Suppr超能文献

使用汇报时间数据和对话图进行即时教师反馈。

Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.

作者信息

Coggins Andrew, Hong Sun Song, Baliga Kaushik, Halamek Louis P

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Sydney Medical School, Westmead Hospital Block K, Level 6, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Mar 7;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Debriefing is an essential skill for simulation educators and feedback for debriefers is recognised as important in progression to mastery. Existing assessment tools, such as the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), may assist in rating performance but their utility is limited by subjectivity and complexity. Use of quantitative data measurements for feedback has been shown to improve performance of clinicians but has not been studied as a focus for debriefer feedback.

METHODS

A multi-centre sample of interdisciplinary debriefings was observed. Total debriefing time, length of individual contributions and demographics were recorded. DASH scores from simulation participants, debriefers and supervising faculty were collected after each event. Conversational diagrams were drawn in real-time by supervising faculty using an approach described by Dieckmann. For each debriefing, the data points listed above were compiled on a single page and then used as a focus for feedback to the debriefer.

RESULTS

Twelve debriefings were included (µ = 6.5 simulation participants per event). Debriefers receiving feedback from supervising faculty were physicians or nurses with a range of experience (n = 7). In 9/12 cases the ratio of debriefer to simulation participant contribution length was ≧ 1:1. The diagrams for these debriefings typically resembled a fan-shape. Debriefings (n = 3) with a ratio < 1:1 received higher DASH ratings compared with the ≧ 1:1 group (p = 0.038). These debriefings generated star-shaped diagrams. Debriefer self-rated DASH scores (µ = 5.08/7.0) were lower than simulation participant scores (µ = 6.50/7.0). The differences reached statistical significance for all 6 DASH elements. Debriefers evaluated the 'usefulness' of feedback and rated it 'highly' (µ= 4.6/5).

CONCLUSION

Basic quantitative data measures collected during debriefings may represent a useful focus for immediate debriefer feedback in a healthcare simulation setting.

摘要

背景

总结汇报是模拟培训教育工作者的一项基本技能,而对总结汇报者的反馈在其迈向精通的过程中被认为很重要。现有的评估工具,如医疗保健模拟总结汇报评估(DASH),可能有助于对表现进行评分,但其效用受到主观性和复杂性的限制。已表明使用定量数据测量进行反馈可提高临床医生的表现,但尚未将其作为总结汇报者反馈的重点进行研究。

方法

观察了多中心跨学科总结汇报的样本。记录总结汇报的总时长、个人发言时长和人口统计学信息。每次活动后收集模拟参与者、总结汇报者和督导教员的DASH评分。督导教员使用Dieckmann描述的方法实时绘制对话图。对于每次总结汇报,将上述数据点汇编在单页上,然后用作向总结汇报者提供反馈的重点。

结果

纳入了12次总结汇报(每次活动平均有6.5名模拟参与者)。接受督导教员反馈的总结汇报者为具有不同经验的医生或护士(n = 7)。在9/12的案例中,总结汇报者与模拟参与者发言时长的比例≥1:1。这些总结汇报的对话图通常类似扇形。与≥1:1的组相比,比例<1:1的总结汇报(n = 3)获得了更高的DASH评分(p = 0.038)。这些总结汇报生成了星形图。总结汇报者的DASH自评分数(平均 = 5.08/7.0)低于模拟参与者的分数(平均 = 6.50/7.0)。所有6个DASH要素的差异均达到统计学意义。总结汇报者评估了反馈的“有用性”并给予“高度”评价(平均 = 4.6/5)。

结论

在总结汇报过程中收集的基本定量数据测量可能是医疗保健模拟环境中即时向总结汇报者提供反馈的有用重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5b/8900326/e12ccc810d05/41077_2022_203_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验