Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。

Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

How often enrollees with complex care needs leave the Medicare Advantage (MA) program and what might drive their decisions remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize trends in switching to and from MA among high-need beneficiaries and to evaluate the drivers of disenrollment decisions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of MA and traditional Medicare (TM) enrollees from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015, used a multinomial logit regression stratified by Medicare-Medicaid eligibility status. All 14 589 645 non-high-need MA enrollees and 1 302 470 high-need enrollees in the United States who survived until the end of 2014 were eligible for the analysis. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2017, through August 1, 2018.

EXPOSURES

Enrollee dual eligibility and high-need status (based on complex chronic conditions, multiple morbidities, use of health care services, functional impairment, and frailty indicators), MA plan star rating, and cost sharing.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The proportion of enrollees who disenrolled into TM, remained in the same MA plan, or who switched plans within the MA program.

RESULTS

A total of 13 901 816 enrollees were included in the analysis (56.2% women; mean [SD] age, 70.9 [9.9] years). Among the 1 302 470 high-need enrollees, an adjusted 4.6% (95% CI, 4.5%-4.6%) of Medicare-only and 14.8% (95% CI, 14.5%-15.0%) of Medicare-Medicaid members switched from MA to TM compared with 3.3% (95% CI, 3.3%-3.3%) and 4.6% (95% CI, 4.5%-4.7%), respectively, among non-high-need enrollees. Among enrollees in low-quality plans, 23.0% (95% CI, 22.3%-23.9%) of Medicare and 42.8% (95% CI, 40.5%-45.1%) of dual-eligible high-need enrollees left MA. Even in high-quality plans, high-need members disenrolled at higher rates than non-high-need members (4.9% [95% CI, 4.6%-5.2%] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 1.8%-1.9%] for Medicare-only enrollees and 11.3% vs 2.4% dual eligible enrollees). Enrollment in a 5.0-star rated plan was associated with a 30.1-percentage point reduction (95% CI, -31.7 to -28.4 percentage points) in the probability of disenrollment among high-need individuals. A $100 increase in monthly premiums was associated with a 33.9-percentage point increase (95% CI, -34.9 to -33.0 percentage points) in the likelihood of switching plans, and a small reduction in the likelihood of disenrolling (-2.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.2 to -2.2 percentage points). Among Medicare-Medicaid eligible participants, 14.1% (95% CI, 14.0%-14.2%) of high-need and 16.7% (95% CI, 16.6%-16.7%) of non-high-need enrollees switched from TM to MA.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study suggest that substantially higher disenrollment from MA plans occurs among high-need and Medicare-Medicaid eligible enrollees. This study's findings suggest that star ratings have the strongest association with disenrollment trends, whereas increases in monthly premiums are associated with greater likelihood of switching plans.

摘要

重要性

Medicare Advantage(MA)计划中具有复杂护理需求的参保者离开该计划的频率以及可能导致他们做出决定的因素尚不清楚。

目的

描述高需求受益人的 MA 计划转换和退出趋势,并评估退出决定的驱动因素。

设计、设置和参与者: 本研究为 MA 和传统 Medicare(TM)参保者的横断面研究,数据来源于 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,采用多分类逻辑回归,根据医疗保险-医疗补助资格状态进行分层。所有在美国有资格参与分析的非高需求 MA 参保者 14589645 人和高需求参保者 1302470 人都存活到 2014 年底。数据分析于 2017 年 11 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 1 日进行。

暴露情况

参保者的双重资格和高需求状况(基于复杂的慢性疾病、多种合并症、医疗保健服务使用、功能障碍和脆弱性指标)、MA 计划星级评分和自付费用。

主要结果和措施

退出 TM 计划、留在同一 MA 计划或在 MA 计划内转换计划的参保者比例。

结果

共有 13901816 名参保者纳入分析(56.2%为女性;平均[SD]年龄为 70.9[9.9]岁)。在 1302470 名高需求参保者中,与非高需求参保者相比,医疗保险独户和医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格成员中分别有 4.6%(95% CI,4.5%-4.6%)和 14.8%(95% CI,14.5%-15.0%)从 MA 转为 TM,而分别有 3.3%(95% CI,3.3%-3.3%)和 4.6%(95% CI,4.5%-4.7%)的非高需求参保者留在同一 MA 计划中或转换到其他 MA 计划。在低质量计划中,医疗保险独户和医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格高需求成员的退保率分别为 23.0%(95% CI,22.3%-23.9%)和 42.8%(95% CI,40.5%-45.1%)。即使在高质量计划中,高需求参保者的退保率也高于非高需求参保者(医疗保险独户为 4.9%[95% CI,4.6%-5.2%] vs 1.8%[95% CI,1.8%-1.9%],医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格为 11.3%vs 2.4%)。入评 5 星的计划与高需求人群退保率降低 30.1 个百分点(95% CI,-31.7 至-28.4 个百分点)相关。每月保费增加 100 美元,计划转换的可能性增加 33.9 个百分点(95% CI,-34.9 至-33.0 个百分点),退保的可能性降低 2.7 个百分点(95% CI,-3.2 至-2.2 个百分点)。在医疗保险-医疗补助资格参保者中,高需求人群中有 14.1%(95% CI,14.0%-14.2%)和非高需求人群中有 16.7%(95% CI,16.6%-16.7%)从 TM 转为 MA。

结论和相关性

本研究结果表明,高需求和医疗保险-医疗补助资格参保者从 MA 计划中退保的比例明显较高。本研究结果表明,星级评分与退保趋势的相关性最强,而每月保费的增加与计划转换的可能性更大相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Understanding the Effect of Race on Medicare Advantage Enrollment.了解种族对医疗保险优势参保情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14464. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14464. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验