Dai Zhanzhan, Lou Xiaozhen, Shen Tuo, Sun Yu, Xiao Yongqiang, Zheng Xingfeng, Wang Xuexin, Peng Yu, Guo Yukun, Guo Yibin, Wen Jiannan, Fang He, Ma Bing, Xia Zhaofan
Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University; Burn Institute of PLA; 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China.
Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China.
Burns Trauma. 2021 Jul 28;9:tkab016. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab016. eCollection 2021.
Hypertrophic scars are one of the main complications that affect the quality of life of patients after burns. Many methods have been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, such as ablative fractional CO laser (AFCL) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, there are few studies on the effect of the combined application of these measures. The purpose of this study was to explore the therapeutic effect of AFCL combined with PRP on hypertrophic burn scars.
A retrospective clinical observation study was conducted on 50 patients with hypertrophic burn scars. The AFCL+PRP group included 31 patients who received AFCL combined with PRP treatment; the AFCL group included 19 patients who received AFCL treatment only. The University of North Carolina 4P Scar Scale (UNC4P) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores that were collected before each treatment were used as indicators of the effectiveness of the previous treatment. The scores recorded at the second, fourth and seventh months were analysed.
The demographic data of the 2 groups were not significantly different. Before treatment, there was no difference in the UNC4P and VSS scores between the 2 groups. There was a significant decline in the UNC4P and VSS total scores over 6 months in both groups ( < 0.05) and scores in the 2 groups were comparable after 3 and 6 months ( < 0.05). UNC4P scores in the AFCL+PRP group decreased from a mean of 8.26 to 2.61 ( < 0.05) with a concomitant drop in VSS scores from a mean of 11.74 to 6.06 ( < 0.01). In the AFCL group UNC4P and VSS scores decreased from 7.68 to 4.63 ( < 0.05) and from 10.89 to 8.16 ( < 0.05), respectively. The sub-items of these 2 assessments were analysed and the results suggest that AFCL combined with PRP can comprehensively improve scarring.
This study shows that PRP is an effective adjunct for AFCL in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars and that the combination of PRP and AFCL proved to be more useful than AFCL alone. This combination may be a new and effective clinical practice for the treatment of scars. However, larger and higher-level clinical studies are still needed to determine its efficacy and possible mechanisms.
肥厚性瘢痕是影响烧伤患者生活质量的主要并发症之一。许多方法已被证明对治疗肥厚性瘢痕有效,如剥脱性分数CO2激光(AFCL)和富血小板血浆(PRP)。然而,关于这些措施联合应用效果的研究较少。本研究的目的是探讨AFCL联合PRP治疗烧伤后肥厚性瘢痕的疗效。
对50例烧伤后肥厚性瘢痕患者进行回顾性临床观察研究。AFCL+PRP组包括31例接受AFCL联合PRP治疗的患者;AFCL组包括19例仅接受AFCL治疗的患者。每次治疗前收集的北卡罗来纳大学4P瘢痕量表(UNC4P)和温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分用作先前治疗效果的指标。分析在第2、4和7个月记录的评分。
两组的人口统计学数据无显著差异。治疗前,两组的UNC4P和VSS评分无差异。两组在6个月内UNC4P和VSS总分均显著下降(P<0.05),3个月和6个月后两组评分相当(P<0.05)。AFCL+PRP组UNC4P评分从平均8.26降至2.61(P<0.05),同时VSS评分从平均11.74降至6.06(P<0.01)。AFCL组UNC4P和VSS评分分别从7.68降至4.63(P<0.05)和从10.89降至8.16(P<0.05)。对这两项评估的子项目进行分析,结果表明AFCL联合PRP可全面改善瘢痕形成。
本研究表明,PRP是AFCL治疗烧伤后肥厚性瘢痕的有效辅助手段,PRP与AFCL联合使用比单独使用AFCL更有效。这种联合可能是一种新的有效的瘢痕治疗临床方法。然而,仍需要更大规模和更高水平的临床研究来确定其疗效和可能的机制。