• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊科使用场边脑震荡测试。

Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department.

作者信息

Kruse Adam J, Nugent Andrew S, Peterson Andrew R

机构信息

Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 26;10:113-121. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S165995. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S165995
PMID:30288131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6163013/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Many patients with TBI are initially treated in the emergency department (ED), but there is no evidence-based method of detecting or grading TBI in patients who have normal structural neuroimaging. This study aims to evaluate the validity of two common sideline concussion tests. The Concussion Symptom Severity Score (CSSS) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) tests are well-validated sideline tests for concussion, but have not been validated in the setting of non-sport-related concussion, in settings other than the sideline or athletic training room or in moderate or severe TBI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-eight subjects who had sustained a TBI within the previous 72 hours and 53 healthy control subjects were enrolled. CSSS and mBESS were administered. Clinical outcomes were followed up prospectively.

RESULTS

The CSSS was collected in 147 TBI subjects but only 51 TBI subjects were able to complete the mBESS. The CSSS was collected for all 53 control subjects, and the mBESS was completed for 51 control subjects. The mean CSSS for TBI and control subjects was 32.25 and 2.70, respectively ( < 0.001). The average mBESS for TBI and control subjects was 7.43 and 7.20, respectively ( = 0.82). CSSS greater than 5.17 was 93.43% sensitive and 69.84% specific for TBI.

CONCLUSION

The mBESS is poorly tolerated and, among those who can complete the test, not sensitive to TBI in the ED. The CSSS is both sensitive to TBI and well tolerated.

摘要

目的

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是美国死亡和残疾的重要原因。许多TBI患者最初在急诊科(ED)接受治疗,但对于结构神经影像学正常的患者,尚无基于证据的TBI检测或分级方法。本研究旨在评估两种常见的场边脑震荡测试的有效性。脑震荡症状严重程度评分(CSSS)和改良平衡误差评分系统(mBESS)测试是经过充分验证的场边脑震荡测试,但尚未在非运动相关脑震荡的情况下、场边或运动训练室以外的环境中或中度或重度TBI中得到验证。

患者与方法

纳入148名在过去72小时内发生TBI的受试者和53名健康对照受试者。进行CSSS和mBESS测试。对临床结果进行前瞻性随访。

结果

147名TBI受试者收集了CSSS,但只有51名TBI受试者能够完成mBESS。所有53名对照受试者均收集了CSSS,51名对照受试者完成了mBESS。TBI和对照受试者的平均CSSS分别为32.25和2.70(<0.001)。TBI和对照受试者的平均mBESS分别为7.43和7.20(=0.82)。CSSS大于5.17对TBI的敏感性为93.43%,特异性为69.84%。

结论

mBESS耐受性差,在能够完成测试的患者中,对急诊科的TBI不敏感。CSSS对TBI既敏感又耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/86bc19c08860/oaem-10-113Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/3acf7098c7fe/oaem-10-113Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/23c1cbf08d8a/oaem-10-113Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/41214f7bef62/oaem-10-113Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/2be8f78ceafc/oaem-10-113Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/3b0eb23cc9ed/oaem-10-113Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/86bc19c08860/oaem-10-113Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/3acf7098c7fe/oaem-10-113Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/23c1cbf08d8a/oaem-10-113Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/41214f7bef62/oaem-10-113Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/2be8f78ceafc/oaem-10-113Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/3b0eb23cc9ed/oaem-10-113Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dbb/6163013/86bc19c08860/oaem-10-113Fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department.在急诊科使用场边脑震荡测试。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 26;10:113-121. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S165995. eCollection 2018.
2
The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: a systematic review.运动性脑震荡评估工具:一项系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15611.
3
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.美国运动医学学会立场声明:运动性脑震荡。
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941.
4
Is the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition a useful concussion assessment tool in head-injured patients presenting to the emergency department?对于前往急诊科就诊的头部受伤患者,《运动性脑震荡评估工具第5版》是一种有用的脑震荡评估工具吗?
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Jun;35(3):474-482. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14144. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
5
Do Sideline Concussion Assessments Predict Subsequent Neurocognitive Impairment After Sport-Related Concussion?场边脑震荡评估能否预测运动相关脑震荡后的后续神经认知障碍?
J Athl Train. 2017 Jul;52(7):676-681. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.4.01. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Use of the sport concussion assessment tools in the emergency department to predict persistent post-concussive symptoms in children.在急诊科使用运动性脑震荡评估工具预测儿童持续性脑震荡后症状。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Aug;56(8):1249-1256. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14910. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Test-retest reliability of the Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) in US military personnel.前庭眼动筛查(VOMS)工具和改良平衡错误评分系统(mBESS)在美军人员中的重测信度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Mar;24(3):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
False-Positive Rates and Associated Risk Factors on the Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening and Modified Balance Error Scoring System in US Military Personnel.美军前庭眼动筛查和改良平衡错误评分系统的假阳性率及相关危险因素。
J Athl Train. 2022 May 1;57(5):458-463. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0094.21.
9
The diagnostic and prognostic utility of the dual-task tandem gait test for pediatric concussion.双重任务串联步态测试在儿科 concussion 中的诊断和预后效用。
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Mar;10(2):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Modified Balance Error Scoring System in Concussed Collegiate Student Athletes.改良版平衡误差评分系统在脑震荡大学生运动员中的敏感性和特异性
Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Mar;28(2):174-176. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000426.

引用本文的文献

1
Sports-Related Concussion Is a Personalized Issue-Evaluation of Medical Assessment and Subjective Feeling of the Athlete in a German Level 1 Trauma Center.与运动相关的脑震荡是一个个性化问题——德国一级创伤中心对运动员医学评估及主观感受的评估
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 28;12(10):1596. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101596.
2
Concussion in Non-athletes: Assessment of Cognition and Symptomatology (CONTACTS) study protocol - an exploratory cohort study investigating the utility of sports concussion assessment tools and salivary microRNAs to diagnose concussion in NHS patients.非运动员脑震荡:认知和症状评估(CONTACTS)研究方案 - 一项探索性队列研究,旨在调查运动性脑震荡评估工具和唾液 microRNAs 在 NHS 患者脑震荡诊断中的效用。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e062030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062030.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of acute head injury in an emergency department population using sport concussion assessment tool - 3rd edition.使用运动性脑震荡评估工具第3版对急诊科人群的急性头部损伤进行评估。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(2):110-119. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1248765. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Classification of traumatic brain injury: past, present, and future.创伤性脑损伤的分类:过去、现在与未来。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:15-21. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00002-7.
3
Assessing postural stability in the concussed athlete: what to do, what to expect, and when.
Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): test-retest reliability in a community adult sample.脑损伤筛查工具(BIST):社区成年样本中的重测信度。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 3;12(8):e057701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057701.
评估脑震荡运动员的姿势稳定性:该做什么,预期什么,以及何时进行。
Sports Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):427-33. doi: 10.1177/1941738114541238.
4
Reliability and validity evidence of multiple balance assessments in athletes with a concussion.脑震荡运动员多种平衡评估的可靠性和有效性证据
J Athl Train. 2014 Jul-Aug;49(4):540-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.32. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
Utilization of a text-messaging robot to assess intraday variation in concussion symptom severity scores.利用短信机器人评估脑震荡症状严重程度评分的日内变化。
Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Mar;25(2):149-52. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000115.
6
Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review.运动相关性脑震荡的评估、管理和认知:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2014 Apr;44(4):449-71. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0134-x.
7
Comparison of the balance accelerometer measure and balance error scoring system in adolescent concussions in sports.运动性青少年脑震荡的平衡加速计测量与平衡误差评分系统比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1404-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546513484446. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
8
Normative data for the balance error scoring system in adults.成人平衡误差评分系统的标准数据。
Rehabil Res Pract. 2013;2013:846418. doi: 10.1155/2013/846418. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
9
Evidence-based approach to revising the SCAT2: introducing the SCAT3.基于循证医学的方法修订 SCAT2:引入 SCAT3。
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;47(5):289-93. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092225.
10
Consensus statement on concussion in sport--the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012.关于运动性脑震荡的共识声明——2012年11月于苏黎世召开的第四届运动性脑震荡国际会议
Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Mar;23(2):89-117. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31828b67cf.