Howell Benjamin L, Deb Partha, Ma Sai, Reid Rachel O, Levy Jesse, Riley Gerald F, Conway Patrick H, Shrank William H
CVS Health, Cumberland, Rhode Island (BLH, WHS).
Department of Economics, CUNY Hunter College, New York (PD).
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 May 5;2(1):2381468317707206. doi: 10.1177/2381468317707206. eCollection 2017 Jan-Jun.
There are considerable quality differences across private Medicare Advantage insurance plans, so it is important that beneficiaries make informed choices. During open enrollment for the 2013 coverage year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services sent letters to beneficiaries enrolled in low-quality Medicare Advantage plans (i.e., plans rated less than 3 stars for at least 3 consecutive years by Medicare) explaining the stars and encouraging them to reexamine their choices. To understand the effectiveness of these low-cost, behavioral "nudge" letters, we used a beneficiary-level national retrospective cohort and performed multivariate regression analysis of plan selection during the 2013 open enrollment period among those enrolled in plans rated less than 3 stars. Our analysis controls for beneficiary demographic characteristics, health and health care spending risks, the availability of alternative higher rated plan options in their local market, and historical disenrollment rates from the plans. We compared the behaviors of those beneficiaries who received the nudge letters with those who enrolled in similar poorly rated plans but did not receive such letters. We found that beneficiaries who received the nudge letter were almost twice as likely (28.0% [95% confidence interval = 27.7%, 28.2%] vs. 15.3% [95% confidence interval = 15.1%, 15.5%]) to switch to a higher rated plan compared with those who did not receive the letter. White beneficiaries, healthier beneficiaries, and those residing in areas with more high-performing plan choices were more likely to switch plans in response to the nudge. Our findings highlight both the importance and efficacy of providing timely and actionable information to beneficiaries about quality in the insurance marketplace to facilitate informed and value-based coverage decisions.
私人医疗保险优势保险计划之间存在显著的质量差异,因此受益人做出明智的选择非常重要。在2013年承保年度的公开报名期间,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心向参加低质量医疗保险优势计划的受益人(即那些被医疗保险连续至少3年评为低于3星的计划)发送信件,解释星级情况并鼓励他们重新审视自己的选择。为了了解这些低成本的行为“助推”信件的效果,我们使用了一个受益人的全国回顾性队列,并对2013年公开报名期间参加评级低于3星计划的人员的计划选择进行了多变量回归分析。我们的分析控制了受益人的人口统计学特征、健康和医疗支出风险、当地市场中更高评级替代计划选项的可用性以及这些计划的历史退保率。我们将收到助推信件的受益人的行为与那些参加类似低评级计划但未收到此类信件的受益人的行为进行了比较。我们发现,与未收到信件的受益人相比,收到助推信件的受益人转向更高评级计划的可能性几乎是其两倍(28.0% [95%置信区间 = 27.7%,28.2%] 对 15.3% [95%置信区间 = 15.1%,15.5%])。白人受益人、健康状况较好的受益人以及居住在有更多高绩效计划选择地区的受益人更有可能因助推而更换计划。我们的研究结果凸显了向受益人提供有关保险市场质量的及时且可操作信息以促进明智和基于价值的承保决策的重要性和有效性。