Kistler Christine E, Golin Carol, Sundaram Anupama, Morris Carolyn, Dalton Alexandra F, Ferrari Renee, Lewis Carmen L
Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Medicine, and Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 May 2;3(1):2381468318765172. doi: 10.1177/2381468318765172. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
Discussions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with older adults should be individualized to maximize appropriate screening. Our aim was to describe CRC screening discussions and explore their associations with patient characteristics and screening intentions. Cross-sectional survey of 422 primary care patients aged ≥70 years and eligible for CRC screening, including open-ended questions about CRC screening discussions. Primary outcomes were the frequency with which CRC screening discussions occurred, who had those discussions, and the domains that emerged from thematic analysis of participants' brief reports of their discussions. We also examined the associations between 1) patient characteristics and whether a screening discussion occurred and 2) the domains discussed and what screening decisions were made. Of 422 participants, 209 reported having discussions and 201 responded to open-ended questions about CRC discussions. In a regression analysis, several factors were associated with increased odds of having a discussion: participants' preference to pursue screening (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3, 3.9), good health (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7, 4.8), and receipt of the decision aid (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4, 3.2). Our thematic analysis identified five domains related to discussion content and three related to discussion process. The CRC screening-related information domain was the most commonly discussed content domain, and the timing/frequency domain was associated with increased odds of intent to pursue screening. Decision-making role, the most commonly discussed process domain, was associated with increased odds of the intent to forgo CRC screening. CRC screening discussions varied by type of participant and content. Future work is needed to determine if interventions focused on specific domains alters the appropriateness of participants' colorectal cancer screening intentions.
与老年人进行结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的讨论应因人而异,以最大限度地实现适当筛查。我们的目的是描述CRC筛查讨论情况,并探讨其与患者特征及筛查意愿的关联。对422名年龄≥70岁且符合CRC筛查条件的初级保健患者进行横断面调查,包括关于CRC筛查讨论的开放式问题。主要结果包括CRC筛查讨论发生的频率、进行这些讨论的人员以及对参与者讨论简要报告进行主题分析得出的领域。我们还研究了1)患者特征与是否进行筛查讨论之间的关联,以及2)讨论的领域与所做出的筛查决策之间的关联。在422名参与者中,209人报告进行了讨论,201人回答了关于CRC讨论的开放式问题。在回归分析中,有几个因素与进行讨论的几率增加相关:参与者进行筛查的偏好(比值比[OR] 2.3,95%置信区间[CI] 1.3,3.9)、健康状况良好(OR 2.9,95% CI 1.7,4.8)以及接受决策辅助工具(OR 2.1,95% CI 1.4,3.2)。我们的主题分析确定了与讨论内容相关的五个领域和与讨论过程相关的三个领域。与CRC筛查相关的信息领域是最常讨论的内容领域,时间/频率领域与进行筛查意愿的几率增加相关。决策角色是最常讨论的过程领域,与放弃CRC筛查意愿的几率增加相关。CRC筛查讨论因参与者类型和内容而异。需要开展进一步研究以确定针对特定领域的干预措施是否会改变参与者结直肠癌筛查意愿的适当性。