Suppr超能文献

不同肠道准备方法对糖尿病患者的疗效及耐受性:一项随机对照试验

Efficacy and tolerability of various bowel preparations in diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Madhoun Mohammad F, Chaudrey Khadija K, Chisholm Sian S, Ahmed Aftab, Frost Belinda, Tierney William M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.

Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2018 Oct;6(10):E1157-E1163. doi: 10.1055/a-0650-3908. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for poor bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Bisacodyl is a stimulant laxative that may mitigate colonic dysmotility associated with diabetes. We hypothesized that adding bisacodyl to split-dose bowel preparation (SDBP) would improve the quality of bowel preparation among patients with diabetes.  Adult outpatients aged 18 to 80 years undergoing colonoscopy were recruited. One hundred and eighty-six patients with diabetes were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms: 1) conventional 4 L of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS; conventional bowel preparation [CBP]); 2) split-dose of 4 L PEG-ELS (split-dose bowel preparation [SDBP]); or 3) split-dose of 4 L PEG-ELS preceded by 10 mg of oral bisacodyl 10 (SDBP-B). The primary outcome measure was bowel cleansing as indicated by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score. Endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used. Secondary outcome measures were safety and patient tolerability.  Of the 212 patients randomized, only 186 received assigned bowel preparation. There were no differences among the three study groups with regard to age, indication, duration of DM, insulin use, narcotic use, or presence of end-organ diabetic complications. There was a trend toward better bowel preparation quality among those receiving SDBP and SDBP-B compared to those receiving CBP, but the trend was not statistically significant  ≥ 6 BBPS; 67 % vs. 83 % vs. 75 %,  = 0.1). In terms of safety and tolerability, there were no differences among the three groups.  Adding bisacodyl to SDBP does not improve the quality of bowel preparation in patients with DM. Further efforts are needed to optimize colonoscopy bowel preparation in this population.

摘要

糖尿病(DM)是结肠镜检查前肠道准备不佳的独立危险因素。比沙可啶是一种刺激性泻药,可能减轻与糖尿病相关的结肠动力障碍。我们假设在分剂量肠道准备(SDBP)中添加比沙可啶会改善糖尿病患者的肠道准备质量。招募了年龄在18至80岁之间接受结肠镜检查的成年门诊患者。186名糖尿病患者被随机分配到3个治疗组中的1组:1)常规4升聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液(PEG-ELS;常规肠道准备[CBP]);2)分剂量4升PEG-ELS(分剂量肠道准备[SDBP]);或3)在分剂量4升PEG-ELS之前口服10毫克比沙可啶10(SDBP-B)。主要结局指标是波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分所表明的肠道清洁情况。内镜医师对所使用的肠道准备方法不知情。次要结局指标是安全性和患者耐受性。在随机分组的212名患者中,只有186名接受了指定的肠道准备。三个研究组在年龄、适应证、糖尿病病程、胰岛素使用、麻醉药使用或糖尿病终末器官并发症的存在方面没有差异。与接受CBP的患者相比,接受SDBP和SDBP-B的患者的肠道准备质量有改善的趋势,但该趋势无统计学意义(≥6分的BBPS;67%对83%对75%,P = 0.1)。在安全性和耐受性方面,三组之间没有差异。在SDBP中添加比沙可啶并不能改善糖尿病患者的肠道准备质量。需要进一步努力优化该人群的结肠镜检查肠道准备。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验