McDowell Michelle, Rebitschek Felix G, Gigerenzer Gerd, Wegwarth Odette
Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany (MM, FGR, GG, OW).
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Aug 23;1(1):2381468316665365. doi: 10.1177/2381468316665365. eCollection 2016 Jul-Dec.
One of the major hurdles to promoting informed decision making in health is the continued use of poor risk presentation formats. This article offers a guide to develop a Fact Box, a simple decision tool to present data about the benefits and harms of treatments that has been demonstrated to improve understanding of health risks, an important part of risk literacy. The article offers guidance about how to determine the evidence basis for a health topic, select outcomes to report, extract and present numbers or outcomes, and design the layout. The guide also addresses potential challenges for summarizing evidence and provides alternatives for addressing issues related to missing, insufficient, imprecise, or conflicting evidence and for dealing with issues related to statistical and clinical significance. The guide concludes with details on how to document the development of the Fact Box for the purpose of transparency and reproducibility. Fact Boxes are an efficient tool to promote risk literacy and should be available in every physician's office.
在健康领域促进明智决策的主要障碍之一是持续使用糟糕的风险呈现形式。本文提供了一份关于开发“事实框”的指南,“事实框”是一种简单的决策工具,用于呈现治疗的益处和危害的数据,已证明它能提高对健康风险的理解,而这是风险素养的重要组成部分。本文就如何确定健康主题的证据基础、选择要报告的结果、提取并呈现数据或结果以及设计布局提供了指导。该指南还探讨了总结证据时可能面临的挑战,并针对与缺失、不足、不精确或相互矛盾的证据相关的问题以及处理与统计和临床意义相关的问题提供了替代方法。该指南最后详细说明了如何记录“事实框”的开发过程,以确保透明度和可重复性。“事实框”是提高风险素养的有效工具,每个医生办公室都应配备。