• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国和意大利新生儿病房的全国性调查强调了非侵入性呼吸支持使用方面的显著差异。

National surveys of UK and Italian neonatal units highlighted significant differences in the use of non-invasive respiratory support.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, "V. Buzzi" Children's Hospital, ASST-FBF-Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Newborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2019 May;108(5):865-869. doi: 10.1111/apa.14611. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1111/apa.14611
PMID:30307647
Abstract

AIM

This study compared how non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) was provided in neonatal units in Italy and the UK.

METHODS

An NRS questionnaire was sent to tertiary neonatal centres, identified by national societies, from November 2015 to May 2016.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 49/57 (86%) UK units and 103/115 (90%) Italian units. NRS was started in the delivery room by 61% of UK units and 85% of Italian units. In neonatal intensive care units, 33% of UK units used nasal high-flow therapy (HFT) as primary support, compared to 3% in Italy. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in 57% of UK units and 90% of Italian units. The commonest starting flow rate on nasal HFT for term and preterm infants was 6 L/min in the UK, while Italian units mainly used this flow for term infants. In the UK, 67% of units decreased nasal HFT by 1 L/min per day. In Italy, infants on nasal CPAP were weaned by 1 cm H O per day in 39% of units.

CONCLUSION

The way that NRS was managed for very preterm infants differed between the UK and Italy, reflecting a lack of evidence on optimal NRS and the use of local protocols.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了意大利和英国的新生儿单位提供非侵入性呼吸支持(NRS)的方式。

方法

2015 年 11 月至 2016 年 5 月,通过国家学会确定了三级新生儿中心,并向其发送了一份 NRS 调查问卷。

结果

收到了 49/57(86%)个英国单位和 103/115(90%)个意大利单位的回复。61%的英国单位和 85%的意大利单位在产房开始使用 NRS。在新生儿重症监护病房,33%的英国单位使用鼻高流量治疗(HFT)作为主要支持,而意大利只有 3%。57%的英国单位和 90%的意大利单位使用鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。在英国,足月和早产儿使用的鼻 HFT 起始流量通常为 6L/min,而意大利的单位主要将这种流量用于足月婴儿。在英国,67%的单位每天减少 1L/min 的鼻 HFT。在意大利,39%的单位中,使用鼻 CPAP 的婴儿每天减少 1cmH2O。

结论

英国和意大利在管理极早产儿的 NRS 方式上存在差异,这反映了缺乏关于最佳 NRS 和使用本地方案的证据。

相似文献

1
National surveys of UK and Italian neonatal units highlighted significant differences in the use of non-invasive respiratory support.英国和意大利新生儿病房的全国性调查强调了非侵入性呼吸支持使用方面的显著差异。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 May;108(5):865-869. doi: 10.1111/apa.14611. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
Neonatal respiratory support strategies for the management of extremely low gestational age infants: an Italian survey.极低出生体重儿的新生儿呼吸支持策略:意大利调查。
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Apr 11;45(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0639-5.
3
Neonatal respiratory support strategies in the intensive care unit: an Italian survey.新生儿重症监护病房的呼吸支持策略:一项意大利调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Mar;172(3):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1885-3. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
4
Nasal High-Flow Therapy as Primary Respiratory Support for Preterm Infants without the Need for Rescue with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.鼻塞式高流量湿化氧疗作为早产儿一线呼吸支持治疗,无需经鼻持续气道正压通气抢救。
Neonatology. 2019;115(2):175-181. doi: 10.1159/000492930. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Respiratory support practices in infants born at term in the United Kingdom.英国足月产婴儿的呼吸支持实践。
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;171(11):1633-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1784-7. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
6
Use of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in neonates: a UK wide survey.使用加热湿化高流量鼻导管给氧在新生儿中的应用:一项英国范围的调查。
Acta Paediatr. 2013 Mar;102(3):249-53. doi: 10.1111/apa.12090. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Oscillatory ventilation for infants with respiratory distress syndrome--survey of current practice in the UK.英国对患有呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿的振荡通气——当前实践调查
J Perinat Med. 1998;26(3):201-3. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.3.201.
8
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol.一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验,比较经鼻高流量通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气作为澳大利亚非三级特殊护理病房中出生的患有早期呼吸窘迫的新生儿的主要支持治疗方法(HUNTER试验):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746.
9
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Newborn Infants in Special Care Nurseries.新生儿重症监护病房中新生儿的经鼻高流量治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2031-2040. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812077.
10
Non-invasive inhaled nitric oxide in the treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure in term and preterm infants.无创吸入一氧化氮治疗足月儿和早产儿低氧性呼吸衰竭
J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;37(1):54-60. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.164. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)及鼻间歇正压通气作为孕龄≥32周婴儿主要呼吸支持的比较:一项三臂多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7.