• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力健康不平等概念模型(HHI 模型):批判性综合分析。

Conceptual Model of Hearing Health Inequalities (HHI Model): A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute for Health Policy and Organisation (IHPO), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Institute for Health Policy and Organisation (IHPO), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211002963. doi: 10.1177/23312165211002963.

DOI:10.1177/23312165211002963
PMID:34049470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165532/
Abstract

Hearing loss is a major health challenge that can have severe physical, social, cognitive, economic, and emotional consequences on people's quality of life. Currently, the modifiable factors linked to socioeconomic inequalities in hearing health are poorly understood. Therefore, an online database search (PubMed, Scopus, and Psych) was conducted to identify literature that relates hearing loss to health inequalities as a determinant or health outcome. A total of 53 studies were selected to thematically summarize the existing literature, using a critical interpretive synthesis method, where the subjectivity of the researcher is intimately involved in providing new insights with explanatory power. The evidence provided by the literature can be summarized under four key themes: (a) There might be a vicious cycle between hearing loss and socioeconomic inequalities and lifestyle factors, (b) socioeconomic position may interact with less healthy lifestyles, which are harmful to hearing ability, (c) increasing health literacy could improve the diagnosis and prognosis of hearing loss and prevent the adverse consequences of hearing loss on people's health, and (d) people with hearing loss might be vulnerable to receiving low-quality and less safe health care. This study uses elements from theoretical models of health inequalities to formulate a highly interpretive conceptual model for examining hearing health inequalities. This model depicts the specific mechanisms of hearing health and their evolution over time. There are many modifiable determinants of hearing loss, in several stages across an individual's life span; tackling socioeconomic inequalities throughout the life-course could improve the population's health, maximizing the opportunity for healthy aging.

摘要

听力损失是一个重大的健康挑战,会对人们的生活质量造成严重的身体、社会、认知、经济和情感后果。目前,与听力健康的社会经济不平等相关的可改变因素还了解甚少。因此,我们进行了在线数据库检索(PubMed、Scopus 和 Psych),以确定将听力损失与健康不平等作为决定因素或健康结果相关的文献。共选择了 53 项研究,采用批判性解释性综合方法对现有文献进行主题总结,该方法密切涉及研究人员的主观性,以便提供具有解释力的新见解。文献提供的证据可以总结为四个关键主题:(a) 听力损失和社会经济不平等以及生活方式因素之间可能存在恶性循环;(b) 社会经济地位可能与更不健康的生活方式相互作用,这些生活方式对听力能力有害;(c) 提高健康素养可以改善听力损失的诊断和预后,并防止听力损失对人们健康的不利后果;(d) 听力损失者可能容易接受低质量和不安全的医疗保健。本研究使用健康不平等理论模型的要素来制定一个高度解释性的概念模型,以检查听力健康不平等。该模型描述了听力健康及其随时间演变的具体机制。听力损失有许多可改变的决定因素,在个体的整个生命周期中处于不同阶段;在整个生命周期中解决社会经济不平等问题可以改善人口健康,最大限度地实现健康老龄化的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/f4c89bc9a9d6/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/ae78cb9c9678/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/b6c242de2471/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/2495bc5c5d46/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/f4c89bc9a9d6/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/ae78cb9c9678/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/b6c242de2471/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/2495bc5c5d46/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a1/8165532/f4c89bc9a9d6/10.1177_23312165211002963-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Conceptual Model of Hearing Health Inequalities (HHI Model): A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.听力健康不平等概念模型(HHI 模型):批判性综合分析。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211002963. doi: 10.1177/23312165211002963.
2
The current state of complex systems research on socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behavior-a systematic scoping review.当前社会经济不平等对健康和健康行为的复杂系统研究现状——系统范围综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Feb 5;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01562-1.
3
Preventive dental visiting: a critical interpretive synthesis of theory explaining how inequalities arise.预防性牙科就诊:关于不平等现象如何产生的理论的批判性解释性综合分析
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;45(2):120-134. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12268. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
4
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with hearing loss in older adults: a cross-sectional study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).与老年人听力损失相关的社会经济和生活方式因素:英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e031030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031030.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
[Socioeconomic inequalities in health among the elderly population in Spain].[西班牙老年人口健康方面的社会经济不平等现象]
Gac Sanit. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):276-288. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Lifestyle and Income-related Inequality in Health in South Africa.南非生活方式和收入相关的健康不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 19;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0598-7.
8
Inequalities in cognitive impairment among older adults in China and the associated social determinants: a decomposition approach.中国老年人认知障碍的不平等及其相关社会决定因素:分解方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 19;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01422-5.
9
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing hearing health inequalities using routine health information systems.利用常规健康信息系统评估听力健康不平等状况。
J Public Health Policy. 2025 Sep;46(3):630-644. doi: 10.1057/s41271-025-00584-8. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
Consideration of health inequity in systematic reviews and primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss.在关于听力损失风险因素的系统评价和原始研究中对健康不平等的考量。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 3;2(4):e12052. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12052. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Hearing Impairment Among Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Rural Eastern Cape: A Retrospective Analysis of Audiometric Findings.

本文引用的文献

1
Regional patterns and trends of hearing loss in England: evidence from the English longitudinal study of ageing (ELSA) and implications for health policy.英格兰听力损失的地区模式和趋势:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的证据及其对健康政策的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 15;20(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01945-6.
2
Comparison of Self-reported Measures of Hearing With an Objective Audiometric Measure in Adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.《在英国老龄化纵向研究中,成人自报听力测量与客观测听测量的比较》
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15009.
3
The Effects of Age-Related Hearing Loss on the Brain and Cognitive Function.
东开普省农村地区耐多药结核病患者的听力损害:听力测定结果的回顾性分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 21;22(5):810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050810.
4
Performance of Hearing Test Software Applications to Detect Hearing Loss.听力测试软件应用检测听力损失的性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2166.
5
A scoping review on the nature of parental involvement among Pacific and minority populations with hearing loss.关于太平洋地区和少数族裔听力损失人群中父母参与情况本质的范围综述。
J R Soc N Z. 2024 Sep 24;55(3):721-753. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2399359. eCollection 2025.
6
Association between hearing loss, depression, anxiety, and social isolation in middle-aged and older outpatients in Afghanistan.阿富汗中老年门诊患者听力损失、抑郁、焦虑与社会隔离之间的关联
Qatar Med J. 2024 Oct 15;2024(4):57. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.57. eCollection 2024.
7
Noise-induced hearing loss: a 10-year analysis of notifications according to the Brazilian Classification of Occupations.噪声性听力损失:根据巴西职业分类对通报情况进行的10年分析
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Sep 24;22(2):e20231163. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1163. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
Cultural competence in NHS hearing aid clinics: a mixed-methods case study of services for Deaf British sign language users in the UK.NHS 助听器诊所的文化能力:英国为聋人英国手语使用者提供服务的混合方法案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):1440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10339-4.
9
New horizons in hearing conditions.听力状况的新视野。
Age Ageing. 2023 Aug 1;52(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad150.
10
What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol.当成年人因听力损失而被开处助听器时,哪些因素对哪些人在什么情况下很重要?一项现实主义综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 15;12(7):e059836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836.
年龄相关性听力损失对大脑和认知功能的影响。
Trends Neurosci. 2020 Oct;43(10):810-821. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Investigating similarities and differences in health needs according to disability type using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》研究残疾类型不同的健康需求的异同。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Dec;43(26):3723-3732. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1773941. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Access to health care for people with disabilities in rural Malawi: what are the barriers?马拉维农村地区残疾人获得医疗保健服务的障碍有哪些?
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08691-9.
6
The development of an mHealth educational intervention for first-time hearing aid users: combining theoretical and ecologically valid approaches.为首次使用助听器的用户开发移动医疗教育干预措施:结合理论和生态有效方法。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Jul;59(7):492-500. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1755063. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Individual-level and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in hearing impairment among Chinese adults: a population-based study.中国成年人听力障碍的个体和地区社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(6):541-547. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213437. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
9
Biopsychosocial Classification of Hearing Health Seeking in Adults Aged Over 50 Years in England.英格兰 50 岁以上成年人听力健康寻求的生物心理社会分类。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1215-1225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000839.
10
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with hearing loss in older adults: a cross-sectional study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).与老年人听力损失相关的社会经济和生活方式因素:英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e031030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031030.