Bernard Rose, Bowsher G, Milner C, Boyle P, Patel P, Sullivan R
1Conflict and Health Research Group, King's College London, London, UK.
King's Centre for Global Health, Suite 2.13 Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ UK.
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2018;26(5):509-514. doi: 10.1007/s10389-018-0899-3. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) from the clandestine intelligence sector are being increasingly employed in infectious disease outbreaks. The purpose of this article is to explore how such tools might be employed in the detection, reporting, and control of outbreaks designated as a 'threat' by the global community. It is also intended to analyse previous use of such tools during the Ebola and SARS epidemics and to discuss key questions regarding the ethics and legality of initiatives that further blur the military and humanitarian spaces.
We undertake qualitative analysis of current discussions on OSINT and SIGINT and their intersection with global health. We also review current literature and describe the debates. We built on quantitative and qualitative research done into current health collection capabilities.
This article presents an argument for the use of OSINT in the detection of infectious disease outbreaks and how this might occur.
We conclude that there is a place for OSINT and SIGINT in the detection and reporting of outbreaks. However, such tools are not sufficient on their own and must be corroborated for the intelligence to be relevant and actionable. Finally, we conclude that further discussion on key ethical issues needs to take place before such research can continue. In particular, this involves questions of jurisdiction, data ownership, and ethical considerations.
来自秘密情报部门的开源情报(OSINT)和信号情报(SIGINT)在传染病暴发中得到越来越多的应用。本文旨在探讨如何将此类工具用于检测、报告和控制被国际社会认定为“威胁”的疫情暴发。本文还旨在分析此类工具在埃博拉疫情和非典疫情期间的既往使用情况,并讨论有关进一步模糊军事与人道主义领域界限的举措在伦理和法律方面的关键问题。
我们对当前关于开源情报和信号情报及其与全球卫生交叉领域的讨论进行定性分析。我们还查阅了当前文献并描述了相关辩论情况。我们以对当前卫生情报收集能力的定量和定性研究为基础。
本文提出了使用开源情报检测传染病暴发的理由以及这一过程可能如何实现。
我们得出结论,开源情报和信号情报在疫情暴发的检测和报告方面有其用武之地。然而,此类工具本身并不足够,情报必须得到确证才具有相关性和可操作性。最后,我们得出结论,在这类研究能够继续开展之前,需要就关键伦理问题进行进一步讨论。特别是,这涉及管辖权、数据所有权和伦理考量等问题。