Guan Huiling, Fan Jiangwen
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China.
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 2;8:e9456. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9456. eCollection 2020.
Soil quality assessment is important for karst ecosystems where soil erosion is significant. A large amount of vegetation restoration has been implemented since the early 21st century in degraded karst areas across southwestern China. However, the impacts on soil quality of different restoration types rarely have been compared systematically. In the current study, we investigated the soil quality after a number of vegetation restoration projects as well as their adjacent cropland by analyzing soil samples. Six vegetation restoration types were evaluated, including one natural restoration (natural shrubland, protected for 13 years), three economic forests (4 years , 4 years and 6 years ) and two mixed forests (1 year -crop and 13 years - ). We evaluated the benefits of different restoration types more accurately by setting each adjacent cropland as the control and setting the variation between the corresponding restored and control site as the evaluation object so that the background differences of six sites could be eliminated. The results indicated that natural shrubland, - and were effective in improving soil quality index (SQI) in degraded karst cropland largely due to their higher SOC and TN content. The variation of SQI (VSQI) of natural shrubland was significantly higher than that in , and -crop in total soil layer (0-30 cm) ( < 0.05), indicating natural shrubland had better capacity to improve soil quality. The boosting regression tree model revealed that vegetation restoration type explained 73.49% and restoration time explained 10.30% of the variation in VSQI, which confirmed that vegetation restoration type and restoration time are critical for achieving soil reserves. Therefore, it is vital to select appropriate vegetation type in restoration projects and recovery for a long time in order to achieve better soil quality. The current study provides a theoretical basis on which to assess the effects of different vegetation restoration types on the heterogeneous degraded karst areas.
土壤质量评估对于土壤侵蚀严重的喀斯特生态系统至关重要。自21世纪初以来,中国西南部退化的喀斯特地区实施了大量植被恢复工作。然而,不同恢复类型对土壤质量的影响很少得到系统比较。在本研究中,我们通过分析土壤样本,调查了多个植被恢复项目及其相邻农田的土壤质量。评估了六种植被恢复类型,包括一种自然恢复(自然灌木林,保护13年)、三种经济林(4年、4年和6年)和两种混交林(1年农作物和13年)。我们通过将每个相邻农田作为对照,并将相应恢复地与对照地之间的差异作为评估对象,更准确地评估了不同恢复类型的效益,从而消除了六个地点的背景差异。结果表明,自然灌木林、[此处原文可能有缺失信息]和[此处原文可能有缺失信息]在很大程度上有效地提高了退化喀斯特农田的土壤质量指数(SQI),这主要是由于它们较高的土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(TN)含量。自然灌木林在总土层(0 - 30厘米)中的土壤质量指数变化(VSQI)显著高于[此处原文可能有缺失信息]、[此处原文可能有缺失信息]和[此处原文可能有缺失信息] - 农作物地(P < 0.05),表明自然灌木林具有更好的改善土壤质量的能力。增强回归树模型显示,植被恢复类型解释了VSQI变化的73.49%,恢复时间解释了10.30%,这证实了植被恢复类型和恢复时间对于实现土壤储备至关重要。因此,在恢复项目中选择合适的植被类型并进行长期恢复以实现更好的土壤质量至关重要。本研究为评估不同植被恢复类型对异质性退化喀斯特地区的影响提供了理论依据。