Center for Medical Sciences and Technologies, Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;27(2):203-210. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0276-2. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Each year millions of newborns are part of a newborn disease-screening program in which, after initial screening, the newborn dried blood spot (NDBS) samples can be stored and used as a population-based research resource. However, very little knowledge exists about how these samples are used for secondary purposes. Our objective is to estimate and describe the usage of a NDBS-based national population biobank for secondary research purposes. We therefore conducted a scoping study with a literature search for all published articles using samples from the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank. Our main inclusion criteria were that the articles had to have actively used and analyzed one or more of the Danish NDBS samples for a purpose beyond the primary screening. Our search led to a final 104 articles, which were coded for three main purposes: (1) how many samples were used in each article, (2) the field of their research, and (3) information on consent and ethics approval as research. From our analysis, we present two main findings: an estimated use of up to 37.5% of all samples in the newborn screening biobank have been part of published research, and a shift in the research areas from methodological and metabolic studies to studies concerning mental illness. This paper provides new insights into the use of a national biobank, and we hope that the results will contribute to the discussions on the use of biological samples for research purposes, and also inspire a greater transparency in the future use of NDBS samples.
每年都有数百万名新生儿参与新生儿疾病筛查计划,在初步筛查后,新生儿干血斑(NDBS)样本可以被储存起来,作为基于人群的研究资源使用。然而,人们对于这些样本如何被用于次要目的的了解甚少。我们的目的是评估和描述如何将基于 NDBS 的全国人口生物样本库用于次要研究目的。因此,我们进行了一项范围界定研究,对使用丹麦新生儿筛查生物样本库样本的所有已发表文章进行了文献检索。我们的主要纳入标准是,这些文章必须积极使用并分析了一个或多个丹麦 NDBS 样本,以实现超出初步筛查的目的。我们的搜索最终确定了 104 篇文章,这些文章被编码为三个主要目的:(1)每篇文章使用了多少样本;(2)研究领域;(3)关于同意和伦理批准作为研究的信息。从我们的分析中,我们得出了两个主要发现:估计新生儿筛查生物样本库中多达 37.5%的样本已被用于已发表的研究,而且研究领域从方法学和代谢研究转向精神疾病研究。本文提供了对国家生物样本库使用情况的新见解,我们希望研究结果将有助于讨论生物样本用于研究目的的问题,并在未来使用 NDBS 样本时提高透明度。