• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陕北黄土地区土壤质量评价及不同植被格局驱动因素分析

Evaluation of soil quality and analysis of drivers of different vegetation patterns in the loess region of Northern Shaanxi.

作者信息

Wang Youfu, Qiang Fangfang, Liu Guangquan, Liu Changhai, Gao Jie, Ai Ning

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Applied Ecology on the Loess Plateau of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions, Yan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, China.

China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13113-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-13113-0
PMID:40835622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12368040/
Abstract

Evaluating the effects of different vegetation patterns on soil quality and clarifying the soil quality drivers in the loess area of northern Shaanxi are highly important for the future land use and vegetation optimization in this area. In this work, eight typical vegetation patterns in the loess area of northern Shaanxi were used as research objects, and the main soil physicochemical indicators were screened out using principal component analysis, the soil quality evaluation model was established using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the soil quality (SQ) was comprehensively evaluated. Finally, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to explore the key factors affecting soil quality. The results revealed that (1) the maximum water holding capacity (MWHC), capillary water holding capacity (CWHC), total porosity (TCP), soil organic carbon (SOC), quick acting phosphorus (AP), C/P, and C/N of the PTF sample were significantly greater than those of the other vegetation models, and the maximum water holding capacity (MWHC), capillary water holding capacity (CWHC), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) of the MAF sample site were significantly lower than those of the other sample sites, while soil bulk density (BD) was significantly higher than other sample sites. (2) According to the principal component analysis of the 16 physical and chemical indicators, the eigenvalues of the first four principal components were 1, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 77.482%, which effectively included the information of the original variables. (3) The soil qualities of the different vegetation types in the loess area of northern Shaanxi were ranked as follows: PTF (0.534) > SLP (0.494) > SF (0.462) > MF1 (0.430) > HPF (0.423) > BLF (0.420) MF2 > (0.415) > MAF (0.389). (4) SEM revealed that soil quality drivers varied among vegetation patterns, but soil organic carbon (SOC), as the main influencing factor, positively affected all vegetation. Therefore, this study suggests that in the future, when forestry ecological construction is carried out in similar areas, vegetation such as Pinus tabuliformissmall-leaf poplars, and sea buckthorn can be created to improve soil quality and ecological benefits.

摘要

评估不同植被模式对土壤质量的影响并阐明陕北黄土区土壤质量驱动因素,对于该地区未来的土地利用和植被优化至关重要。本研究以陕北黄土区8种典型植被模式为研究对象,通过主成分分析筛选出主要土壤理化指标,采用模糊综合评价法建立土壤质量评价模型,对土壤质量(SQ)进行综合评价。最后,利用结构方程模型(SEM)探究影响土壤质量的关键因素。结果表明:(1)PTF样地的最大持水量(MWHC)、毛管持水量(CWHC)、总孔隙度(TCP)、土壤有机碳(SOC)、速效磷(AP)、C/P和C/N显著高于其他植被模式,MAF样地的最大持水量(MWHC)、毛管持水量(CWHC)、土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)和全磷(TP)显著低于其他样地,而土壤容重(BD)显著高于其他样地。(2)对16项理化指标进行主成分分析,前四个主成分的特征值均为1,累计贡献率达到77.482%,有效包含了原始变量的信息。(3)陕北黄土区不同植被类型土壤质量排序为:PTF(0.534)>SLP(0.494)>SF(0.462)>MF1(0.430)>HPF(0.423)>BLF(0.420)>MF2(0.415)>MAF(0.389)。(4)结构方程模型(SEM)表明,不同植被模式下土壤质量驱动因素存在差异,但土壤有机碳(SOC)作为主要影响因素,对所有植被均有正向影响。因此,本研究建议未来在类似地区进行林业生态建设时,可营造油松、小叶杨、沙棘等植被,以提高土壤质量和生态效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/12368040/dd8362d39de3/41598_2025_13113_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/12368040/05fa63b715b1/41598_2025_13113_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/12368040/dd8362d39de3/41598_2025_13113_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/12368040/05fa63b715b1/41598_2025_13113_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/12368040/dd8362d39de3/41598_2025_13113_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of soil quality and analysis of drivers of different vegetation patterns in the loess region of Northern Shaanxi.陕北黄土地区土壤质量评价及不同植被格局驱动因素分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13113-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Temporal and spatial variation of nutrient stoichiometry in coastal salt marshes dominated by Spartina alterniflora in eastern China: comprehensive effects of vegetation and tidal flooding.中国东部互花米草主导的滨海盐沼营养盐化学计量特征的时空变异:植被与潮水淹没的综合影响
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Jun 11;197(7):747. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14189-x.
4
[Spatial Partitioning and Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Karst and Non-Karst Regions of Southeast Yunnan Province].[滇东南岩溶与非岩溶地区土壤有机碳的空间分异及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3846-3855. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202405239.
5
[Soil Health Evaluation of Non-grain Cultivated Land Based on Soil Quality Index Area Method and Soil Sensitivity-resistance Method: A Case Study of Ningbo City].基于土壤质量指数面积法和土壤敏感性-抗性法的非粮耕地土壤健康评价——以宁波市为例
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3877-3889. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406021.
6
[Spatio-temporal Monitoring and Driving Factor Analysis of Eco-environment Quality in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi].陕北黄土高原生态环境质量时空监测与驱动因素分析
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jul 8;46(7):4522-4533. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406111.
7
[Response of Vegetation Dynamics to Climate Change and Human Activities in Shaanxi Province from 2000 to 2020].2000-2020年陕西省植被动态对气候变化和人类活动的响应
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3619-3631. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202405140.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Land Use Change Effect on Soil Carbon Stock and Selected Soil Properties in Gobu Sayyo District, Western Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西部戈布赛约区土地利用变化对土壤碳储量及选定土壤特性的影响
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Aug 6;2025:4726114. doi: 10.1155/tswj/4726114. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes of ecological vulnerability in areas with different urban expansion patterns- A case study in the Yanhe river basin, China.不同城市扩张模式下的生态脆弱性变化——以中国延河流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122607. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122607. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Correlations between forest soil quality and aboveground vegetation characteristics in Hunan Province, China.中国湖南省森林土壤质量与地上植被特征之间的相关性
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 7;13:1009109. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1009109. eCollection 2022.
3
Changes in soil water holding capacity and water availability following vegetation restoration on the Chinese Loess Plateau.
植被恢复后对中国黄土高原土壤持水能力和水分有效性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 7;11(1):9692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88914-0.
4
Quantifying the effects of precipitation, vegetation, and land preparation techniques on runoff and soil erosion in a Loess watershed of China.量化降水、植被和土地准备技术对中国黄土流域径流量和土壤侵蚀的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.255. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
5
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in degraded karst landscapes of southwest China.植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特退化景观土壤质量的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2657-2665. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.372. Epub 2018 Oct 2.