• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特退化景观土壤质量的影响。

Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in degraded karst landscapes of southwest China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, Hunan, China; Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, Hunan, China; Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2657-2665. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.372. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.372
PMID:30296773
Abstract

Vegetation restoration was implemented to control soil erosion in the karst regions of southwest China. It is essential to assess the soil function and quality scientifically during this process and to adopt suitable management practices for this area. However, few studies have been conducted to comprehensively evaluate the effect of vegetation restoration on soil quality in this severely eroded karst area. By taking 302 soil samples from 11 vegetation types, this study investigated the influence of different types of vegetation restoration on soil quality using an integrated soil quality index (SQI) and a generalized linear model (GLM). Vegetation types had significant effects on soil properties and thus on soil quality. SQI was developed by using TN, TP, TK, AP, and clay content; TN had highest weighting values (0.58), which indicated that it contributed the most to final SQI. The highest and lowest SQI values were observed for primary forest and cropland, respectively. Overall, vegetation restoration (e.g., natural restoration, artificial forests and artificial grassland) improved soil quality significantly. A GLM model explained 73.20% of the total variation in SQI, and vegetation type explained the largest proportion (46.39%) of the variation, which implies that the vegetation restoration practices can greatly enhance the soil quality in karst landscapes of southwest China. The results of this study may be used to improve implication of ecological restoration and management in degraded regions.

摘要

植被恢复被实施于中国西南喀斯特地区以控制水土流失。在此过程中,科学评估土壤功能和质量并采取适合该地区的管理措施至关重要。然而,很少有研究全面评估植被恢复对这一严重侵蚀喀斯特地区土壤质量的影响。本研究通过对 11 种植被类型的 302 个土壤样本进行调查,采用综合土壤质量指数(SQI)和广义线性模型(GLM)研究了不同类型的植被恢复对土壤质量的影响。植被类型对土壤性质,进而对土壤质量有显著影响。SQI 通过 TN、TP、TK、AP 和粘粒含量来构建;TN 的权重值最高(0.58),表明其对最终 SQI 的贡献最大。原始森林和耕地的 SQI 值最高和最低。总体而言,植被恢复(如自然恢复、人工林和人工草地)显著提高了土壤质量。GLM 模型解释了 SQI 总变异的 73.20%,植被类型解释了最大比例(46.39%)的变异,这意味着植被恢复实践可以极大地提高中国西南喀斯特景观的土壤质量。本研究的结果可用于改进退化地区的生态恢复和管理的实施。

相似文献

1
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in degraded karst landscapes of southwest China.植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特退化景观土壤质量的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2657-2665. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.372. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
2
Improvements in soil quality with vegetation succession in subtropical China karst.亚热带喀斯特地区植被演替对土壤质量的改善。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 25;775:145876. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145876. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China.植被恢复对中国西南脆弱喀斯特生态系统土壤质量的影响。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 2;8:e9456. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9456. eCollection 2020.
4
The advantage of afforestation using native tree species to enhance soil quality in degraded forest ecosystems.利用乡土树种造林以改善退化森林生态系统土壤质量的优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):20022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71162-3.
5
[Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Nitrogen Pathways in a Karst Region of Southwest China].[植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特地区土壤氮素途径的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Jun 8;39(6):2845-2852. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710066.
6
[Relationships between soil and rocky desertification in typical karst mountain area based on redundancy analysis].基于冗余分析的典型喀斯特山区土壤与石漠化的关系
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2012 Jun;33(6):2131-8.
7
[Differences in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and their impact factors under different restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau.].黄土高原不同恢复模式下土壤有机碳和全氮差异及其影响因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Mar;27(3):716-722. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.017.
8
The soil biota composition along a progressive succession of secondary vegetation in a karst area.喀斯特地区次生植被渐进演替过程中的土壤生物区系组成
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 7;9(11):e112436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112436. eCollection 2014.
9
Soil and fine roots ecological stoichiometry in different vegetation restoration stages in a karst area, southwest China.中国西南喀斯特地区不同植被恢复阶段的土壤和细根生态化学计量特征。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 15;252:109694. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109694. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Variation of soil physicochemical properties of different vegetation restoration types on subtropical karst area in southern China.中国南方亚热带喀斯特地区不同植被恢复类型的土壤理化性质变化。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282620. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of soil quality and analysis of drivers of different vegetation patterns in the loess region of Northern Shaanxi.陕北黄土地区土壤质量评价及不同植被格局驱动因素分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13113-0.
2
Multivariate analysis of soil particle size distribution and Spatial correlation with soil moisture characteristics in different vegetation types of Mu Us Sandy Land.毛乌素沙地不同植被类型土壤颗粒大小分布的多变量分析及其与土壤水分特征的空间相关性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10910-5.
3
From fields to cities: Innovating assessment of soil quality in Southern Iran's Urban areas.
从乡村到城市:伊朗南部城市地区土壤质量评估的创新
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321312. eCollection 2025.
4
Conversion of farmland to forest or grassland improves soil carbon, nitrogen, and ecosystem multi-functionality in a subtropical karst region of southwest China.在中国西南部亚热带喀斯特地区,退耕还林还草可改善土壤碳、氮及生态系统多功能性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68883-w.
5
Modeling and digital mapping of soil quality indicators in different land uses (a case study: Ravansar-Sanjabi Plain, Kermanshah).不同土地利用方式下土壤质量指标的建模与数字制图(以拉万萨尔-桑贾比平原,克尔曼沙赫为例)。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jan 23;196(2):184. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12349-z.
6
Response of grassland ecosystem function to plant functional traits under different vegetation restoration models in areas of karst desertification.喀斯特石漠化地区不同植被恢复模式下草地生态系统功能对植物功能性状的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 12;14:1239190. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1239190. eCollection 2023.
7
Restoration of soil quality of degraded grassland can be accelerated by reseeding in an arid area of Northwest China.在中国西北干旱地区,通过重新播种可以加速退化草地土壤质量的恢复。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 13;14:1101295. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1101295. eCollection 2023.
8
Variation of soil physicochemical properties of different vegetation restoration types on subtropical karst area in southern China.中国南方亚热带喀斯特地区不同植被恢复类型的土壤理化性质变化。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282620. eCollection 2023.
9
Novel Weighting Method for Evaluating Forest Soil Fertility Index: A Structural Equation Model.评估森林土壤肥力指数的新型加权方法:结构方程模型
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;12(2):410. doi: 10.3390/plants12020410.
10
Correlations between forest soil quality and aboveground vegetation characteristics in Hunan Province, China.中国湖南省森林土壤质量与地上植被特征之间的相关性
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 7;13:1009109. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1009109. eCollection 2022.