• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同酸蚀策略对Beautifil II聚酸改性复合树脂材料微拉伸修复粘结强度的影响。

Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material.

作者信息

Bahari Mahmoud, Savadi-Oskoee Siavash, Kimyai Soodabeh, Savadi-Oskoee Ayda, Abbasi Farhang

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Dental and Periodontal Research Center and Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e732-e738. doi: 10.4317/jced.54436. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.4317/jced.54436
PMID:30305869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6174016/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considering the differences in the filler particles between giomer and conventional composite resins and the importance of these fillers in the repair bond strength, the aim was to evaluate the effects of different etching strategies with phosphoric acid (PA) and hydrofluoric acid (HF) on the microtensile repair bond strength (µTRBS) of giomer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten giomer blocks were randomly assigned into 10: 1) control; 2) 37%PA-20s; 3) 3%HF-20s; 4) 3%HF-120s; 5) 9.6%HF-20s; 6) 9.6%HF-120s; 7) 37%PA-20s + 3%HF-120s; 8) 37%PA-20s + 9.6%HF-120s; 9) 3%HF-120s + 37%PA-20s; 10) 9.6%HF-120s + 37%PA-20s. In all groups, the One-Step Plus bonding system was applied and the new giomer block was bonded to the existing giomer. After cross-sectional cutting, 18 samples were prepared from each block and the µTRBS of the samples was measured at a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (<0.05).

RESULTS

The µTRBS in groups 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 were significantly higher than that in the control group (<0.05). The µTRBS in group 2 was even less than that in the control group (<0.001). The highest µTRBS was recorded in group 10, which was significantly different from those in groups 3, 4 and 9 (<0.05). In addition, the differences between group 9 and groups 6, 7 and 8 were significantly different (<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Etching with PA resulted in a decrease in µTRBS. Etching with HF, except for 3%HF-20s and HF after etching with PA, resulted in a significant increase in giomer`s µTRBS. An increase in the application time of 3%HF resulted in a significant increase in the µTRBS. Dental restoration repair, Hydrofluoric acid, Phosphoric acid, etching.

摘要

背景

考虑到聚硅烷复合树脂与传统复合树脂的填充颗粒存在差异,且这些填料对修复粘结强度很重要,本研究旨在评估用磷酸(PA)和氢氟酸(HF)进行不同蚀刻策略对聚硅烷微拉伸修复粘结强度(µTRBS)的影响。

材料与方法

将10个聚硅烷块随机分为10组:1)对照组;2)37%PA蚀刻20秒;3)3%HF蚀刻20秒;4)3%HF蚀刻120秒;5)9.6%HF蚀刻20秒;6)9.6%HF蚀刻120秒;7)37%PA蚀刻20秒+3%HF蚀刻120秒;8)37%PA蚀刻20秒+9.6%HF蚀刻120秒;9)3%HF蚀刻120秒+37%PA蚀刻20秒;10)9.6%HF蚀刻120秒+37%PA蚀刻20秒。在所有组中,均应用单步加粘结系统,并将新的聚硅烷块粘结到现有的聚硅烷上。横截面切割后,从每个块中制备18个样本,并以0.5 mm/min的应变率测量样本的µTRBS。数据采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行分析(<0.05)。

结果

第4、5、6、7、8和10组的µTRBS显著高于对照组(<0.05)。第2组的µTRBS甚至低于对照组(<0.001)。第10组的µTRBS最高,与第3、4和9组有显著差异(<0.05)。此外,第9组与第6、7和8组之间的差异也有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

用PA蚀刻会导致µTRBS降低。用HF蚀刻,除了3%HF蚀刻20秒以及PA蚀刻后再用HF蚀刻外,会使聚硅烷的µTRBS显著增加。3%HF应用时间的增加会导致µTRBS显著增加。牙齿修复、氢氟酸、磷酸、蚀刻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/92c0e7641301/jced-10-e732-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/aa13cb33c086/jced-10-e732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/a1c0e611e366/jced-10-e732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/b5e5d13a2c76/jced-10-e732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/92c0e7641301/jced-10-e732-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/aa13cb33c086/jced-10-e732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/a1c0e611e366/jced-10-e732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/b5e5d13a2c76/jced-10-e732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/6174016/92c0e7641301/jced-10-e732-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material.不同酸蚀策略对Beautifil II聚酸改性复合树脂材料微拉伸修复粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e732-e738. doi: 10.4317/jced.54436. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair.考虑到复合修复,蚀刻后的复合树脂的表面粗糙度。
J Dent. 2011 Jul;39(7):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite.复合材料的修复粘结强度:表面处理及复合材料类型的影响
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Jun 1;10(6):e520-e527. doi: 10.4317/jced.54030. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments.使用不同机械表面处理方法时玻璃离子增强型树脂复合体的可修复性。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):e520-e526. doi: 10.4317/jced.53591. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Influence of Heated Hydrofluoric Acid Surface Treatment on Surface Roughness and Bond Strength to Feldspathic Ceramics and Lithium-Disilicate Glass-Ceramics.加热氢氟酸表面处理对长石陶瓷和锂硅玻璃陶瓷表面粗糙度和结合强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2021 Dec 3;23(6):549-555. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2288275.
6
Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain.酸蚀后清洁及连接瓷对复合树脂与长石质瓷微拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Nov;96(5):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.007.
7
Post-etching cleaning and resin/ceramic bonding: microtensile bond strength and EDX analysis.酸蚀后清洗和树脂/陶瓷粘结:微拉伸粘结强度和 EDX 分析。
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):295-303. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17709.
8
Effect of different surface treatment on the repair bond strength of feldspathic porcelain.不同表面处理对长石质瓷修复粘结强度的影响
Dent Med Probl. 2021 Jan-Mar;58(1):107-113. doi: 10.17219/dmp/130101.
9
Effect of ceramic etching protocols on resin bond strength to a feldspar ceramic.陶瓷蚀刻方案对长石陶瓷与树脂粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):E40-6. doi: 10.2341/13-344-L. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
10
Bonding effectiveness of tooth-colored materials to resin cement provided by self-etching silane primer after short- and long-term storage.自酸蚀硅烷处理剂提供的树脂水门汀短期和长期储存后对牙色材料粘结效果的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):713.e1-713.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
An Survey on the Effect of Six Commercial Brands of Phosphoric Acid on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel.六种市售磷酸品牌对复合树脂与牙釉质微剪切粘结强度影响的调查
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Dec 1;25(4):316-325. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97528.2015. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Chemical Surface Modification Methods of Resin Composite Repaired with Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement.用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀修复树脂复合材料的化学表面改性方法
Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):804-808. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755627. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.含表面预反应玻璃离子填料的聚硅氧烷修复系统的临床评估:13年随访检查结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1036-43. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.57.
2
Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites.修复老化的甲基丙烯酸酯和硅烷醇基复合材料的粘结强度。
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Oct;15(5):447-52. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29590.
3
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Micro-shear Bond Strength of Silica- and Zirconia-filled Composite Resins.
不同表面处理对二氧化硅和氧化锆填充复合树脂修复微剪切粘结强度的影响
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Fall;6(4):131-7. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.027. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光、喷砂和硅烷处理对修复后复合材料剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):E1-9. doi: 10.2341/11-054-L. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
5
Repair of dental resin-based composites.牙科树脂基复合材料的修复。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):601-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
6
How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach.树脂基牙科材料的释放量有多少?一项荟萃分析方法。
Dent Mater. 2011 Aug;27(8):723-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair.考虑到复合修复,蚀刻后的复合树脂的表面粗糙度。
J Dent. 2011 Jul;39(7):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 6.
8
Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.不同表面处理后微混合体、纳米混合体和纳米复合材料的即刻修复粘结强度。
J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.009.
9
A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers.对含新型预反应玻璃离子(PRG)填料的释氟牙科粘合剂发展的化学方法和超微形态学研究综述。
Dent Mater J. 2008 May;27(3):315-39. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.315.
10
Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.表面处理及粘结剂对修复性复合材料粘结强度的影响
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90-8; discussion 99. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x.