• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影像学耳蜗面神经裂的发生率。

Prevalence of Radiographic Cochlear-Facial Nerve Dehiscence.

机构信息

Division of Otology & Neurotology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):1319-1325. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002015.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002015
PMID:30289844
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of radiographic cochlear-facial nerve dehiscence (CFD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiological study.

SETTING

Two tertiary-referral centers.

PATIENTS

Two hundred six temporal-bone computed tomography (CT) scans (405 total ears) of otology/neurotology patients from two academic institutions between the years 2014 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cochlear-facial nerve partition width (CFPW) was measured on coronal CT sections and defined as the shortest distance between the cochlear basal turn and facial nerve (FN) labyrinthine segment. We used logistics regression analyses to determine positive predictors for radiographic evidence of CFD.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of radiographic CFD was 5.4% (22/406 ears). 9.2% of patients (19/206) had CFD. Of these 19 patients, only one patient had mixed hearing loss that could not be explained by any other vestibular or auditory etiology. Three out of 206 patients had dehiscence in both ears (1.4%). The average CFPW was 0.6 ± 0.2 mm, and fallopian canal width was 1.1 ± 0.02 mm (n = 405). Older age, use of traditional CT scans, and thinner CT slice thickness were significant predictors for radiographic CFD.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiographic prevalence of CFD is higher than what is reported in histologic studies, and may over-estimate the true prevalence of CFD. The clinician should keep this in mind when considering this as potential cause for third-window symptoms.

摘要

目的

确定影像学耳蜗面神经裂(CFD)的患病率。

研究设计

回顾性影像学研究。

设置

两个三级转诊中心。

患者

来自两个学术机构的 2014 年至 2017 年间的 206 例耳科学/神经耳科学患者的 206 个颞骨计算机断层扫描(CT)(405 只耳朵)。

干预措施

诊断。

主要观察指标

在冠状 CT 切片上测量耳蜗面神经分隔宽度(CFPW),定义为耳蜗基底转与面神经(FN)迷路段之间的最短距离。我们使用逻辑回归分析来确定影像学 CFD 证据的阳性预测因素。

结果

影像学 CFD 的总体患病率为 5.4%(22/406 只耳朵)。9.2%的患者(19/206)有 CFD。在这 19 名患者中,只有 1 名患者有混合性听力损失,无法用任何其他前庭或听觉病因解释。206 名患者中有 3 名双耳裂(1.4%)。平均 CFPW 为 0.6±0.2mm,骨迷路宽度为 1.1±0.02mm(n=405)。年龄较大、使用传统 CT 扫描和较薄的 CT 切片厚度是影像学 CFD 的显著预测因素。

结论

CFD 的影像学患病率高于组织学研究报告的患病率,可能高估了 CFD 的真实患病率。当考虑将其作为第三窗口症状的潜在原因时,临床医生应牢记这一点。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Radiographic Cochlear-Facial Nerve Dehiscence.影像学耳蜗面神经裂的发生率。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):1319-1325. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002015.
2
Prevalence of occult cochlear basal turn patency.耳蜗底回隐窝通畅的患病率。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov;140(11):889-892. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1800815. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Cochlear-facial dehiscence - the most common cause of facial nerve stimulation from a cochlear implant? A case-control study.耳蜗-面神经裂 - 耳蜗植入对面神经刺激的最常见原因?一项病例对照研究。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2024 Mar;25(2):154-164. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2024.2316452. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial Dehiscence in a Study of 1,020 Temporal Bone Specimens.在一项对1020个颞骨标本的研究中蜗面神经裂的患病率
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):967-72. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001057.
5
Variations in the labyrinthine segment of facial nerve canal revealed by high-resolution computed tomography.高分辨率计算机断层扫描显示面神经管迷路段的变异。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Apr;45(2):261-264. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
The Rates and Clinical Characteristics of Pneumolabyrinth in Temporal Bone Fracture.颞骨骨折中气迷路的发生率及临床特征
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):1048-53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000662.
7
Prevalence of labyrinthine ossification in CT and MR imaging of patients with acute deafness to severe sensorineural hearing loss.CT 和 MR 成像患者急性聋至重度感音神经性听力损失的迷路骨化患病率。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):495-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.786191. Epub 2013 May 29.
8
Can Preoperative CT Scans Be Used to Predict Facial Nerve Stimulation Following CI?术前CT扫描能否用于预测人工耳蜗植入后的面神经刺激?
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Sep;38(8):1112-1117. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001497.
9
Congenital aplasia of the semicircular canals.先天性半规管发育不全
Otol Neurotol. 2003 May;24(3):437-46. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200305000-00014.
10
Pediatric Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: Radiographic and Histologic Prevalence, With Clinical Correlation.小儿半规管裂:影像学和组织学患病率及其与临床的相关性
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(8):1383-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000811.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial Nerve Dehiscence and Facial Nerve Stimulation for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.成人人工耳蜗植入受者的蜗面神经裂缺及面神经刺激发生率
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 18;10(3):e70181. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70181. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Characteristics of the Facial Canal-Lateral Canal Dehiscence: The Under-recognized Third Window.面神经管-外侧半规管裂的特征:未被充分认识的第三窗
OTO Open. 2025 Feb 17;9(1):e70085. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70085. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
3
A CT Radiologic Assessment of the Incidence of Cochlear-Facial Dehiscence and the Thickness of Bone between the Cochlea and Facial Nerve among Normal Temporal Bones.
正常颞骨中蜗面神经裂孔发生率及耳蜗与面神经之间骨厚度的CT影像学评估
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Feb 19;86(1):23-26. doi: 10.1055/a-2253-8865. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Investigation of Third Window Symptoms in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Pilot Study.大前庭导水管患者第三窗症状的研究:一项初步研究
OTO Open. 2025 Jan 7;9(1):e70071. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70071. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
5
A case of cochlear-facial dehiscence revealed after bilateral cochlear implants.双侧人工耳蜗植入术后发现一例蜗面神经裂。
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Dec 29;19(3):1110-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.11.083. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial and Other Non-Superior Semicircular Canal Third Window Dehiscence on High-Resolution Temporal Bone CT.高分辨率颞骨 CT 检查中耳蜗-面神经和其他非优势半规管第三窗窗裂的患病率。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1309-1313. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8032. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Multi-mode grounding and monophasic passive discharge stimulation avoid aberrant facial nerve stimulation following cochlear implantation.多模式接地和单相被动放电刺激可避免人工耳蜗植入后异常的面神经刺激。
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Feb 2;10(2):e05360. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5360. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Severe and persistent facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation in a patient with cochlear-facial dehiscence: a case report.患者存在耳蜗-面神经裂,行人工耳蜗植入后出现严重且持续的面神经刺激:病例报告。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Nov;49(11):3000605211057823. doi: 10.1177/03000605211057823.
9
Third Window Syndrome: Surgical Management of Cochlea-Facial Nerve Dehiscence.第三窗综合征:耳蜗-面神经裂缺的外科治疗
Front Neurol. 2019 Dec 13;10:1281. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01281. eCollection 2019.
10
Cochlear-facial dehiscence in a pediatric patient.小儿患者的耳蜗-面神经裂。
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 May;50(5):750-752. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04600-4. Epub 2020 Jan 8.