• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于脓毒症相关性 ARDS 炎症亚表型的 6 个月和 12 个月患者结局:SAILS-ALTOS 试验的二次分析。

Six-month and 12-month patient outcomes based on inflammatory subphenotypes in sepsis-associated ARDS: secondary analysis of SAILS-ALTOS trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.

Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Thorax. 2022 Jan;77(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216613. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216613
PMID:34112703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8660939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) trials have identified hypoinflammatory and hyperinflammatory subphenotypes, with distinct differences in short-term outcomes. It is unknown if such differences extend beyond 90 days or are associated with physical, mental health or cognitive outcomes.

METHODS

568 patients in the multicentre Statins for Acutely Injured Lungs from Sepsis trial of rosuvastatin versus placebo were included and assigned a subphenotype. Among 6-month and 12-month survivors (N=232 and 219, respectively, representing 243 unique survivors), subphenotype status was evaluated for association with a range of patient-reported outcomes (eg, mental health symptoms, quality of life). Patient subsets also were evaluated with performance-based tests of physical function (eg, 6 min walk test) and cognition.

FINDINGS

The hyperinflammatory versus hypoinflammatory subphenotype had lower overall 12-month cumulative survival (58% vs 72%, p<0.01); however, there was no significant difference in survival beyond 90 days (86% vs 89%, p=0.70). Most survivors had impairment across the range of outcomes, with little difference between subphenotypes at 6-month and 12-month assessments. For instance, at 6 months, in comparing the hypoinflammatory versus hyperinflammatory subphenotypes, respectively, the median (IQR) patient-reported SF-36 mental health domain score was 47 (33-56) vs 44 (35-56) (p=0.99), and the per cent predicted 6 min walk distance was 66% (48%, 80%) vs 66% (49%, 79%) (p=0.76).

INTERPRETATION

Comparing the hyperinflammatory versus hypoinflammatory ARDS subphenotype, there was no significant difference in survival beyond 90 days and no consistent findings of important differences in 6-month or 12-month physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes. These findings, when considered with prior results, suggest that inflammatory subphenotypes largely reflect the acute phase of illness and its short-term impact.

摘要

背景

先前的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)试验已经确定了低炎症和高炎症亚表型,其短期结局存在明显差异。目前尚不清楚这些差异是否会持续超过 90 天,或者是否与身体、心理健康或认知结局相关。

方法

纳入了多中心分离他汀治疗脓毒症急性肺损伤试验中瑞舒伐他汀与安慰剂的 568 例患者,并对其进行了亚表型分类。在 6 个月和 12 个月的幸存者(分别为 232 例和 219 例,代表 243 例独特的幸存者)中,评估了亚表型状态与一系列患者报告结局(例如,心理健康症状、生活质量)之间的关系。还对患者亚组进行了身体功能(如 6 分钟步行试验)和认知方面的基于表现的测试。

结果

高炎症亚表型与低炎症亚表型相比,12 个月总累积生存率较低(分别为 58%和 72%,p<0.01);然而,90 天后的生存率没有显著差异(分别为 86%和 89%,p=0.70)。大多数幸存者在一系列结局中均存在障碍,亚表型之间的差异在 6 个月和 12 个月评估中不大。例如,在 6 个月时,与低炎症亚表型相比,高炎症亚表型的患者报告 SF-36 心理健康量表的中位数(IQR)分别为 47(33-56)和 44(35-56)(p=0.99),6 分钟步行距离预测百分比分别为 66%(48%,80%)和 66%(49%,79%)(p=0.76)。

解释

与高炎症和低炎症 ARDS 亚表型相比,90 天后的生存率无显著差异,6 个月或 12 个月的身体、认知和心理健康结局也没有一致的重要差异发现。这些发现与先前的结果相结合表明,炎症亚表型主要反映了疾病的急性期及其短期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/8660939/6b0c21642595/nihms-1752248-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/8660939/45fee6eb69f3/nihms-1752248-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/8660939/6b0c21642595/nihms-1752248-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/8660939/45fee6eb69f3/nihms-1752248-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/8660939/6b0c21642595/nihms-1752248-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Six-month and 12-month patient outcomes based on inflammatory subphenotypes in sepsis-associated ARDS: secondary analysis of SAILS-ALTOS trial.基于脓毒症相关性 ARDS 炎症亚表型的 6 个月和 12 个月患者结局:SAILS-ALTOS 试验的二次分析。
Thorax. 2022 Jan;77(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216613. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
One-year outcomes of rosuvastatin versus placebo in sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: prospective follow-up of SAILS randomised trial.瑞舒伐他汀对比安慰剂治疗脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的一年结局:SAILS随机试验的前瞻性随访
Thorax. 2016 May;71(5):401-10. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208017. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Latent class analysis of ARDS subphenotypes: a secondary analysis of the statins for acutely injured lungs from sepsis (SAILS) study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚表型的潜在类别分析:脓毒症中他汀类药物治疗急性肺损伤(SAILS)研究的二次分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5378-3. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚表型与辛伐他汀反应的差异:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):691-698. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Temporal stability of inflammatory subphenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome: 28-day insights from the ICAR trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征炎症亚表型的时间稳定性:来自ICAR试验的28天见解
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2025 May 26;44(5):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101559.
6
Inflammatory subphenotypes previously identified in ARDS are associated with mortality at intensive care unit discharge: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.先前在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中确定的炎症亚表型与重症监护病房出院时的死亡率相关:一项前瞻性观察研究的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2024 May 7;28(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04929-9.
7
Effect of total cholesterol and statin therapy on mortality in ARDS patients: a secondary analysis of the SAILS and HARP-2 trials.总胆固醇和他汀类药物治疗对 ARDS 患者死亡率的影响:SAILS 和 HARP-2 试验的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 28;27(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04387-9.
8
9
Validation and utility of ARDS subphenotypes identified by machine-learning models using clinical data: an observational, multicohort, retrospective analysis.基于机器学习模型的临床数据对 ARDS 亚表型的验证和实用性:一项观察性、多队列、回顾性分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Apr;10(4):367-377. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00461-6. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Subphenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with high-flow oxygen.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者接受高流量氧治疗的亚表型。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 1;27(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04687-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical management of sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: current evidence and future directions.脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床管理:当前证据与未来方向
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 26;12:1531275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1531275. eCollection 2025.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Sepsis Survivors Following Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.危重症成年脓毒症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1238. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
3
Disproportionate Use of the ED by Patients 3 Years After e-Cigarette or Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotypes and personalized medicine in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的表型和个体化医学。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2136-2152. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06296-9. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Delirium.谵妄。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Nov 12;6(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00223-4.
3
ARDS Subphenotypes: Understanding a Heterogeneous Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)亚表型:理解一种异质性综合征。
电子烟或雾化产品使用相关肺损伤3年后患者对急诊科的过度使用
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):339-342. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.023. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Illness Weakness, Polyneuropathy and Myopathy: Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcomes.疾病虚弱、多发性神经病和肌病:诊断、治疗和长期预后。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 13;27(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04676-3.
5
Early transthoracic echocardiography and long-term mortality in moderate- to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: An analysis of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database.中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者早期经胸超声心动图与长期死亡率:对重症监护医疗信息集市数据库的分析。
Sci Prog. 2023 Oct-Dec;106(4):368504231201229. doi: 10.1177/00368504231201229.
6
Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的临床脓毒症表型
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 27;11(9):2165. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092165.
7
Role of aspirin, beta-blocker, statins, and heparin therapy in septic patients under mechanical ventilation: a narrative review.阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物和肝素治疗在机械通气脓毒症患者中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 10;10:1143090. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1143090. eCollection 2023.
8
Identifying Comorbid Subtypes of Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.识别急性呼吸衰竭患者的共病亚型。
Am J Crit Care. 2023 Jul 1;32(4):294-301. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2023980.
9
ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies.急性呼吸窘迫综合征 ESICM 指南:定义、表型和呼吸支持策略。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
10
Cardiovascular Subphenotypes in ARDS: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications and Overlap with Other ARDS Subphenotypes.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的心血管亚表型:诊断和治疗意义以及与其他急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚表型的重叠
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3695. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113695.
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2778-x.
4
Phenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: moving towards precision medicine.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的表型:迈向精准医学。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Feb;25(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000571.
5
Latent class analysis of ARDS subphenotypes: a secondary analysis of the statins for acutely injured lungs from sepsis (SAILS) study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚表型的潜在类别分析:脓毒症中他汀类药物治疗急性肺损伤(SAILS)研究的二次分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5378-3. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚表型与辛伐他汀反应的差异:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):691-698. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Negative trials in critical care: why most research is probably wrong.重症监护领域的阴性试验:为何大多数研究可能是错误的。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):659-660. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30279-0. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
8
Predicting Long-term Cognitive Dysfunction in Survivors of Critical Illness with Plasma Inflammatory Markers: a Retrospective Cohort Study.预测危重症幸存者的长期认知功能障碍:一项回顾性队列研究。
Mol Neurobiol. 2019 Jan;56(1):763-767. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1166-x. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Relationships between markers of neurologic and endothelial injury during critical illness and long-term cognitive impairment and disability.危重病期间神经和内皮损伤标志物与长期认知障碍和残疾的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):345-355. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5120-1. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Stability of ARDS subphenotypes over time in two randomised controlled trials.在两项随机对照试验中,ARDS 亚表型随时间的稳定性。
Thorax. 2018 May;73(5):439-445. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211090. Epub 2018 Feb 24.