Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov;48(10):1044-1060. doi: 10.1111/apt.15001. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic functional bowel disorder. Disturbances in the gastrointestinal microbiome may be involved in its aetiology. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in IBS. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to July 2017). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with IBS, comparing prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics or antibiotics with placebo or no therapy were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were pooled using a standardised mean difference with a 95% CI. RESULTS: The search identified 4017 citations. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics were sparse. Fifty-three RCTs of probiotics, involving 5545 patients, were eligible. Particular combinations of probiotics, or specific species and strains, appeared to have beneficial effects on global IBS symptoms and abdominal pain, but it was not possible to draw definitive conclusions about their efficacy. There were five trials of similar design that used rifaximin in non-constipated IBS patients, which was more effective than placebo (RR of symptoms persisting = 0.84; 95% CI 0.79-0.90). Adverse events were no more common with probiotics or antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Which particular combination, species or strains of probiotics are effective for IBS remains, for the most part, unclear. Rifaximin has modest efficacy in improving symptoms in non-constipated IBS.
背景:肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种慢性功能性肠病。胃肠道微生物组的紊乱可能与它的发病机制有关。
目的:进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查益生元、益生菌、合生菌和抗生素在 IBS 中的疗效。
方法:检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处(截至 2017 年 7 月)。符合条件的是招募 IBS 成年患者的随机对照试验(RCT),比较益生元、益生菌、合生菌或抗生素与安慰剂或无治疗的疗效。二项症状数据汇总以获得治疗后仍有症状的相对风险(RR),置信区间(CI)为 95%。使用标准化均数差值和 95%CI 汇总连续数据。
结果:搜索确定了 4017 个引文。益生元和合生菌的数据很少。符合条件的是 53 项益生菌 RCT,涉及 5545 名患者。特定的益生菌组合,或特定的种类和菌株,似乎对全球 IBS 症状和腹痛有有益的影响,但尚无法对其疗效得出明确结论。有五个类似设计的试验使用利福昔明治疗非便秘型 IBS 患者,其疗效优于安慰剂(RR 为症状持续存在=0.84;95%CI 为 0.79-0.90)。益生菌或抗生素的不良反应并不更常见。
结论:对于 IBS,哪种特定的益生菌组合、种类或菌株有效,在很大程度上仍不清楚。利福昔明在改善非便秘型 IBS 症状方面具有一定疗效。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-2
Complement Ther Med. 2019-1-16
Cells. 2025-7-25
Transl Med UniSa. 2023-12-22