性研究的 PubMed、PopLine 和 Embase、会议摘要和其他灰色文献。我们排除了评估家庭标本采集的研究,因为患者无法解释自己的检测结果。我们使用标准化的提取表格独立提取数据。主要结局指标为自检者与卫生保健工作者之间的一致性、敏感性和特异性。我们使用随机效应模型,通过方法(直接辅助或非辅助)和标本类型(血液或口腔液)计算 κ 值以确定一致性水平,并对 κ 估计值进行汇总。我们用 I 统计量来检查异质性。

结果:25 项研究符合纳入标准(22 项至 5662 名参与者)。使用 QUADAS-2 进行质量评估表明,这些研究的偏倚风险较低,且根据 STARD 清单报告不完整。原始一致性比例范围为 85.4%至 100%,报告的 κ 值范围为差(κ=0.277,P<0.001)至近乎完美(κ=0.99,n=25)。汇总 κ 值表明两种方法均具有近乎完美的一致性(直接辅助法为 0.98,95%CI 0.96-0.99,非辅助法为 0.97,0.96-0.98;I=34.5%,0-97.8)。排除两个异常值后,基于血液的快速诊断检测的敏感性和特异性(4/16)高于基于口腔液的快速诊断检测(13/16)。影响检测性能的最常见错误是标本采集不正确(口腔拭子或指尖采血)。研究的局限性包括使用不同的参考标准,以及没有按个体服用抗逆转录病毒药物的情况对结果进行分类。

解释:与经过培训的卫生保健工作者相比,自检者可以可靠且准确地进行 HIV 快速诊断检测。通过改进用于自检的快速诊断检测,特别是使样本采集更容易,并简化使用说明,可能会降低检测性能的错误。

资助:比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会和联合国艾滋病规划署。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f579/5986793/641a5bffd3a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f579/5986793/073339cbf4b9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f579/5986793/641a5bffd3a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f579/5986793/073339cbf4b9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f579/5986793/641a5bffd3a2/gr2.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Reliability of HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing compared with testing by health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lancet HIV. 2018-4-24

[2]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[3]
Point-of-care viral load tests to detect high HIV viral load in people living with HIV/AIDS attending health facilities.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-10

[4]
Point-of-care tests detecting HIV nucleic acids for diagnosis of HIV-1 or HIV-2 infection in infants and children aged 18 months or less.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-12

[5]
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-3-24

[6]
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-9-15

[7]
Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards.

PLoS One. 2009-11-13

[8]
Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assays for active tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-8-27

[9]
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22

[10]

2021-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Predicting HIV self-testing intentions among Chinese college students: a dual-model analysis integrating health belief constructs and machine learning prioritization.

Front Public Health. 2025-7-31

[2]
Analytical and Clinical Validation of the ConfiSign HIV Self-Test for Blood-Based HIV Screening.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-7-21

[3]
Acceptability of self-sampling and self-testing for infections: a rapid systematic review on public users' views.

BMC Public Health. 2025-2-20

[4]
Accuracy of the Self-Administered Rapid HIV Urine Test in a Real-World Setting and Individual Preferences for HIV Self-Testing - Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China, July 2020-February 2021.

China CDC Wkly. 2025-1-10

[5]
Evaluating the effectiveness of oral HIV self testing according to distribution models in Cameroon.

Sci Rep. 2024-12-28

[6]
Expanding HIV Self-Test Kits via Community Pharmacies in Rwanda Has Improved Availability, but Affordability Remains an Issue.

Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2024-12-20

[7]
Efficacy of the mLab App: a randomized clinical trial for increasing HIV testing uptake using mobile technology.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025-2-1

[8]
Leveraging HIV self-testing to achieve the UNAIDS 2025 targets in the South and Southeast Asia region.

J Int AIDS Soc. 2024-10

[9]
Usability and acceptability of self-testing for hepatitis C virus exposure in a high-prevalence urban informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan.

BMC Infect Dis. 2024-9-27

[10]
Index-Linked Assisted HIV Self-Testing for Children 2-14 Years: Results of a Pilot Evaluation in Ethiopia.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025-1-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Evaluation of the practicability and virological performance of finger-stick whole-blood HIV self-testing in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

PLoS One. 2018-1-10

[2]
Acceptability and Usability Evaluation of Finger-Stick Whole Blood HIV Self-Test as An HIV Screening Tool Adapted to The General Public in The Central African Republic.

Open AIDS J. 2017-11-21

[3]
Prospective observational study to evaluate the performance of the BioSure HIV Self-Test in the hands of lay users.

Sex Transm Infect. 2017-9-18

[4]
Feasibility of supervised self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid testing method: a cross-sectional, mixed method study among pregnant women in rural India.

J Int AIDS Soc. 2016-9-12

[5]
Supervised oral HIV self-testing is accurate in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Trop Med Int Health. 2016-6

[6]
A Finger-Stick Whole-Blood HIV Self-Test as an HIV Screening Tool Adapted to the General Public.

PLoS One. 2016-2-16

[7]
[Analysis on accuracy and influencing factors of oral fluid-based rapid HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men].

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2016-1

[8]
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.

BMJ. 2015-10-28

[9]
Accuracy and Acceptability of Oral Fluid HIV Self-Testing in a General Adult Population in Kenya.

AIDS Behav. 2016-4

[10]
Uptake, Accuracy, Safety, and Linkage into Care over Two Years of Promoting Annual Self-Testing for HIV in Blantyre, Malawi: A Community-Based Prospective Study.

PLoS Med. 2015-9-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索